!1
Star formation in the Local Group Guido De Marchi (ESA), Nino - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Star formation in the Local Group Guido De Marchi (ESA), Nino - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Star formation in the Local Group Guido De Marchi (ESA), Nino Panagia (STScI) Elena Sabbi (STScI), Giacomo Beccari (ESO) and NIRSpec GTO team ! 1 Motivation Solar mass stars account for most of the star formation in galaxies
Motivation
- Solar mass stars account for most of the
star formation in galaxies
- Low mass stars can form in small clouds
as well as in big ones, and form on longer timescale than massive stars
- Need to probe diverse environments,
Magellanic Clouds crucial for metallicity
- At redshift z~2, environment was similar to
Magellanic Clouds
!2
Low-mass stars grow in mass over time through accretion of matter from a circumstellar disc (e.g. Lynden-Bell & Pringle 1974; Bertout 1989) Typical signature: UV, IR and Hα excess emission How to measure it? Need spectroscopy Well calibrated relationship between L(Hα) and Lacc
PMS stars: How to find them?
Spectroscopic search
signs of accretion
!4
Until JWST only feasible in the Milky Way
In the meanwhile…
Powerful method combines HST broad- (V, I ) and narrow- band (Hα) photometry and allows us to:
- identify all objects with Hα excess emission
- derive accretion luminosity and mass accretion rates
- for hundreds of stars simultaneously
De Marchi, Panagia & Romaniello 2010, ApJ, 715, 1 Beccari, Spezzi, De Marchi et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, 1108 De Marchi, Panagia & Sabbi 2011, ApJ, 740, 10 De Marchi, Panagia, Romaniello et al. 2011, ApJ, 740, 11 Spezzi, De Marchi, Panagia et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 78 De Marchi, Beccari & Panagia 2013, ApJ, 775, 68 Beccari, De Marchi, Panagia et al. 2015, A&A, 574, A44 De Marchi, Panagia & Beccari 2017, ApJ, 846, 110 Biazzo, Beccari, De Marchi, Panagia 2019, ApJ, 875, 51
!6
- In massive young clusters in the local group thousands PMS stars continue
to accrete much longer than the few Myr typical of nearby associations
De Marchi et al. 2011b, 2011c, 2013
gives L(Hα)
30 Dor (LMC) NGC 346 (SMC) De Marchi et al. 2011a, 2017
- These PMS stars are discovered from broad-band (V, I) and narrow-band (Hα)
photometry and show strong Hα excess emission due to ongoing accretion
Actively accreting PMS stars
!7
5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 5000 10000 15000 20000 X Y
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Accretion rate and metallicity
~ 200 pc HTTP (Sabbi et al. 2014, 2016) Hodge 301 NGC 2060 R 136
Hα photometry
De Marchi, Panagia & Beccari 2017
R136 Cluster within r < 20 pc ~1,000 stars
!9
Hα photometry
Tarantula Nebula within r < 120 pc ~14,000 stars
De Marchi, Panagia, Sabbi, et al. (in prep) !10
Tarantula
De Marchi, Panagia, Sabbi, et al. (in prep) !11
PMS stars in the Tarantula
AV=1
2 Myr 4 8 16 32
De Marchi, Panagia, Sabbi, et al. (in prep) !12
14,000 and counting…
Tarantula
11
UV U V J I H De Marchi et al. 2016
Reddening vector in all bands
!13
- Not just a few lines of sight, but thousands!
- Additional grey component, excess of big grains
De Marchi & Panagia 2019, 2014; De Marchi et al. 2016
Galactic ISM
Extinction law at optical and infrared
!14
AV=1
2 Myr 4 8 16 32
De Marchi, Panagia, Sabbi, et al. (in prep) !15
14,000 and counting…
Tarantula
11
> 16 Myr < 8 Myr
De Marchi, Panagia, Sabbi, et al. (in prep) !16
Tarantula
12
14,000 and counting…
H301 R136 NGC 2060
N E
< 8 Myr
N E
> 16 Myr
N E
Multiple generations ubiquitous
- Multi-generation pattern always seen, Δt ~ 10 Myr
- Younger PMS stars always more concentrated
- Older PMS stars always more widely distributed
De Marchi et al. 2013 De Marchi et al. 2011b
NGC602 in SMC NGC346 in SMC
!18
Accretion evolution with time
De Marchi, Panagia, Beccari 2017 R 136
!19
Accretion evolution with time
Hartmann et al. 1998
Sicilia-Aguilar et al. 2006; 2010
!20
Accretion evolution with time
De Marchi, Panagia, Beccari 2017 R 136
!21
Accretion evolution with time
!22
De Marchi, Panagia, Beccari 2017 R 136
Accretion evolution with time
!22
De Marchi, Panagia, Beccari 2017 R 136
SMC LMC MW
De Marchi, Panagia & Beccari 2017
Accretion rate and metallicity
!23
LH 95
N E
!25
10 σV
NE field NW field
Hα variability
SE field SW field
!26 De Marchi, Panagia, Sabbi (in prep)
Hα variability
Stars with 5 Hα epochs
- < 8 Myr
- 8–16 Myr
- > 16 Myr
bright faint
Hα fluctuation [mag] Hα brightness [mag]
!27
< 8 Myr > 16 Myr
Hα variability
Richert, Lyra & Kuchner 2017
- < 8 Myr
- 8–16 Myr
- > 16 Myr
!29 De Marchi, Panagia, Sabbi (in prep)
Hα variability: a Poisson toy-model
Hα fluctuation [mag] Hα brightness [mag]
- < 8 Myr
- 8–16 Myr
- > 16 Myr
Average accretion in Mirandas per week
!29 De Marchi, Panagia, Sabbi (in prep)
20 4 64 1
Miranda: ~ 5 x 10 –11 M◉
Hα variability: a Poisson toy-model
Hα fluctuation [mag] Hα brightness [mag]
6
Looking ahead with JWST
N E
NGC 3603 (MW) 30 Dor (LMC) NGC 346 (SMC)
Spectra of ~100 stars per field, easy with NIRSpec: R~1000–2700, 1.7 – 3.0 μm, include Paα, Brβ, Brγ Photometry of thousands of stars in Paα, Brα with NIRCam Rich sample of younger and older PMS stars
!30
N E
7
Fitting targets in microshutters
7
13
Pa α
G235M (R~1000) for line luminosity G235H (R~2700) for gas kinematics
KAB~22 Br γ Br β
Observations: spectral features
!32
NIRCam will cover fields about 7.5 arcmin from NIRSpec, still plenty
- f star formation going on in those regions!
Broad- and narrow-band (Pa α, Br α) imaging to identify PMS stars that are accreting. Same as we did with HST Hα photometry.
Coordinated parallels
Pa α Br α F150W F182M F277W F430M
!33
- Multi-generation patterns common in all regions, Δt ~ 10 Myr, younger
generations are always more concentrated
- Extinction in starburst cluster is temporarily altered by SNe-II for Δt ~ 50 –
100 Myr after star formation episode
- Mass accretion rate depends on metallicity, at low metallicity stars accrete
more and longer, sizeable fraction of stellar mass accreted during PMS phase
- Accretion process is discrete and made up of a number of clumps all with
a similar mass (~ Miranda)
Summary
!34