strengths approaches to early childhood education angela
play

Strengths Approaches to Early Childhood Education Angela Fenton - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Strengths Approaches to Early Childhood Education Angela Fenton School of Education Research Seminar 5 th June 2013 Doctoral Research: A Strengths Approach to Child-Protection Education Direct link via digital thesis ResearchOnline@JCU:


  1. Strengths Approaches to Early Childhood Education Angela Fenton School of Education – Research Seminar 5 th June 2013

  2. Doctoral Research: A Strengths Approach to Child-Protection Education Direct link via digital thesis ResearchOnline@JCU: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/24044/1/01thesis.pdf

  3. Research Opportunity Doctoral Research: To explore the ‘Strengths Approach’ (McCashen, 2005) to child protection with a group of early childhood pre-service teachers Present and examine responses for the:  Possibility of enhancing teacher preparation to protect children  Potential of approach in education (outside of its social service/psychology origins)

  4. Strengths Approach • Dependent upon positive attitudes about people‟s [ children's ] dignity, capacities, Dr Donald O. Clifton Founder Strengths rights, uniqueness and commonalities Psychology • Emphasises people‟s [ children & teachers ] ability to be their own agents of change • Enables people [ children & teachers ] to identify, value and mobilise their strengths as opposed to compensating for their deficits The Strengths (Adapted from McCashen, 2005, p. v) Approach links to power & knowledge Social Services concepts in major education theories. Moving beyond “child rescue” to raising resilience

  5. What boundaries does the research cross? • Literature Review Inter-disciplinary Psychology, Social boundaries Services, Health & Education literature informs the research • Methodology Education sector Participants transition boundaries from Pre-service to practising teachers Researcher from teacher educator to colleague • Findings - Rethinking Conceptual boundaries how we view and approach child protection preparation

  6. Literature Review Findings Teacher Preparation Child Abuse Mass of reports Some research studies • Abuse global/Australia • Teachers overwhelmed • Qld/local stats • Fear & anxiety • Definitions/history • Changes to legislation • Effects of abuse • Calls for a new model • Health literature • Education literature Child Protection Strengths Approach Few studies Contemporary Research • Informal/ descriptive • Therapeutic applications • Adjunct programs • Positive Psychology • Resiliency links • Integrated, critical, • Potential for mentoring, & resources education/critiques • Social service literature

  7. Methodology Organisation: Early Childhood pre-service teachers complete an integrated strengths-based child protection module Dual role teacher/researcher - ethical considerations and boundary considerations – role as teacher educator/colleague Data collected: 3 Phases - during module (students), post teaching prac, 12mths after module as graduating (practising teachers) Qualitative study - Strengths principles inform the theoretical framework  Collaborative, power with rather than power over - social justice  Uses existing strengths and resources

  8. Collecting responses & Analysis Participant narratives from:  Electronic Discussion Board & Email responses (EView)  Interviews (Open View) and Focus Groups (Open Focus) Analysis:  Thematic (zoom out) group responses to research themes: child abuse & protection, teacher prep & strengths approach  Contextual (zoom in) individuals & context of first responses to module, teaching practice experiences & preparation for graduation Interpretations link to lit review findings and strengths approach principles and a layer of contextual analysis is added

  9. Early Responses: Telling the story “While I was on one prac the teacher told me that a child in the class had recently stated to her mother that she had been sexually abused by a family member. As I reflect upon the situation, I realise that I tried to deny that this child had been abused. It was not a case of not believing the child, but I just did not know how to react to this child anymore. Also, I did not want to think of the horrible experience and the negative impact it would, and had already, had on that child's life.” (Participant 7)

  10. Phase 2 „I think that the strengths based approach offers a way of thinking about how we react to certain situations and how these situations make us feel…The thing that I like the most about what I have learnt so far is the idea of changing the frame. Through changing the frame, it gives us a whole different way of thinking about who we are and what is possible for us‟ (Participant 19). Limitations: Scale, contextualised, further work needed

  11. Overall  Tentatively positive - A Strengths Approach appeared to enhance preparation to protect children for the teachers in the study – though adaptations needed  Individualised vignettes show increased confidence to discuss and explore strategies to address child abuse with children especially in Phases 2 & 3 - though scaffolded  Findings confirmed literature suggestions of heightened anxiety, expressed elevated emotions, knowledge of responsibilities & explored idea of educational neglect  Showed engagement with Strengths Approach as potentially useful for education contexts as well as therapeutic contexts 11

  12. Doctoral related Publications Peer reviewed publications:  University of Sydney „Communities and Change‟ 08 - Caution children crossing ahead: Child protection education with pre- service teachers using a strengths approach http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/ 3910/1/Chapter%209.pdf  International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning (USQ) 2008 - From strength to strength: An educational research journey http://pubs.e- contentmanagement.com/doi/abs/10.5172/ijpl .4.5.90 Practitioner publications:  „Building Blocks‟ Child protection resource kit 04. 12

  13. New research/publications – Strands of research • Methodological Opportunities: A Strengths Approach – AARE 2010 Conference http://ocs.sfu.ca/aare/index.php/AARE/AARE_2010/paper/view/1832 • Using a strengths approach in early childhood education across the „preservice - inservice‟ boundary – AARE 2011 Conference Symposium • Work Integrated Learning – Using a Strengths Approach to Collaborative Education – Australian Collaborative Education Network Conference 2012. Asia Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education http://acen.edu.au/2012conference/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/108_Using-a- Strengths-Approach-in-Collaborative-Education.pdf • Accepted: Supporting Early Childhood Pre-Service Teachers in Their Work with Children, and Families with Complex Needs: A Strengths Approach – coauthored with Dr Laura Piazza – Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education • Under Review: Supporting Early Childhood Services: Strengths Approach Case Studies coauthored with Kerryann Walsh, Tamara Cummings, Sandie Wong • In preparation: Spiritual Development and Protection in Early Childhood: A Strengths Approach – Dr Jane Bone • Conceptual: Strengths based Eview development: Eresearch – with Dr Penny Cooke 13

  14. Questions? Thankyou, Contact:afenton@csu.edu.au Tel: (02) 60519148 SOE (Albury) Rm124 14

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend