Streaming Methods Required For Linked LASPS Existing Technologies - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

streaming methods required
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Streaming Methods Required For Linked LASPS Existing Technologies - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Streaming Methods Required For Linked LASPS Existing Technologies (e.g. CA systems) Move to DECE Common Streaming Technology For Dynamic LASPS Existing Technologies Move to DECE Common Streaming Technology 1 DECE


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1 DECE CONFIDENTIAL

Streaming Methods Required

  • For Linked LASPS

–Existing Technologies (e.g. CA systems) –Move to DECE Common Streaming Technology

  • For Dynamic LASPS

–Existing Technologies –Move to DECE Common Streaming Technology

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 DECE CONFIDENTIAL

  • 1. Streaming Methods

Straw man approach developed by sub-team for MC consideration

1

All LASPs’ streaming protection methods must obey DECE output rules

2

Three categories of potential streaming methods with different paths to be OK

  • A. DRMs Approved for

Downloads = OK

  • Approved for: HD, SD,

PD

  • Requirement: Assumes

using same technology for streaming as for download

  • Approved List:

Adobe Flash Access 2.0 Marlin OMA Playready Widevine

  • B. Other technologies validated

by market test = “white list”

  • “Approved via market conditions” = for similar

resolution, high value content. (e.g. full HD for PPV/VOD to be stream DECE HD, etc)

  • Approval will be for similar devices that “pass” the

market test (e.g. cable settop), not overall approval

  • f the technology.
  • Group B only used for 1st year approvals,

subsequent technology needs to apply as a Group C

  • Candidate list for HD (and SD, PD)

CA systems: PowerKey (SA/Cisco), NDS, MediaCipher (Motorola), Mediaroom (IPTV), Nagra/Canal+ (TBD), Irdeto (TBD), DVB (TBD), Verimatrix (TBD) DRM: WMDRM, DIVX

  • Candidate list for SD/PD only: Adobe RTMPE +

SWF Verification, Apple Live Streaming*

  • C. Apply for approval vs.

criteria (a la DRM)

  • Not expected to be used

until Version 1.1 timeframe

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 DECE CONFIDENTIAL

Market Test for Adoption

  • Two categories of Test: HD and SD
  • Based on availability: Is the streaming technology being used in the market. The test

would be based on availability in a similar window; (i.e. is it being used for streams before

  • r on the same day as the release of the DVD/BD disc.)
  • Based on which studios are licensing content: Must be content from at least [N] DECE

content studios who license such content using the technology and all endorse its adoption by DECE as an approved streaming method

  • Based on how much content is being licensed: For each licensing DEC studio, at least N

titles (or % of titles they have licensing rights) within the last [n] months for the candidate streaming technology

  • Market Test performed:

Q4’10 - .95 launch date

Q2’11

Q4’11

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 DECE CONFIDENTIAL

Market Test for Removal

  • Two categories of Test: HD and SD
  • Based on LASP availability: No LASP is currently licensed by a studio to use an approved

technology.

  • Based on which studios are no longer licensing content: If [N] of the DECE studios that

were licensing content remove by letter support for an approved streaming technology.

  • Based on how content is being licensed: No test
  • Market Test performed:

Yearly starting in 2011

  • Technology that meet the test are phased out within 1 year
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 DECE CONFIDENTIAL

Issues

  • How to move to common format?

–Sunset certain technologies –Issue for legacy supported streaming devices

  • Can an approved technology be sunsetted?

–To force movement to a common streaming method –Because it is a weak technology –Suggestion – Rights owners can sunset by not doing bilateral rights (issue for form license participants)

  • Can an approved technology be revoked for security or
  • ther issues