State and Local Data Impacting Self Sufficiency for Hoosiers Jessica - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

state and local data impacting self sufficiency for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

State and Local Data Impacting Self Sufficiency for Hoosiers Jessica - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

State and Local Data Impacting Self Sufficiency for Hoosiers Jessica Fraser, Director, Indiana Institute for Working Families Good Good New News: Poverty decreased from 14.1% in 2016 to 13.5% in 2017 Bad Bad New News: Poverty is still higher


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

State and Local Data Impacting Self‐Sufficiency for Hoosiers

Jessica Fraser, Director, Indiana Institute for Working Families

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Good Good New News: Poverty decreased from 14.1% in 2016 to 13.5% in 2017 Bad Bad New News: Poverty is still higher than in 2007 or 2000

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Economic Self‐Sufficiency Is More Than the Absence of

  • Poverty. And at 31.5%, Indiana’s rate of low‐income

families is still far above its pre‐recession level.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

But jobs aren’t enough to for Hoosiers to be self‐sufficient. At 31.8%, Indiana has the highest proportion of working poor families among all 12 Midwestern states, up from 5th‐highest in the Midwest since 2007.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The problem: basic costs have increased by an average of 31.9% for a family of 3 since 2009, but household incomes have only increased 6.3%.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Indiana’s low‐wage jobs problem will take all of us working together to overcome!

  • Strategic initiatives
  • Innovative Programs
  • Data Driven Policy Change
  • Partnerships (stranger the bedfellows the better)
slide-8
SLIDE 8

The state’s own projections show the rate of low‐wage occupations will increase to 69.1% in 2026, up from 63.1% in 2017.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A path forward: focus efforts on opening pathways to high‐demand, high‐wage, middle‐skill occupations

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Removing Barriers to Post‐Secondary Attainment is Critical to Reducing Poverty and Opening Pathways to Higher‐Wage Jobs

CHILD CARE IS THE LARGEST COST FOR WORKING FAMILIES, and the cost and lack of access prevents many new parents from starting training programs. The attending rate for adults with children under 5 is only 8.3 percent, but is 31.4 percent for those with kids ages 5‐17 (school‐age). HOUSING INSECURITY AND HOMELESSNESS: Affordable housing is a barrier for would‐be adult students, many of whom are low‐income. 43.9 percent of Indiana renters spend 30 percent or more of their income on rent and utilities on housing and utilities, a major risk factor for housing insecurity. Across the Midwest, 48 percent of community college students are housing insecure, and 12 percent are homeless. Non‐Academic Barriers to Career Pathways

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Why coordinated Workforce, Higher Ed, and Supportive Services policy matters!

  • Poverty has not returned to pre‐recession levels!
  • Basic Costs have grown faster than wages.
  • Low‐income adults lack educational attainment…
  • … and yet have many barriers to improving their educational

attainment

  • Employers need a skilled workforce.
  • The opportunities for Low‐income adults to get sub‐baccalaureate

training that leads to family‐sustaining wages are immense.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

A Closer Look…

Poverty Rate Boone 5.20% Hamilton 3.50% Hancock 4.90% Hendricks 4.50% Johnson 10.10% Marion 17.10% Morgan 9.70% Poverty By Race White alone Black or African American alone Hispanic or Latino origin (of any race) Hamilton 3.30% 4.20% 17.20% Marion 17.10% 24.40% 25.90%

Suburban Counties experience much less poverty than the State Average.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Deep Poverty Poverty Rate Below SS Boone 2.68% 5.20% 14.01% Hamilton 1.73% 3.50% 10.86% Hancock 1.59% 4.90% 18.12% Hendricks 1.57% 4.50% 16.65% Johnson 4.68% 10.10% 20.80% Marion 8.36% 17.10% 39.39% Morgan 3.92% 9.70% 24.40% 30‐34 % of Income on Rent More than 35% of Income on Rent Boone 11% 24% Hamilton 8.50% 27.60% Hancock 7.80% 38% Hendricks 10.20% 31.00% Johnson 10.50% 21.90% Marion 10.10% 41.20% Morgan 8.80% 22.40% Some Suburban Counties have higher than expected rates of residents between the Poverty line and self‐sufficiency. This is the benefit cliff population, the population that is struggling but for whom there may not be government supports. All of these counties have 30% or MORE of renters spending more than 30% of their monthly income on rent. This is the definition of Housing Cost Burdened and is a metric of Housing Insecurity. We will take a closer look at some of this data coming up….

slide-14
SLIDE 14

A Deep Dive…

While Suburban counties have much lower poverty Rates overall, than their urban and even rural counter Parts… They do still have pockets of poverty that should Be addressed. In the two census tracts in dark green, the poverty rate Is higher than the state average for 2016.

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Questions… Discussion…..

Contact Us….

jfraser@incap.org

slide-18
SLIDE 18