Strong SO(10)-inspired leptogenesis predictions and justification - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

strong so 10 inspired leptogenesis
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Strong SO(10)-inspired leptogenesis predictions and justification - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Luca Marzola Strong SO(10)-inspired leptogenesis predictions and justification Reference papers: E. Bertuzzo, P . Di Bari, L.M. - Nucl.Phys.B849:521-548,2011 P . Di Bari, L. M. - in preparation Rencontres de Moriond, E.W.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Strong SO(10)-inspired leptogenesis

– predictions and justification –

Rencontres de Moriond, E.W. session, 3-10/03/2012

Luca Marzola Reference papers:

  • E. Bertuzzo, P

. Di Bari, L.M. - Nucl.Phys.B849:521-548,2011

  • P

. Di Bari, L. M. - in preparation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The model:

18 new parameters: hαi, Mi.

  • Seesaw type I, 3 RH neutrinos NRi

L = LSM + iNRi@µµNRi − hαi`LαNRi ˜ Φ − 1 2

3

X

i=1

Nc

RiDMiNRi + H.c.

  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session

Dx:=diag(X1, X2,X3)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The model:

18 new parameters: hαi, Mi.

  • Seesaw type I, 3 RH neutrinos NRi

L = LSM + iNRi@µµNRi − hαi`LαNRi ˜ Φ − 1 2

3

X

i=1

Nc

RiDMiNRi + H.c.

  • Seesaw algebra:

mν = −mD 1 DM mT

D

mD = vh

−Dm = U †mνU ∗

mD = V †

LDmDUR

  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session

Dx:=diag(X1, X2,X3) assuming diagonalised charged leptons

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The model:

18 new parameters: hαi, Mi.

  • Seesaw type I, 3 RH neutrinos NRi

L = LSM + iNRi@µµNRi − hαi`LαNRi ˜ Φ − 1 2

3

X

i=1

Nc

RiDMiNRi + H.c.

  • Seesaw algebra:

mν = −mD 1 DM mT

D

mD = vh

−Dm = U †mνU ∗

mD = V †

LDmDUR

P . Di Bari, A. Riotto; 2008

M−1 := D−1

mDVLUDmU T V T L D−1 mD ≡ URD−1 M U T R

given by diagonalisation of M−1(M−1)†

  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session

Dx:=diag(X1, X2,X3) assuming diagonalised charged leptons

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The model:

18 new parameters: hαi, Mi.

  • Seesaw type I, 3 RH neutrinos NRi

L = LSM + iNRi@µµNRi − hαi`LαNRi ˜ Φ − 1 2

3

X

i=1

Nc

RiDMiNRi + H.c.

  • Seesaw algebra:

mν = −mD 1 DM mT

D

mD = vh

−Dm = U †mνU ∗

mD = V †

LDmDUR

P . Di Bari, A. Riotto; 2008

M−1 := D−1

mDVLUDmU T V T L D−1 mD ≡ URD−1 M U T R

given by diagonalisation of M−1(M−1)† 15 + 3 → 6 + 3 + 6 + 3

hαi, Mi → U, mi,VL, mDi

  • Our choice:
  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session

Dx:=diag(X1, X2,X3) assuming diagonalised charged leptons

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The model:

18 new parameters: hαi, Mi.

  • Seesaw type I, 3 RH neutrinos NRi

L = LSM + iNRi@µµNRi − hαi`LαNRi ˜ Φ − 1 2

3

X

i=1

Nc

RiDMiNRi + H.c.

  • Seesaw algebra:

mν = −mD 1 DM mT

D

mD = vh

−Dm = U †mνU ∗

mD = V †

LDmDUR

P . Di Bari, A. Riotto; 2008

M−1 := D−1

mDVLUDmU T V T L D−1 mD ≡ URD−1 M U T R

given by diagonalisation of M−1(M−1)† 15 + 3 → 6 + 3 + 6 + 3

hαi, Mi → U, mi,VL, mDi

  • Our choice:

neutrino oscillation experiments SO(10)-inspired conditions

  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session

Dx:=diag(X1, X2,X3) assuming diagonalised charged leptons

slide-7
SLIDE 7

SO(10)-inspired leptogenesis:

  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session
  • SO(10)-inspired conditions:
  • VL mixing angles not larger than CKM ones
  • light neutrino Dirac masses proportional to the up-type quark
  • nes:

mDi parametrized by αi ~ O(1)...but only α2 matters!

DmD =   α1mu α2mc α3mt  

slide-8
SLIDE 8

SO(10)-inspired leptogenesis:

  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session
  • SO(10)-inspired conditions:
  • VL mixing angles not larger than CKM ones
  • light neutrino Dirac masses proportional to the up-type quark
  • nes:

mDi parametrized by αi ~ O(1)...but only α2 matters!

