SLIDE 1
State Street Corridor Study
Project Stakeholder Meeting
October 22, 2015
AGENDA
- Study Goals
- Alternatives Overview
- Performance
- Evaluation
- Next Steps
State Street Corridor Study Project Stakeholder Meeting October 22, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
State Street Corridor Study Project Stakeholder Meeting October 22, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
State Street Corridor Study Project Stakeholder Meeting October 22, 2015 A GENDA Study Goals Alternatives Overview Performance Evaluation Next Steps S TUDY G OALS Safety: Provide safe conditions for all travelers Entry: Create a
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
STUDY GOALS
Safety: Provide safe conditions for all travelers
Entry: Create a more attractive entry to the city Pedestrians: Improve conditions for pedestrians along/across State St Bicycles: Provide a safe place for bicyclists separate from travel lanes Transit: Enhance transit conditions through traffic flow, stop accessibility Vehicles: Maintain reasonable traffic operations along the corridor Land Use: Support planned land use described in S. State St. Corridor Plan Access: Ease accessibility of corridor businesses
SLIDE 4
ALTERNATIVES OVERVIE
IEW
- Alternative 1: Narrow Median with Direct
Left Turns
- Alternative 2: Narrow Median with
Roundabout Intersections
- Alternative 3: Wide Median with Indirect
(“Michigan”) Left Turns
SLIDE 5
COMMON DESIG
IGN FEATURES
- Curbside buffered bike lanes
- Continuous sidewalks
- Transit stop pull-outs (where feasible)
- No right-of-way impacts beyond minor
corner encroachments
SLIDE 6
ALTERNATIVE 1 1 - NARROW MEDIAN
- Direct left-turns
- No u-turns
- Plantable
median space
SLIDE 7
ALTERNATIVE 1 1 - NARROW MEDIAN
SLIDE 8
ALTERNATIVE 1 1 - NARROW MEDIAN
SLIDE 9
ALTERNATIVE 1 TRAFFIC MANEUVERS
EXISTING ALTERNATIVE 1 Vehicle turning movement Pedestrian movement across State St No Turn Allowed
SLIDE 10
ALTERNATIVE 1 TRAFFIC MANEUVERS
EXISTING ALTERNATIVE 1 Vehicle turning movement Pedestrian movement across State St No Turn Allowed
SLIDE 11
ALTERNATIVE 2 2 - ROUNDABOUTS
- Roundabout
intersections
- Plantable narrow
median space
SLIDE 12
ALTERNATIVE 2 2 - ROUNDABOUTS
SLIDE 13
ALTERNATIVE 2 2 - ROUNDABOUTS
SLIDE 14
ALTERNATIVE 2 TRAFFIC MANEUVERS
EXISTING ALTERNATIVE 2 Vehicle turning movement Pedestrian movement across State St No Turn Allowed
SLIDE 15
ALTERNATIVE 2 TRAFFIC MANEUVERS
EXISTING ALTERNATIVE 2 Vehicle turning movement Pedestrian movement across State St No Turn Allowed
SLIDE 16
ALTERNATIVE 3 3 – WID
IDE MEDIAN
- Indirect
(“Michigan”) left turns
- Plantable
wide median space
SLIDE 17
ALTERNATIVE 3 3 – WID
IDE MEDIAN
SLIDE 18
ALTERNATIVE 3 3 – WID
IDE MEDIAN
SLIDE 19
ALTERNATIVE 3 TRAFFIC MANEUVERS
EXISTING ALTERNATIVE 3 Vehicle turning movement Pedestrian movement across State St No Turn Allowed
SLIDE 20
ALTERNATIVE 3 TRAFFIC MANEUVERS
EXISTING ALTERNATIVE 3 Vehicle turning movement Pedestrian movement across State St No Turn Allowed
SLIDE 21
SLIDE 22
I-94 INTERCHANGE OPTIO
IONS
Alternative A: Narrow Median Configuration
SLIDE 23
I-94 INTERCHANGE OPTIO
IONS
Alternative A: Roundabout Configuration
SLIDE 24
I-94 INTERCHANGE OPTIO
IONS
Alternative A: Park-and-Ride Option
Park and Ride Lot
SLIDE 25
Alternatives were scored based on how well they achieve the project goals
SLIDE 26
PLANNED OAKBROOK EXTENSION
SLIDE 27
GIV
IVE US US YOUR FEEDBACK!
- Talk one-on-one with our team
- Provide input on which study goals are
most important to you
- Rate and provide feedback on the project
alternatives
SLIDE 28
NEXT STEPS
- Project team will use analysis and
feedback to select a recommended alternative
- Further preliminary design will be
conducted
- Recommended alternative will be