Status report on Cosmic Ray Tagger for 3x1x1/6x6x6, and observation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

status report on cosmic ray tagger for 3x1x1 6x6x6 and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Status report on Cosmic Ray Tagger for 3x1x1/6x6x6, and observation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Status report on Cosmic Ray Tagger for 3x1x1/6x6x6, and observation of upward going particles in WA105 I. Kreslo LBNODEMO/WA105 bi-weekly science board meeting 12.10.2016 1 Reference documents for the CRT design


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Status report on Cosmic Ray Tagger for 3x1x1/6x6x6, and

  • bservation of upward going particles in WA105
  • I. Kreslo

LBNODEMO/WA105 bi-weekly science board meeting 12.10.2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Reference documents for the CRT design http://lbnodemo.ethz.ch:2500/3x1x1/35 :

  • 1. feb-v3-0-1.pdf: description of FE electronics and communication
  • 2. sbnd-crt-part1,2: technical design note for SBND CRT (90% compatible)
  • 3. missing: 3D CAD model for 3x1x1
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Scintillating module 16 strips per module Strip width: 112 mm Strip length: 1755mm Module size: 1.8x1.8m Aluminum case (2 mm thick)

Feed-through PCB 32 coax cables inside

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Scintillating strip Scintillator: USMS-03 (PS+PTP+POPOP) Reflective surface (UNIPLAST technology) WLS fibers: Kuraray Y11(200)MS, 1mm diameter Optical glue: ESA 7250 polysiloxane compound SiPM: Hamamatsu S12825-050P 2 SiPMs per strip

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Front-End Board Rev3 180 pieces produced, tested. (50 for uBooNE + 130 for SBND) 20 more are ordered.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Plane geometry

1800 1800 112 1792 1755 12 33 4

CH0 CH15

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Installation at 3x1x1 cryostat

7.3m 1.800m 1.545m 1.910m 1.565m 1.930m

Position precision ±3 mm

20.0mm 100.0mm

Gate side (S) Wall side (N)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Timing reference signal distribution 065 066 065 068 070

CH 0 TIN TOUT T0 T1 TIN TOUT T0 T1

TIN TOUT T0 T1 TIN TOUT T0 T1

WR PPS 10 ns 70 ns 10 ns

TODO: install WR Client unit for PPS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Trigger signal distribution 065 066 065 068 070

CH 0 TIN TOUT T0 T1 TIN TOUT T0 T1

TIN TOUT T0 T1 TIN TOUT T0 T1

X1 COINC LOGIC Y1 Y2 X2 TRIG TO TPC

Each pair works in local X-Y coinc. mode Triggers from each plane delivered to logic unit, any coinc. logic can be realized there for TPC TODO: replace TTL-NIM-TTL check logic unit eventually replace with Bern unit

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Data readout 065 066 065 068 070

J1 J2 J1 J2 J1 J2 J1 J2

DAQ SERVER

eth1 CAT5 ethernet cable

Event: flags ts0, ns (time w.r.t T0) ts1, ns (time w.r.t T1, not used) ADC[32]

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Upward-going muons(?) TOF resolution ~4.4 ns Muon TOF test results (~6 days accumulated) Detected muon flux: N->S direction: ~3.1 muons/min S->N direction: ~3.6 muons/min

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Muon flux angular distribution

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Upward going muons at surface ( literature refs )

  • Lack of information or not very reliable measurements
  • PDG review on cosmic rays says almost nothing about flux near horizon
  • “Effects of upward-going cosmic muons on density radiography of volcanoes”
  • K. Jourde et al., arXiv:1307.6758v1
  • Monte Carlo simulation for

background study of geophysical inspection with cosmic-ray muons,

  • R. Nishiyama et al.,
  • Geophys. J. Int. (2016) 206, 1039–1050

Question remains: Low or high energy? (Scattered or through-going?)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Upward going muons at 3x1x1 Proposal:

measure energy spectrum of particles near (below) horizon with the TPC data. (if fast- delta ray count, delta ray spectrum, shower reco; if slow - MCS, dE/dx) Clarify “through-going vs scattered” dilemma.

N->S S->N