States of Style Psych Press News What is Leadership? Communication - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

states of style
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

States of Style Psych Press News What is Leadership? Communication - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Leadership Finesse: States of Style Psych Press News What is Leadership? Communication is something so simple and difficult that we can never put it in simple words Influence T.S. Matthews Guide Command Leadership Styles Depends


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Leadership Finesse: States of Style

Psych Press News

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What is Leadership?

“Communication is something so simple and difficult that we can never put it in simple words”

T.S. Matthews Command Guide Influence

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Leadership Styles

  • Depends on…

– Who takes responsibility – Nature of the relationship with the employee – Employee’s willingness and ability – Focus on the task

Delegate Sell Participate Tell

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Leadership versus Management

  • Management and

leadership are complementary approaches

  • Managers maintain the

business while leaders navigate the environment

Managers… maintain, monitor, comply Leaders… question, explore, encourage

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Transactional Leader or Manager?

  • Management focuses on

ensuring current policies and procedures are followed

  • Transactional leadership

focuses on improving performance within the current paradigm

  • Transformational

leadership seeks to improve performance through questioning current paradigm

Management Transactional Leadership Transformational Leadership

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Transaction versus Transformation

  • Transactional

Leadership

– Focuses on rewarding performance once it happens

  • Transformational

Leadership

– Focuses on inspiring performance into new directions

“I think leadership is creating a state of mind in

  • thers”
  • Barbara Mikulski
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Further Reading

  • Avolio, B.J., Walumbwa, F.O., & Weber, T.J.(2009)

“Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions” in Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421- 449.