Structure of the heavy Ca isotopes and effective interaction in the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

structure of the heavy ca isotopes and effective
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Structure of the heavy Ca isotopes and effective interaction in the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Structure of the heavy Ca isotopes and effective interaction in the sd-fp shell F. Marchal Institut de Recherches Subatomiques, Strasbourg (France) Physics and Motivations Experiment and Results Conclusions and Perspectives Heavy calcium


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Structure of the heavy Ca isotopes and effective interaction in the sd-fp shell

  • F. Maréchal

Institut de Recherches Subatomiques, Strasbourg (France)

Physics and Motivations Experiment and Results Conclusions and Perspectives

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Heavy calcium isotopes

Z=20 Isotopes approaching the dripline Nuclear structure Astrophysical interest r process closed shell for protons very simple wave functions nuclei close to limit of existence information on strucutre of Z>20 test of the effective interaction n-n interaction in the fp shell n-p interaction across the sd-fp shell better description of heavier nuclei such as neutron-rich nickel isotopes

Ni Ni

A = 53

Sc Ti

1f7/2

r process

N Z

neutron dripline (Möller & Nix, 1995) r process (O. Sorlin, K.L. Kratz, priv. com.)

Ca K

2p3/2 1f5/2 2p1/2 2s, 1d

28 20 28 40

slide-3
SLIDE 3

d5/2 s1/2 d3/2 f7/2 p3/2 p1/2 f5/2 Z=28 Z=20 N=28 N=20 Z=8 N=8 fp shell sd shell

ν π

16O core

Otsuka et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 082502 (2001)

Evidence for a strong attractive interaction between proton and neutron spin-orbit partners πj> (j=l+1/2) and νj< (j=l-1/2)

57Ni (πf7/2 full) and 49Ca (πf7/2 empty)

same behavior for N=16 isotones in sd shell: effective single particle energy of d3/2 orbital much higher in 24O (πd5/2 empty) than in

30Si (πd5/2 full)

Ex (MeV) 2 4

57Ni29 28 49Ca29 20

5/2- 5/2- 1/2- 1/2- 3/2- 3/2-

typical case: N=29 isotones in fp shell mapping out the shell structure of nuclei can bring information on the nucleon-nucleon interaction matrix elements mapping out the shell structure of nuclei can bring information on the nucleon-nucleon interaction matrix elements mapping out the shell structure of nuclei can bring information on the nucleon-nucleon interaction matrix elements

Effective interaction between orbitals

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Ca K Ar Cl S P Si 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 Al Mg

need single-particle energies and 2-body interactions

key nuclei: (closed shell ± 1)⊗(closed shell)

39K (N=20 closed shell): single-particle energies in sd shell 41Ca (Z=20 closed shell): single-particle energies in fp shell 35Si and 47K to help to fix the 2-body monopole interactions in the region

Shell Model Calculations

Neutron number

slide-5
SLIDE 5

22 24 26 28 30 32 34 1 2 3 4 5 6

Excitation Energy (MeV) KB3G Neutron number

2+ 4+ 2+ 4+ 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 1 2 3 4 5 6

Excitation Energy (MeV) KB3 Neutron number

discrimination between interactions

How to get information on the upper part (f5/2 orbital behavior) ? lower part of fp shell relatively well known (spectroscopy of 39-47K and 35Si) n-n interaction monopole terms 2+ excited state in 54Ca (νp1/2)1⊗(νf5/2)1 4+ excited state in 52Ca (νp3/2)3⊗(νf5/2)1

Ca isotopic chain

  • F. Nowacki and E. Caurier (Priv. Comm.)
slide-6
SLIDE 6

β decay of neutron-rich nuclei

large Qβ-Sn energy window high P1n and P2n values

competition between γ and neutron emission

need for efficient γ and neutron detection for β-γ, β-n and β-n-γ coincidence measurements direct knowledge of Qβ, T1/2, Iβ, Pxn and Ex Jπ values and GT strength distribution in Qβ window

IAS GTR 2n 1n

A-2(Z+1) AZ A-1(Z+1) A(Z+1)

Sβ Qβ Sn S2n β- P.G. Hansen and B. Jonson

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ROBOT RADIOACTIVE LABORATORY

GPS HRS

REX-ISOLDE

( 2.3 MeV/A )

CONTROL ROOM 1-1.4 GeV PROTONS EXPERIMENTAL HALL

( 60 KeV )

IS392 Experiment

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Beam Ge Clusters (x2) ε ~ 5% at 1.3 MeV 4π β counter ε ~ 70% start n-TOF TONNERRE array (x16) ε ~ 11% at 1 MeV En: 0.2-7 MeV Low energy neutron detectors (x8) ε ~ 0.5% at 1 MeV En: 0.05-4 MeV

Experimental Setup

49K ~ 1.5 106 50K ~ 8.0 104 51K ~ 1.2 104 52K ~ 2.5 102 53K ~ 1.0 101

Yields (at/pulse)

Production: UC2-C target (53 g/cm2) W surface ionization source HRS mass separator (M/∆M ~ 8000) LA1 beamline transmission ~ 90 %

(LPC Caen - IFIN Bucharest) (IReS Strasbourg) (MINIBALL Collaboration) (IReS Strasbourg)

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Ca

52 20

K

52 19

Ca

51 20

Ca

50 20

1026 1718 2378 2934 3460 3500 4493 4390 2563 3990 4690 5950 9080

52K decay: preliminary results

Sn Sn S2n P2n=8(3) % P1n=67(10) %

(0-,2-) 0+ 2+ 0+ 2+ (3/2-) 4.6(3) s 10.0(8) s 13.9(6) s

~ 8 % ~ 0.5 % ~ 7 . 5 % ~ 20 % ~ 47 %

116(6) ms 1.9(1) 2.8(3) 20.3(5) < 4.0 7.8(3) 8.2(3) 7.7(2) log (f1t) Iβ (%) Qβ = 16310 (840) keV 3 new transitions in 52Ca 7 new transitions in 51Ca 1 new transition in 50Ca 1 transition (3150 keV) not attributed new T1/2, P1n and P2n values

Langevin et al., Phys. Lett. 130B, 251 (1983) Huck et al., Phys. Rev. C 31, 2226 (1985)

T1/2 = 105(5) ms, Pn=107(20) % 2+ state and 2563 keV transition in 52Ca

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Ca

53 20

K

53 19

Ca

52 20

2563 4690 2220 3460 8150

53K decay: preliminary results

Sn Sn S2n

(1/2+,3/2+) 0+ 2+ (1/2-) (3/2-,5/2-) 90(15) ms 4.6(3) s 30(5) ms Qβ = 15900 (860) keV 1 new transition in 53Ca: 2220 keV 1 new transition in 52Ca: 2563 keV 1 transition (3150 keV) not attributed

Langevin et al., Phys. Lett. 130B, 251 (1983)

T1/2 = 30(5) ms, Pn=100(30) %

slide-13
SLIDE 13

0.00 2.56 3.99 5.95 0.00 2.35 3.08 3.90 3.94 4.23 4.28 0.00 2.43 3.24 4.43 5.44 5.49 5.77 1+ 4+ 2+ 4+2+ 0+ 1+ 0+ (0+,1+,4+) 1+ 1+ 2+ 2+ 2+ 0+ 0+ 0+

KB3 KB3G Exp.

GT strength function calculation could assign the Jπ of the 3.99 MeV state Jπ of the 3.99 MeV state ? νp3/2-νp1/2 gap relatively well known N=32 subshell closure reproduced by KB3 and KB3G interactions 4+ only if 52K g.s. has Jπ=2- non-natural parity state ? strength must fit the feeding Iβ~2% natural parity state: info on f5/2 2+ possible with same (νp3/2)3⊗(νf5/2)1 configuration first 2+ (p3/2⊗p1/2) rules out a possible 1+ (p3/2⊗p1/2) but no E2 transition to g.s.

52Ca

slide-14
SLIDE 14

1/2-

Ca

49

Ca

51

Ca

53 5/2- 5/2- 3/2- (5/2-) (1/2-) (3/2-) (3/2-,5/2-) (3/2-,5/2-) (1/2-) 5/2- 5/2- 5/2- 5/2- 1/2- 1/2- 1/2- 3/2- 3/2- 3/2-

Ca

49

Ca

53

Ca

51

Ca

49

Ca

51

Ca

53 5/2- 5/2- 5/2- 5/2- 3/2- 3/2- 3/2- 1/2- 1/2- 1/2- 5/2-

3.50 2.93 2.38 1.72 2.02 3.59 4.07

3/2-

3.80 2.16 1.57 3.84 3.79 1.81 2.79 2.28 2.22 3.89 3.44 1.82 2.82 2.12 1.61 1.03 2.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

KB3G Exp. KB3 (~GXPF1)

Comparison Exp. vs. Theory for odd Ca isotopes

β decay of the N=33 55Ti nucleus consistent with a 5/2- g.s. Jπ assignment depends on interaction above 2.5 MeV Results support KB3G with a more attractive p3/2-f5/2 lower part of fp shell well known

49Ca: good agreement between

experiment and theory

51Ca: preliminary results 53Ca:

good agreement for lowest states 2.22 MeV state: Jπ=3/2- better overlap with 53K g.s. configuration 1/2+ or 3/2+

Mantica et al., Phys. Rev. C 68,044311 (2003)

p1/2 and f5/2 orbitals very close 5/2- state too high with KB3

slide-15
SLIDE 15

analysis of 53K experiment (july 03) to complete decay scheme (n,γ) new neutron transitions observed but statistics very low

Conclusions Perspectives

new neutron transitions observed decay of 53K: we have measured the decays of 52K, 52K and 52K at CERN using efficient n and γ detection experimental data: decay of 52K: new T1/2, P1n and P2n values for 52K GT strength calculation to locate non-natural parity states calculations: tuning of n-n interaction in fp shell: evolution of p1/2-f5/2 orbitals tuning of p-n interaction in sd-fp shell: systematic of negative parity states look for possible developments of target and ion source to study 54K 54Ca refine neutron spectroscopy for 52K decay (Ex, feedings) 11 new transitions identified 3 new transitions identified 2 new low energy neutron transitions to 51Ca g.s. ~10 new n-γ coincidences (mainly to 1.72 and 2.38 MeV states)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Many thanks to all my colleagues from Geneva, Bucharest, Caen, Constantine and Strasbourg who have made this work possible

  • P. Dessagne
  • A. Buta
  • G. Heitz
  • F. Benrachi
  • S. Courtin
  • S. Grévy
  • C. Borcea

J.C. Caspar J.C. Angélique

  • F. Perrot
  • F. Negoita
  • P. Baumann
  • M. Ramdhane
  • N. Orr
  • G. Ban

F.R. Lecolley

  • I. Stefan
  • C. Jollet
  • D. Etasse
  • F. Nowacki
  • E. Caurier
  • G. Le Scornet
  • E. Poirier
  • C. Miehé
  • E. Liénard

the IReS (Strasbourg) workshop and the ISOLDE collaboration.