state water resources control board recycled water
play

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD RECYCLED WATER FUNDING FOR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD RECYCLED WATER FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 October 18, 2018 Presented by: Michael Downey Division of Financial Assistance (DF A) Overview Funding Programs WRFP Funding S ources Prop 1


  1. STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD RECYCLED WATER FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 October 18, 2018 Presented by: Michael Downey Division of Financial Assistance (DF A)

  2. Overview • Funding Programs • WRFP Funding S ources • Prop 1 • Prop 68 • Prop 3 • Clean Wat er S RF • Proposed CWS RF Policy Updates • Proposed S coring S yst em • Fundable List

  3. Funding Programs

  4. Funding Programs & Applications Planning/Design Application Clean Water Water/Energy State Revolving Audit Fund Application Wastewater Construction Application Planning Grant Application Water Recycling Funding Pilot Project Program Grant Application

  5. WRFP Funding Sources

  6. Initial Allowance: • Construction Grant - $312.5 million • Construction Loan - $256 million • Research & Development - $12.5 million Current Balance: • Available grant funding has been committed • Available loan ($122 million) will be committed this fiscal year (FY 18/19) • Grant from repayments/disencumber will be committed in FY 19/20

  7. Expected Allowance: • $2 million for planning grant • $50 million for construction grant • $22 million for construction loan • Not included in FY 18/19 budget (FY 2019/20 earliest could be available)

  8. If approved would provide $400 million for Water Recycling • $200 million construction grant Prop 3 • Up to 1% for research • Up to 10% for planning 2018 Ballot Measure • Not included in FY 18/19 budget (FY 2019/20 earliest could be available)

  9. • Annual Funding Target of $1 billion • Principal Forgiveness (PF) available for: • Small Disadvantaged Communities • Green Project Reserve • Green Infrastructure • Water Efficiency (water recycling projects are categorically eligible) • Energy Efficiency • Environmentally Innovative • PF Limits • 50% of eligible costs up to $4 million max • $2.5 million max for water recycling projects • Cannot award PF if receiving grant funding

  10. Proposed CWSRF Policy Amendment

  11. Background • Policy covers CWS RF and complement ary financing • Last Amended on February 17, 2015 • Hist orical Average: 2 – 3 years • Demand on t he CWS RF has great ly increased • >$8 billion 1

  12. • Priorit ize applicat ions • Maint ain sust ainable finances • Addit ional flexibilit y t o deal wit h wide range of borrower credit s Drivers • Consist ency bet ween CWS RF and DWS RF Policies • More t imely funding decisions

  13. Fundable List • Only proj ects on Fundable List will be eligible for financing • S mall S DAC, S mall DAC, and Public Health Proj ects automatically Fundable; not subj ect to scoring • All other applications will be ranked by “ Priority S core” • All applications will be scored – complete & incomplete

  14.  125% • 90% of sustainable funding level ~ $ 1.0 billion/ year • Execute agreements for all Fundable Fundable applications by end of fiscal year List • Applications roll over if not funded

  15. Process DFA Draft IUP; completes Scores Applicants IUP management scoring compiled Public Address review approval; adopted worksheet and Review comments worksheets brief Board by Board for each analyzed members Project

  16. Scoring System • Priority S core will be the sum of three components: 1. Primary S core, 2. S econdary S core, and 3. Readiness S core • Maximum Priority S core = 16

  17. 1. Primary S core Purpose Resource Corrective Preventive Improvement Drinking Water Source 9 8 7 Delta Water Quality 8 7 7 Water Recycling -- -- 7 Impaired Water Body 8 6 4 Water Quality Control 8 6 4 Plan or Permit • All applicat ions receive a Primary S core • One number is select ed from t he t able • Applicat ions t hat do not fit int o any cat egory will receive a Primary S core of “ 2”

  18. 2. S econdary S core • May receive S econdary S core • One number is selected from the table • If no criteria are met, S econdary S core = “ 0”

  19. 3. Readiness S core Application or Design Status Score Complete Application Received by the Division 2 Plans and Specifications as verified by Division If > 49% = 1, or staff if > 89% = 2 • All applications receive Readiness S core • Add the two parts together • If application incomplete, Application Readiness = 0 • If P & S < 50 % , Construction Readiness = 0 • Design-build or similar construction procurement will be counted as 100% P & S NOTE: Fundable applications that had an incomplete application and P & S < 49% may be subj ect to deadlines for submitting the complete application and substantial P & S to remain on the Fundable List.

  20. Priority S core Calculation Example: Critical Improvements at a WWTP Primary Score: Verify the purpose of the project and the resource or impact associated with the project Primary Score = 6 Project would prevent future water quality permit violations Secondary Score: Verify which secondary characteristic best describes the project The applicant has adopted a detailed Climate Change Action Plan; Secondary Score = 3 the Project would help implement the plan’s objectives Readiness Score: Verify the status of the application and Plans & Specifications Application Status: 100 % complete; Application Readiness = 2 Readiness Score = 4 P & S Status: 100% Complete; Construction Readiness = 2 Priority Score = Primary Score + Secondary Score + Readiness Score Priority Score = 13

  21. Developing the Fundable List • It erat ive Process • Aft er applicant s review scores, all scores will be compiled and sort ed highest t o lowest • Applicat ions wit h t he same score eit her Fundable or not Fundable • Pick a cut off score: • If t ot al $ < 90% of funding t arget , pick a lower score , t hen ✓ • If t ot al $ > 90% and < 125% • If t ot al $ > 125% , t hen modify scores = or > proposed cut off score

  22. S coring Modifications • 2 Pot ent ial modificat ions • If Draft Fundable List > 125% of t arget , t hen add point s for communit y st at us • Only t o t hose = or > proposed cut off score • If st ill > 125% , t hen part ial financing is applied • 100% funding t o great est ext ent • Part ial funding applied uniformly

  23. Credit Review • Allow Deputy Director discretion in cases where applicants have existing debt programs and are highly rated • Can accept existing definitions and covenants • New Credit Review appendix (Appendix N) • Allows Deputy Director to update process consistent with Policy requirements • Debt S ervice Coverage • Increased senior and parity coverage from 1.1 to 1.2 times • Lowered subordinate coverage to 1.0 times

  24. Other Changes 1. Eligible S tart Date • Redefining term to allow construction costs to be eligible starting with Notice to Proceed 2. Planning/ Design Loans • Changing from refinance to restructure to match DWS RF Policy • Also, Planning/ Design Loan Application is subj ect to scoring and must be on Fundable List

  25. Other Changes (cont.) 3. Align Water Conservation and Management with current S tate Law • Water S uppliers must certify meeting Division 6 of Water Code • Non-Water S uppliers must certify that area water suppliers meet Division 6 4. Dropping Pledged Revenues Fund Resolution, but must submit a closing resolution consistent with Gov. Code §5852.1

  26. Other Changes (cont.) 5. Appraisal requirement dropped for purchase of land or easements, but will be required if land is used as security 6. Policy generalized to apply to all types of proj ect (i.e., “ Proj ect” Financing) • No longer using term “ Expanded Use” Proj ects 7. Pre-Payments require consent

  27. Pros • Bet t er manage demand on CWS RF Program • Maint ain st rong finances • Allow applicant s t o self-score and self- select applicat ions • Credit Reviews • Improve clarit y and t ransparency of financial review process • Improve consist ency bet ween CWS RF and DWS RF

  28. Cons • New scoring system will require adaptation from applicants and DF A staff • S coring system may produce unpredictable results • Adj ustments or improvements may be needed

  29. Schedule Task Date(s) Remarks Begin Comment Review Period 9/ 14/ 2018 Draft Policy posted on the web Central Valley Regional Water 9/ 18/ 2018 Quality Control Board S takeholder Workshops 9/ 21/ 2018 East Bay Municipal Utility District 9/ 25/ 2018 Irvine Ranch Water District End Comment Review Period 10/ 19/ 2018 At noon Board considers Policy 11/ 27/ 2018 Regular Board meeting amendment Based on applications as of S coring January 2019 12/31/2018 Draft S FY 2019-2020 Int ended Early April Use Plan posted on the web 2019 Adoption of S FY 2019-2020 June 2019 Int ended Use Plan

  30. Thank Y ou Michael Downey, P .E., Senior Engineer S tate Water Resources Control Board Division of Financial Assistance Water Recycling Funding Program 1001 I S treet, 16th Floor, S acramento, CA 95814 (916) 324-8404

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend