Strategies to Improve Teaching in New Mexico
By Thomas J. Kane Walter H. Gale Professor Harvard Graduate School of Education
Strategies to Improve Teaching in New Mexico By Thomas J. Kane - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Strategies to Improve Teaching in New Mexico By Thomas J. Kane Walter H. Gale Professor Harvard Graduate School of Education Outline I. Overview of teacher effectiveness research. Traditional licenses, alternative licenses Licensure
By Thomas J. Kane Walter H. Gale Professor Harvard Graduate School of Education
.03 .06 .09 .12 Proportion of Classrooms
5 10 15 Change in Percentile Rank of Average Student Traditionally Certified Uncertified Alternatively Certified
Note: Classroom-level impacts on average student performance, controlling for baseline scores, student demographics and program participation. LAUSD elementary teachers, grade 2 through 5.
by Initial Certification Teacher Impacts on Math Performance Teach cher ers Dif Differ!
Source: Clark, Melissa A., Hanley S. Chiang, Tim Silva, Sheena McConnell, Kathy Sonnenfeld, Anastasia Erbe, and Michael Puma. (2013). “The Effectiveness of Secondary Math Teachers from Teach For America and the Teaching Fellows Programs” (NCEE 2013- 4015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Source: Clark, Melissa A., Hanley S. Chiang, Tim Silva, Sheena McConnell, Kathy Sonnenfeld, Anastasia Erbe, and Michael Puma. (2013). “The Effectiveness of Secondary Math Teachers from Teach For America and the Teaching Fellows Programs” (NCEE 2013- 4015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Academic qualification Relationship to Student Gains in Math? Attended selective college No Took more math courses in college No Teacher scored higher on Praxis II test of math content knowledge No Teacher had more days of student teaching in math No Teacher had more prior coursework in math pedagogy No Teacher was required to take more coursework while teaching Yes (Negative) Teaching experience Yes (1st to second year)
Fulton County, GA Gwinnett County, GA Los Angeles
.03 .06 .09 .12 Proportion of Classrooms
5 10 15 Change in Percentile Rank of Average Student Bottom 3rd Quartile 2nd Quartile Top Quartile
Note: Classroom-level impacts on average student performance, controlling for baseline scores, student demographics and program participation. LAUSD elementary teachers, < 4 years experience.
by Ranking After First Two Years Teacher Impacts on Math Performance in Third Year
10
.03 .06 .09 .12 Proportion of Classrooms
5 10 15 Change in Percentile Rank of Average Student Bottom 3rd Quartile 2nd Quartile Top Quartile
Note: Classroom-level impacts on average student performance, controlling for baseline scores, student demographics and program participation. LAUSD elementary teachers, < 4 years experience.
by Ranking After First Two Years Teacher Impacts on Math Performance in Third Year
.03 .06 .09 .12 Proportion of Classrooms
5 10 15 Change in Percentile Rank of Average Student Traditionally Certified Uncertified Alternatively Certified
Note: Classroom-level impacts on average student performance, controlling for baseline scores, student demographics and program participation. LAUSD elementary teachers, grade 2 through 5.
by Initial Certification Teacher Impacts on Math Performance
effectiveness at the end of the probationary period.
and practice in classroom management and other practical instructional skills (e.g. “Teach like a Champion”)
and practice in practical skills during the summer and limit course- taking requirements during initial years of teaching.
least once by faculty at another teacher preparation institution. (Using a common rubric.)
ineffective candidates at the end of student teaching.
each teacher preparation institution.