structural study on hiv viral tropism
play

Structural study on HIV viral tropism Olga V. Kalinina Max Planck - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Structural study on HIV viral tropism Olga V. Kalinina Max Planck Institute for Informatics 1 Two step entry into host cell 2 Two step entry into host cell 2 Two step entry into host cell CD4, bound by gp120 (V1 & V2 loops)


  1. Structural study on HIV viral tropism Olga V. Kalinina Max Planck Institute for Informatics 1

  2. Two step entry into host cell 2

  3. Two step entry into host cell 2

  4. Two step entry into host cell • CD4, bound by gp120 (V1 & V2 loops) • CCR5 & CXCR4, bound by gp120’s V3 loop 2

  5. Can we predict tropism? • Tropism is largely defined by V3 loop of gp120 • Known predictors of co- receptor tropism: • 11/25 rule (positive charge at positions 11 & 25 of V3): 62% sensitivity at 5% FPR • Sequence-based SVM: 71% • Incorporating structure into SVM: up to 80% • Physico-chemical basis: unknown Sander et al., PLoS Comp Biol 2007 3

  6. CCR5 & CXCR4 • G-protein coupled receptors (7 TM bundles, transfer extracellular signals into the cell) • Structure of CXCR4 solved in 2012 • Structure of CCR5 modelled on that template 4

  7. Interaction between HIV’s gp120 and host receptors Wu et al., 2010 Science 5

  8. Interaction between HIV’s gp120 and host receptors This is pure imagination! Wu et al., 2010 Science 5

  9. Data • Experimentally verified sequences (Bozek et al., Retrovirology 2012): 7 R5 & 13 X4 • Prototypical sequences from geno2pheno-C [NGS-Sanger] (Pfeifer et al., Bioinformatics 2012): 47 R5 & 49 X4 • Prototypical sequences from geno2pheno-C [NGS-Sanger] and geno2pheno[coreceptor]: 31 R5 & 27 X4 • V3 loop structure from PDB entry 2b4c • CXCR4 structure from PDB entry 2oe0 • CCR5 structure model (33% identity, 55% positives to CXCR4) 6

  10. Sequence comparison does not work Pfeifer & Lengauer, Bioinformatics , 2012 7

  11. Sequence comparison does not work Pfeifer & Lengauer, Bioinformatics , 2012 Experimental Predicted R5 X4 7

  12. What else can we measure? • Charge (recall 11/25 rule) • Statistical preferences in peptide binding ( PepSite , Trabuco et al., Nucl Acids Res 2012) • Docking energy of receptor-loop complex ( FlexPepDock , London et al., Nucl Acids Res 2011) 8

  13. Charge R5_exp X4_exp R5_pred2 X4_pred2 R5_pred X4_pred p=0.003 p=7e-5 p=0.07 9

  14. PepSite: how it works 10

  15. PepSite: amino acid preferences Positively Phe charged Proline 11

  16. PepSite: score for V3 loops 220 215 210 Experimentally tested 205 200 195 CCR5_R5 CCR5_X4 CXCR4_R5 CXCR4_X4 215 210 205 Predicted Predicted 200 w/2 methods 195 190 CCR5_R5 CCR5_X4 CXCR4_R5 CXCR4_X4 12

  17. FlexPepDock • Protein-peptide docking protocol • Side chains and backbone of peptide flexible • Side chains of protein flexible, backbone fixed 13

  18. FlexPepDock: results Experimentally Prediction, Prediction, tested 2 methods NGS-Sanger All-complex energy Interface energy Extremely weak difference 14

  19. FlexPepDock: loop split in halves Left-hand half Right-hand half 15

  20. Back to receptors CCR5 CXCR4 side top 16

  21. Electrostatic potential CCR5 CXCR4 side top 17 -5 kT/e +5 kT/e

  22. Endogenous ligands • CCR5: CCL5, CCL3, CCL4 (all chemokines) • CXCR4: SDF-1 (chemokine), extracellular ubiquitin 18

  23. Ligand electrostatic potential CCR5 ligands CXCR4 ligands CCL5 SDF-1 CCL3 Ubiquitin CCL4 19 -5 kT/e +5 kT/e

  24. Ligand electrostatic potential CCR5 ligands CXCR4 ligands Glycosylated! CCL5 SDF-1 CCL3 Ubiquitin CCL4 19 -5 kT/e +5 kT/e

  25. Interaction model CCR5 with its ligands CXCR4 with its ligands 20

  26. What does this imply for tropism? 21

  27. What does this imply for tropism? • Appears to be defined by charge 21

  28. What does this imply for tropism? • Appears to be defined by charge • Glycans often confer negative charge 21

  29. What does this imply for tropism? • Appears to be defined by charge • Glycans often confer negative charge • There is a glycosylation site in pos 301 in 47/47 R5 and 46/49 X4 sequences, but it is not necessarily occupied 21

  30. What does this imply for tropism? • Appears to be defined by charge • Glycans often confer negative charge • There is a glycosylation site in pos 301 in 47/47 R5 and 46/49 X4 sequences, but it is not necessarily occupied • Removal of a glycosylation site switches tropism from R5 to X4 (Pollakis et al, 2001) 21

  31. Acknowledgements • Nico Pfeifer • Thomas Lengauer • Department for Applied Algorithmics and Computational Biology, MPII 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend