Status Report on Electric Renewable Resource Procurement and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

status report on electric renewable resource procurement
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Status Report on Electric Renewable Resource Procurement and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Status Report on Electric Renewable Resource Procurement and Renewable Portfolio Standard; Update on Senate Bill X1-2 Board of Public Utilities October 21, 2011 Background 2002: Senate Bill 1078 requiring 20% of retail sales from


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Status Report on Electric Renewable Resource Procurement and Renewable Portfolio Standard; Update on Senate Bill X1-2 Board of Public Utilities October 21, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

1

  • 2002: Senate Bill 1078 requiring 20% of retail sales from renewable

energy by 2017.

  • 2003: Riverside becomes first California municipal utility to adopt an

RPS; 15% by 2010 and 20% by 2015.

  • 2006: Senate Bill 107 accelerates date for reaching 20% to 2010.
  • 2007: Riverside adopts revised RPS; 20% by 2010, 25% by 2015, and

33% by 2020.

  • 2008: Governor Schwarzenegger issues Executive Order requiring IOUs

to reach 33% by 2020.

  • 2010: RPU serves 20.7% of its retail load with renewable energy

(including large hydro from Hoover Dam).

  • 2011: Senate Bill X1-2 passed, applying 33% by 2020 requirement to all

utilities including POUs; disallows Hoover.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Existing Long-Term Renewable Resources

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Salton Sea Geothermal Plant

3

  • 46 MW base-load geothermal energy
  • 20 megawatts (MW) in December

2004; increased to 46 MW in June 2009; contract ends 2020

  • Supplies about 18% of retail load
  • Supplies 90% of RPU’s long-term

renewable energy

  • Base-load (24 x 7)
  • Current cost is $61 per megawatt-hour

(MWh)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Hoover Dam

4

  • Began receiving energy in 1987; 30-

year contract ends in 2017

  • Supplies about 1.6% of retail load
  • Generation limited due to low Lake

Mead water levels

  • Helps meet RPU’s peaking needs
  • Currently about $25/MWh
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Wintec Wind Farm

5

  • Wind energy near Palm Springs
  • Deliveries began 2003
  • Expires in 2018
  • Currently 1.3 MW
  • Supplies about 0.2% of retail load
  • Additional 1.3 MW may come on-line

in 2013

  • Current cost is $52/MWh
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Recent RPS Results

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2010

7

2010 Energy Source GWh % of Retail Load Salton Sea 350.6 17.6 % Wintec Wind 4.5 0.2 % Hoover 31.8 1.6 % Firmed and Shaped (Wind) 26.6 1.3 % Total Renewable Energy 413.5 20.7 % Total Retail Load 1,996.2

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2011 to Date

8

2011 Energy Source GWh % of Retail Load Salton Sea 351.3 17.3 % Wintec Wind 4.5 0.2 % Firmed and Shaped (Wind) 20.4 1.0 % Renewable Energy Credits 30.0 1.5 % Total Renewable Energy (State RPS) 406.2 20.0 % Hoover (City-Qualified) Total Renewable Energy (City RPS) 32.0 438.2 1.6 % 21.6 % Total Retail Load 2,034.9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

California Renewable Energy Resources Act (SBX1-2) Procurement Requirements

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SBX1-2 Procurement Requirements

10

  • Signed by the Governor April 2011
  • Defines qualified renewable energy resources:

 Solar, geothermal, wind, biomass, landfill gas, small hydro (<

30 MW)

 Does not include large hydro (> 30 MW)

  • Establishes minimum renewable energy requirements during three

compliance periods:

 Period 1: Average of 20 percent of retail load during 2011-

2013

 Period 2: 25 percent by December 31, 2016  Period 3: 33 percent by December 31, 2020

  • State requirements now exceed City’s RPS
slide-12
SLIDE 12

SBX1-2 Procurement Requirements

11

  • Three portfolio categories:

 Category 1: First point of interconnection in California  Category 2: Firmed and shaped energy scheduled into

California

 Category 3: Unbundled renewable energy credits (RECs) and

  • ther eligible renewable energy products that do not qualify

within Category 1 or 2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SBX1-2 Procurement Requirements

12

  • Sets renewable energy requirements for each compliance period:

 Period 1: At least 50% from Category 1; no more than 25%

from Category 3

 Compliance Period 2: At least 65% from Category 1; no more

than 15% from Category 3

 Compliance Period 3: At least 75% from Category 1; no more

than 10% from Category 3

  • Renewable resource contracts executed before June 1, 2010 count

in full toward meeting the requirements

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Renewable Energy Needs

slide-15
SLIDE 15

RPU Renewable Energy Needs – Annual

Mandates 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 State RPS

20% average in Compliance Period 1 (2011 – 2013) 25% by 12/31/2016, with reasonable interim progress 33% by 12/31/2020, with reasonable interim progress; annually thereafter Energy Forecasts (GWh)

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Retail Load 2,052 2,072 2,088 2,115 2,154 2,200 2,237 2,281 2,325 2,376 Existing Renewables 409 377 382 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 Additional Renewable Energy Needed 2 37 36 26 109 120 162 173 185 352 14

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Renewable Energy Needs – Compliance Period Totals

Additional Renewable Energy Needed as a % of Retail Sales 2011-2013

(% of retail load)

2014-2016

(% of retail load)

2017-2020

(% of retail load)

Category 1 1.16 % 2.57 % 7.09 % Category 2 0.00 % 0.79 % 1.42 % Category 3 0.05 % 0.59 % 0.94 % Total 1.21 % 3.95 % 9.45 %

15

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Current Activities to Procure New Renewable Resources

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Long-Term Procurement Activities

17

  • Participate in renewables requests for proposals (RFPs) issued by

the Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA).