DmD =   α1mu α2mc α3mt  

Strongly hierarchical RH neutrino mass spectrum:

M3 > 1012 GeV > M2 > 109 GeV M1

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SO(10)-inspired leptogenesis:

  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session
  • SO(10)-inspired conditions:
  • VL mixing angles not larger than CKM ones
  • light neutrino Dirac masses proportional to the up-type quark
  • nes:

mDi parametrized by αi ~ O(1)...but only α2 matters!

DmD =   α1mu α2mc α3mt  

Strongly hierarchical RH neutrino mass spectrum:

M3 > 1012 GeV > M2 > 109 GeV M1

P . Di Bari, A. Riotto; 2010

  • Leptogenesis process: N2 dominated scenario

Nlep,f

B−L ' P 0 2e

P 0

˜ τ2

ε˜

τ2κ(K2, K˜ τ2)e− 3π

8 K1e + P 0

P 0

˜ τ2

ε˜

τ2κ(K2, K˜ τ2)e− 3π

8 K1µ + ε2τκ(K2, K2τ)e− 3π 8 K1τ

  • N3: no active role
  • N2: asymmetry production in a 2-flavour regime
  • N1: asymmetry wash-out (M1<109 GeV) in a 3-flavour regime
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Strong thermal leptogenesis:

  • Why ?
  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session

ηCMB

B

∼ 10−9

  • 10-9 is the natural order for
  • Neglected possible preexistent contributions!!

ηlep

B ∼ 10−2N lep,f B−L

Npreex,0

B−L

∼ O(1)

ηB ' 10−2 ⇣ Nlep,f

B−L + Npreex,f B−L

⌘ 10−9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Strong thermal leptogenesis:

  • Why ?
  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session

ηCMB

B

∼ 10−9

  • 10-9 is the natural order for
  • Neglected possible preexistent contributions!!

ηlep

B ∼ 10−2N lep,f B−L

Npreex,0

B−L

∼ O(1)

ηB ' 10−2 ⇣ Nlep,f

B−L + Npreex,f B−L

⌘ 10−9

  • depends on unknown initial conditions (state of the

Universe after inflation era)

Npreex,0

B−L

ηCMB

B

∼ 10−9

why ?

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Easy achievement in

Vanilla Leptogenesis

  • Flavour effects impose restrictive conditions on the seesaw

parameter space, respected ONLY by the

Strong thermal leptogenesis:

휏-N2 dominated scenario

  • Why ?
  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session

ηCMB

B

∼ 10−9

  • Strong thermal leptogenesis:
  • 10-9 is the natural order for
  • Neglected possible preexistent contributions!!

ηlep

B ∼ 10−2N lep,f B−L

Npreex,0

B−L

∼ O(1)

ηB ' 10−2 ⇣ Nlep,f

B−L + Npreex,f B−L

⌘ 10−9

  • depends on unknown initial conditions (state of the

Universe after inflation era)

Npreex,0

B−L

ηB ' 10−2 ⇣ N lep,f

B−L + N preex,f B−L

⌘ ' 10−9

  • E. Bertuzzo, P

. Di Bari, L.M.; 2011

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Easy achievement in

Vanilla Leptogenesis

  • Flavour effects impose restrictive conditions on the seesaw

parameter space, respected ONLY by the

Strong thermal leptogenesis:

휏-N2 dominated scenario

  • Why ?
  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session

N2 dominated leptogenesis + strong washout: K2>>1 Asymmetric washout from N1: K1e, K1µ>>1; K1휏~1

ηCMB

B

∼ 10−9

  • Strong thermal leptogenesis:
  • 10-9 is the natural order for
  • Neglected possible preexistent contributions!!

ηlep

B ∼ 10−2N lep,f B−L

Npreex,0

B−L

∼ O(1)

ηB ' 10−2 ⇣ Nlep,f

B−L + Npreex,f B−L

⌘ 10−9

  • depends on unknown initial conditions (state of the

Universe after inflation era)

Npreex,0

B−L

ηB ' 10−2 ⇣ N lep,f

B−L + N preex,f B−L

⌘ ' 10−9

  • E. Bertuzzo, P

. Di Bari, L.M.; 2011

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Strong SO(10)-inspired leptogenesis:

휃13 vs m1 휃23 vs m1 mee vs m1 α2 =5, 1⩽VL⩽CKM, normal ordering. =0, 10-3, 10-2, 10-1 ⍴ vs σ (1/π) JCP vs 휃13 Mi vs m1

P . Di Bari, L.M. - Work in progress

  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session

N preex,0

B−L

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Epilogue:

SO(10)-inspired model:

  • minimal SM extension
  • implement flavour effects
  • consistent with current

experimental results

Strong leptogenesis:

  • independence of initial

conditions

  • justifies value of BAU
  • ensures predictability of

the model

Strong SO(10)-inspired leptogenesis:

  • phenomenological test of the Seesaw parameter space
  • no inverted ordering
  • sharp predictions:
  • m1⋍mee~10-2 eV
  • large 휃13, non-maximal 휃23
  • L. Marzola - Rencontres de Moriond, EW session