Strictly Proper Decision Markets A reminder about Problem set 2 Due - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

strictly proper decision markets a reminder about problem
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Strictly Proper Decision Markets A reminder about Problem set 2 Due - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Strictly Proper Decision Markets A reminder about Problem set 2 Due in 8 days Project proposals are due less than a week after Literature review is an opportunity to get a head start on the proposal and projects What is a Decision


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Strictly Proper Decision Markets

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A reminder about Problem set 2

  • Due in 8 days
  • Project proposals are due less than a week after
  • Literature review is an opportunity to get a head

start on the proposal and projects

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What is a Decision Market?

  • It’s a lot like a prediction market
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Discuss: Why do we speculate?

  • What are we running prediction markets for?
slide-5
SLIDE 5

History: Hanson writes an article

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Hanson’s decision markets

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Hanson’s decision markets

Quantitative Easing Helicopter Money No stimulus Adopting NDGP Possible Policies

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Hanson’s decision markets

Effect on GDP Quantitative Easing Helicopter Money No stimulus Adopting NDGP Possible Policies

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Hanson’s decision markets

Effect on GDP Quantitative Easing Helicopter Money No stimulus Adopting NDGP Possible Policies

?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Hanson’s decision markets

Effect on GDP Quantitative Easing Helicopter Money No stimulus Adopting NDGP Possible Policies

?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Hanson’s decision markets

Effect on GDP Quantitative Easing Helicopter Money No stimulus Adopting NDGP Possible Policies +.3% +.9%

  • .8%

+1.7%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Hanson’s decision markets

Effect on GDP Quantitative Easing Helicopter Money No stimulus Adopting NDGP Possible Policies +.3% +.9%

  • .8%

+1.7%

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Hanson’s decision markets

Effect on GDP Quantitative Easing Helicopter Money No stimulus Adopting NDGP Possible Policies +.3% (?) +.9%(+1.5%)

  • .8% (?)

+1.7% (+1.1%)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Philosophy: Markets with agency

Art’s vocation is to unveil the truth in the form of sensuous artistic configuration, to set forth the reconciled opposition just mentioned [the common world of earthly temporality, and a realm of thought and freedom], and so to have its end and aim in itself, in this very setting forth and unveiling. Hegel

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Philosophy: Markets with agency

If Hegel had written the whole of his logic and then said, in the preface or some other place, that it was merely an experiment in thought in which he had even begged the question in many places, then he would certainly have been the greatest thinker who had ever lived. As it is, he is merely comic. Kierkegaard

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Philosophy: Markets with agency

You love the accidental. A smile from a pretty girl in an interesting situation, a stolen glance, that is what you are hunting for, that is a motif for your aimless fantasy. You who always pride yourself on being an

  • bservateur must, in return, put up with

becoming an object of observation. Kierkegaard

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Philosophy: Markets with agency

And thus the native hue of resolution Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought; And enterprises of great pith and moment, With this regard, their currents turn awry, And lose the name of action. Hamlet

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Markets where actions matter

  • Othman and Sandholm

▫ Single expert decision making

  • Chen and Kash

▫ Single expert decision making (generally)

  • Shi, Conitzer, Guo

▫ Principal-aligned scoring rules

  • Boutilier

▫ Self-interested experts

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Modeling Decision Markets

  • A decision maker considers
  • A set of possible actions, A

▫ E.g. up, down, invest in project A, hire person B, implement policy X, travel to Istanbul, etc.

  • A set of outcomes of interest, O

▫ Will we see a profit? Will public welfare increase? Will I eat some kebab?

  • And wants to learn the mapping from actions (A)

to outcomes (O) to make an informed decision

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Modeling Decision Markets

Step 1: Elicit action-outcome matrices

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Discuss: What are other examples?

  • And what drawbacks / possibilities are there for

each one?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Modeling Decision Markets

Step 2: Create a decision policy

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Modeling Decision Markets

Step 2: Create a decision policy

Review market’s closing prediction

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Modeling Decision Markets

Step 2: Create a decision policy

Review market’s closing prediction Create probability distribution

  • ver the actions

80% 20% decision rule d

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Modeling Decision Markets

Step 3: Pick an action

80% 20%

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Modeling Decision Markets

Step 4: Observe the outcome

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Modeling Decision Markets

Step 5: Score experts

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Modeling Decision Markets

Step 5: Score experts

Actions (Springfield) Outcomes (Profit) Decision policy (.8, .2) Action-Outcome matrix

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Modeling Decision Markets

decision scoring rule scoring rule

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Discuss: why is strict properness important?

  • Because it totally is.
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Strict Properness for an expert

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Strict Properness for an expert

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Strict Properness for an expert

expected score

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Strict Properness for an expert

expected score

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Strict Properness for an expert

expected score how likely action a is to be taken given your report p (remember, only one expert so first report is the last report)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Strict Properness for an expert

expected score how likely action a is to be taken given your report p (remember, only one expert so first report is the last report)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Strict Properness for an expert

expected score how likely action a is to be taken given your report p (remember, only one expert so first report is the last report) your belief in the likelihood of

  • utcome o given action a is taken
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Strict Properness for an expert

expected score how likely action a is to be taken given your report p (remember, only one expert so first report is the last report) your belief in the likelihood of

  • utcome o given action a is taken
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Strict Properness for an expert

expected score how likely action a is to be taken given your report p (remember, only one expert so first report is the last report) your belief in the likelihood of

  • utcome o given action a is taken

score for your prediction given this action and outcome

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Strict Properness for an expert

The unique score maximizing prediction is always your true beliefs.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Strict Properness for a market

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Discuss: why are markets different?

  • How many people are in a market? Not one

but…

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Strict Properness for a market

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Strict Properness for a market

decision policy now arbitrary

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Strict Properness for a market

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Strict Properness for a market

expected score

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Strict Properness for a market

expected score

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Strict Properness for a market

expected score in a prediction market this term is constant in a decision market it depends on d, the decision policy, which depends

  • n…
slide-50
SLIDE 50

Strictly Proper Pair

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Strictly Proper Pair

strict properness for an expert makes prior prediction constant

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Strictly Proper Pair

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Strict Properness Summary

  • Different constraints for a single expert and

many experts in a market

  • A strictly proper pair is strictly proper for both
  • These describe all of strictly proper for a market

pairs (minus some uninteresting basically the same set)

  • But not quite all of strict properness for an

expert

slide-54
SLIDE 54
slide-55
SLIDE 55

Randomly taking any action is necessary

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Randomly taking any action is necessary

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Randomly taking any action is sufficient

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Randomly taking any action is sufficient

take a strictly proper scoring rule

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Randomly taking any action is sufficient

  • 1. take a strictly proper scoring rule
  • 2. divide by the inverse likelihood

the action is taken

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Randomly taking any action is sufficient

  • 1. take a strictly proper scoring rule
  • 2. divide by the inverse likelihood

the action is taken

  • 3. gives the same

expected value as many strictly proper prediction markets

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Example

80% 20%

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Example

(2/3 log 2/3 + 1/3 log 1/3) + (2/5 log 2/5 + 3/5 log 3/5) expected score using log scoring rule for two prediction markets

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Example

80% 20%

.8(2/3 log 2/3 + 1/3 log 1/3) + .2(2/5 log 2/5 + 3/5 log 3/5) expected score using log scoring rule

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Example

80% 20%

.8/.8(2/3 log 2/3 + 1/3 log 1/3) + .2/.2(2/5 log 2/5 + 3/5 log 3/5) expected score using (unbiased) log scoring rule

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Characterization

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Discuss: where does this leave us?

  • Are these markets practical/credible?
slide-67
SLIDE 67

Where the first prediction is also the last

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Hypothetical

  • I am a firm and I want to open a store in a city

that maximizes my profit.

  • I will open a store in whatever city you say.
  • I will pay you 1% of my eventual profit.
slide-69
SLIDE 69

Hypothetical

  • I am a firm and I want to open a store in a city

that maximizes my profit.

  • I will open a store in whatever city you say.
  • I will pay you 1% of my eventual profit.

Right-action rule (RAR)

slide-70
SLIDE 70
slide-71
SLIDE 71

Research is fun (aside)

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Research is fun (aside) (part 2)

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Preferences

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Preferences

Previously we didn’t have to talk about preferences, but it turns out

  • nly some preferences have right-action rules!
slide-75
SLIDE 75

Preferences

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Preferences

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Preferences

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Preferences

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Discuss: single expert v. market

  • Sometimes one or the other?
slide-80
SLIDE 80

Discuss: where do we go from here?

  • the undiscovere'd country (?)
slide-81
SLIDE 81

Conclusion

  • Decision markets are part of an emerging

interest in “markets that do things”

  • This started as a 286r project

▫ Think big about your project!