  • SCPPA RFP for long-term renewable resources

 Proposals were due January 31, 2011  Over 200 proposals were received  Included in-state and out-of-state renewables  First-year prices for best in-state resources $85/MWh –

$117/MWh

 Biogas proposals are subject to regulatory uncertainty  Three other proposals remain under consideration by several

SCPPA members

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Long-Term Procurement Activities

18

  • Meet directly with renewable resource developers

 Allows RPU to consider opportunities that become available

during intervals between SCPPA RFPs

 Enables development of customized transactions  Creates possibility for opportunistic procurements  Provides access to market intelligence

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Long-Term Procurement Activities

19

  • Preparing to issue RFQ/RFP for development of photovoltaic

project at Tequesquite Landfill

 8-10 MW capacity would produce about 0.7% of RPU’s retail

load

 Meets content requirements for Category 1  Would come on-line by 2013, if competitive

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Short-Term Procurement Activities

20

  • Resources conducted a short-term RFP in August 2011
  • Short-term purchases of renewable energy products to help meet

RPS requirements during Compliance Period 1

  • Six responses; three chosen:

 20 GWh firmed and shaped wind (Category 2) – Iberdrola  20 GWh firmed and shaped wind (Category 2) – Powerex  30 GWh renewable energy credits (Category 3) – Idaho Power

  • Incremental cost of ‘green’ attributes about $500,000
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Market Challenges for Procuring Renewable Resources

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Market Challenges for Renewable Resources

22

  • Governor’s plan calls for development of 12,000 MW of distributed

renewable resources

  • Proposed in-state renewable interconnection requests at the ISO

exceed 52,000 MW:

 36,000 MW solar  16,000 MW wind  350 MW geothermal  90 MW biomass

  • “30% of long-term RPS contracts (10 years or more) approved by the

CPUC have been cancelled.” – August CEC report

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Renewables Market

23

  • Many renewable developers unable to obtain financing

 Project development risks  Lack of capital sources

  • RPU renewable projects that have not materialized

 Wintec Phase 2  Shoshone  La Paz

  • Other SCPPA utilities also subject to project failures/risks

 Shoshone (Anaheim)  La Paz (Anaheim, Azusa, Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena)  Raser – developer bankruptcy (Anaheim, Burbank, Glendale,

LADWP, Pasadena)

 Biogas – regulatory uncertainty (Anaheim, Burbank, Glendale,

LADWP, Pasadena)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Potential Cost Impacts to Meet RPS Requirements

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Preliminary Estimate of Potential Cost Impacts

25

Incremental Costs for Renewable Attributes Incremental Cost ($/MWh) Category 1 $52 Category 2 $8 Category 3 $5

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Preliminary Estimate of Potential Cost Impacts

26

Incremental Cost for Renewable Energy Needed 2011-2013 2014-2016 2017-2020 Category 1 $3.74 million $8.63 million $34.01 million Category 2 $0 $0.41 million $1.05 million Category 3 $0.01 million $0.19 million $0.44 million Total $3.75 million $9.23 million $35.50 million Rate Impact 2% 2% 10%

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Regulatory Rulemaking for SBX1-2 Implementation

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Regulatory Rulemaking Processes

28

  • California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Rulemaking

 Rules for IOUs  May create significant precedents for publicly-owned utilities  Started in June; will continue into 2012

  • California Energy Commission (CEC) Rulemaking

 Rules for publicly owned utilities  Started in June; will continue through June 2012  CEC issued concept paper August 22, 2011  Impacts local control  Addressing through CMUA

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Compliance Requirements for Publicly Owned Utilities Under SBX1-2

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Enforcement Program

30

  • SBX1-2 requires local governing board of each POU to adopt an

enforcement program by January 1, 2012

  • Measures that the local governing board may adopt include:

 Cost limitations for procurement expenditures  Conditions to allow delaying compliance (e.g., circumstances

that delay development or delivery of renewables)

 Rules to apply excess procurement from one compliance

period to subsequent compliance periods

  • POU must take all necessary action to achieve compliance
  • Adoption of RPU’s enforcement program

 Consideration by Utility Board: November 18, 2011  Consideration by City Council: December 6, 2011

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Procurement Plan

31

  • SBX1-2 also requires each POU to develop a renewable resources

procurement plan

 Must be prepared annually  Identify mechanism(s) to be used for procurement  Status update on projects under development

  • RPU to develop its initial renewable resources procurement plan

in 2012

  • Will bring to Board by July 2012