Stakeholder engagement and transparency August 2015 Matt Smith - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stakeholder engagement and transparency
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Stakeholder engagement and transparency August 2015 Matt Smith - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stakeholder engagement and transparency August 2015 Matt Smith Environment Division NOPSEMA Overview Introduction Presentation and Q&A: The work program Presentation and Q&A: The next initiative Brainstorming:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Stakeholder engagement and transparency

August 2015 Matt Smith

Environment Division – NOPSEMA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

  • Introduction
  • Presentation and Q&A: The work program
  • Presentation and Q&A: The next initiative
  • Brainstorming: Future initiatives
  • Close @ 1130

2 A422745

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Problem solving approach

3 A422745

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What’s the problem?

4 A422745

Step 1 & 2: Identify. Analyse. Inspection outcomes

Non-compliance Compliance

Community expectations

Not met Met

Review findings

More than one None

ADJR Statement of Reasons requests

Increasing Decreasing

Complaints

Increasing Decreasing

Third-party correspondence

Increasing Decreasing

Freedom of Information requests

Increasing Decreasing

PROBLEM Don’t know NO PROBLEM

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Step 1: Identify the problem

6 A422745

Problems Aims Strategies

A wide range of and some poor consultation practices leading to a loss of trust Transparency of decision making not meeting community expectations

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Step 2: Analyse the problem

7 A422745

Problems Aims Strategies

A wide range of and some poor consultation practices leading to a loss of trust Deliver effective consultation processes to ensure stakeholder views are taken into account Transparency of decision making not meeting community expectations Build a view of trust in the community of

  • ffshore petroleum

environment management

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Step 3: Measuring success

8 A422745

Step 3: Measure.

PROBLEM Don’t know NO PROBLEM

Third-party correspondence

Increasing Decreasing

Freedom of Information requests

Increasing Decreasing

Complaints

Increasing Decreasing

ADJR Statement of Reasons requests

Increasing Decreasing

Community expectations

Not met Met

Review findings

More than one None

Inspection outcomes

Non-compliance Compliance

      

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Step 4: Develop strategies

9 A422745

Problems Aims Strategies

A wide range of and some poor consultation practices leading to a loss of trust Deliver effective consultation processes to ensure stakeholder views are taken into account Promote and ensure titleholders provide the right information, to the right persons, at the right time Maintain collaborative relationships with government to ensure meaningful consultation by industry Transparency of decision making not meeting community expectations Build a view of trust in the community of

  • ffshore petroleum

environment management Create a more open offshore petroleum regime Develop better ways to deliver regulatory services to the community

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Completed initiatives

10 A422745

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Next steps

11 A422745

We are here…

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The benefits

  • Improved confidence in the offshore petroleum industry
  • Reduced risk of decisions being successfully challenged
  • Less resources required for effective consultation
  • Fewer negative interactions between titleholders and

stakeholders

  • Demonstrated social license to operate/regulate
  • Reduction in assessment timeframes
  • High certainty in assessment timeframes

12 A422745

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Questions on the work program?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Stakeholder engagement and transparency: The next initiative

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Aim

  • To solidify the decisions made within the EP

preparation and assessment process by:

– Reducing the range of consultation practices across industry – Gaining a deeper understanding of what constitutes ‘appropriate and effective’ consultation – Making sure external context features heavily in environmental impact and risk assessments.

17 A422745

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Stakeholder engagement: The full picture

18 A422745

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Submission in Jan 2012

19 A422745

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Improving consultation and transparency

20 A422745

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The future

21 A422745

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The material

23 A422745

  • Update: Consultation requirements guidance note
  • Update: EP summary guideline
  • Update: Decision notifications
  • Update: NOPSEMA website
  • Survey: Benchmarking and feedback/ideas
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Consultation process

25 A422745

Please submit feedback to feedback@nopsema.gov.au by no later than 23 September 2015 in any of the below forms:

  • Tracked changes in documents
  • Letter
  • Email.
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Questions on the next initiative?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Brainstorming session

  • Consider aims and strategies and answer ‘what

could be done to deliver on these strategies’?

– The industry – The regulator – Policy-makers – Industry associations – Other marine users – The community

  • Think of a more granular problem you have
  • faced. How could this have been prevented?

27 A422745

  • Offshore petroleum portal
  • Earlier notice of upcoming submission
  • Communicate examples of good

performance

  • Voluntary publication of EP implementation

strategy on titleholders website

Example Ideas

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Brainstorming

28 A422745

Problems Aims Strategies

A wide range of and some poor consultation practices leading to a loss of trust Deliver effective consultation processes to ensure stakeholder views are taken into account Promote and ensure titleholders provide the right information, to the right persons, at the right time Maintain collaborative relationships with government to ensure meaningful consultation by industry Transparency of decision making not meeting community expectations Build a view of trust in the community of

  • ffshore petroleum

environment management Create a more open offshore petroleum regime Develop better ways to deliver regulatory services to the community

  • What could be done to deliver on these strategies?