st mary s presentation to parents
play

St Marys Presentation to Parents 6 th February 2020 1) Vision and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

St Marys Presentation to Parents 6 th February 2020 1) Vision and values 2) Current Trust Schools who are we? 3) Finance and governance 4) Standards 5) Impact of the Trust so far standards and provision 2 Vision for the Trust


  1. St Mary’s Presentation to Parents 6 th February 2020

  2. 1) Vision and values 2) Current Trust Schools – who are we? 3) Finance and governance 4) Standards 5) Impact of the Trust so far – standards and provision 2

  3. Vision for the Trust Schools • An underlying entitlement that all children should be able to attend a ‘good’ or better school, with school improvement as its principal focus. No one school the same, but all with the dual aims of improving academic outcomes and supporting the development of personal and social qualities. A curriculum in our schools that challenges children and one that emphasises extra-curricular involvement to broaden horizons. Learning that is of the highest quality, stimulating and prepares children for life in modern Britain and builds resilience. Where the Christian vision is important to all our schools Where strong and structured collaboration is the driving force behind all that we do and keeps us all safe and secure . 3

  4. Current Trust Schools: Current Ofsted rating 1-4 School Name Location Sector N.o.R. %PP Date of joining MAT (with date) Norton Hill Secondary School MSN Sec 11-18 1734 15% 2009 2 (1 for behaviour/safety (Jul 17) Somervale Secondary School MSN Sec 11-18 559 28% 2009 2 St Dunstan’s Secondary School Glastonbury Sec 11-16 330 28% 2016 2 Beechen Cliff Secondary School Bath Sec 11-18 1350 10% 2019 4 (SW) Writhlington Secondary School Radstock Sec 11-18 1220 21% 2019 3 Mendip Studio School Radstock 14-19 165 18% 2019 2 Critchill Special School Frome 2-19 64 15% 2019 2 High Littleton (C of E) HL Pri 175 12% 2014 1 Clutton (C of E) Clutton Pri 135 13% 2014 2 Trinity Church School (C of E) Radstock Pri /Nur 200 30% 2015 2 Dundry Primary (C of E) Dundry Pri 90 10% 2015 3 Longvernal Primary MSN Pri/nur 155 29% 2016 2 (1 for l and M) Welton Primary MSN Pri 200 26% 2016 2 Farrington Gurney Primary (C of E) FG Pri 90 5% 2017 2 Midsomer Norton Primary MSN Pri/nur 360 22% 2017 2 Norton Hill Primary Free School (2019) MSN Pri 630 N/A 2015 N/A Hemington Primary Hemington Pri 34 35% 2018 2 Westfield Primary MSN Pri 480 20% 2018 2 St John’s Primary MSN Pri 480 15% 2018 2 Shoscombe Primary (C of E) Shoscombe Pri 90 20% 2018 2 St Julian’s Primary (C of E) Wellow Pri 102 15% 2018 2 Leigh-on-Mendip First School Leigh On Mendip Infant 55 12% 2018 1 Peasedown Primary Peasedown pri 575 20% 2019 4

  5. Governance and Leadership • 5 Members (Diocesan representation) • 11 Trustees – with defined roles and certain schools they specialise in (Diocesan representation) • LGB’s with 9 -12 governors – with defined role • No committees • Chairs group • Head’s group • Senior Central Leadership Team • Joint leadership teams • Joint middle leader teams • DHT group • Subject groups in place to share best practice • A number of MAT roles across subjects Maths, English, etc. • School improvement team that is deployed across schools in the Trust • 3 key external experts that validate information flows between leaders, governors and trustees 7

  6. St Mark’s 2019 8

  7. Performance of schools – secondary schools (Green is significant plus/above average) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Overall Progress all 1007.5 1009 0.55 0.3 0.25 0.33 secondary schs DA 983.3 963 0.31 0.2 0.1 0.1 PA VA LPA 1002.2 LPA 981.8 LPA 1.12/ 0.86 LPA 0.9 LPA 0.9 LPA 0.8 MPA 1011.7 MPA 1012.5 MPA 0.55/0.11 MPA 0.4 MPA 0.6 MPA 0.3 HPA 1003.0 HPA 1010.3 HPA 0.31/-0.47 HPA 0.15 HPA 0.1 HPA 0.2 SEN EHC 1049.3 EHC - - - EHC - - - ENC 0 EHC 0.1 EHC 0.1 SUP 943.1 SUP 954.7 SUP 0.78 SUP 0.35 SUP 0.3 SUP 0.2 Boys/girls 991/1008.9 1004.8/1013.8 0.47/0.66 0.2/0.4 0.1/0.4 0.1 En 1000/100.2 1000.5/997.1 0.14 -0.12 0.2 (NHS +0.3) +0.27 Ma 1000.2/998.6 1001.1/997.7 0.37 /0.25 +0.2 (NHS +0.4) +0.21 0.1 Sc 1001.4/999.5 1002.1/1001.2 0.30/ 0.15 +0.25 +0.28 +0.4 9

  8. Performance of schools – primary schools: (Green on attainment side represents better than national or strong improvement. Green on progress represents significantly above national or significant improvement. Yellow is close to national, red is significantly below, white is ‘in - line’ with national.) School GLD% Y1 Y2 Ks1 R KS 1 W KS1 M KS 2 R KS 2 W KS 2 M KS 2 SP School Nat R, W, M, Current Pr R W M Nat 71% Phonics Phonics 76% 68% 75% Nat 75% Nat 78% Nat 76% Nat 78% KS2 average 64% OFSTED Nat 81% Catch-up (91) RWM HL 76% 87% 50% 78% 73% 82% 95% 52% 91%, 30% 95%, 45% 86 up from 80 64 1 3.7 2.4 5.6 (76%) (81%) (92%, 23) (70% (81% 12) 12) (100%, 50) (80%, 20%) (95%,40%) CL 77% 88% 100% 84%, 32 84% 75% 67%, 38% 67% 19% 71% 24 52% down from 64 2 0 1.5 -0.9 90% 19 (61%) (78%) (46%) 16 26 93% 60% (-2.6) (-1.8) (-2.2) (54%) (62%) (66%,27%) (79%,33%) (40) (71%, 20%) Tr 65% 87% 83% 81% 74% 78% 77% 44% 82% 23% 73%, 27% 73% up from 64% 64 2 0.3 0.8 0.3 (68%) (81%) (33%) (50%) (50%) (50%) (-5.3) (-2.1) (-4.1) (68%,14%) (82%,18) (68%, 25) Du 64% 73% 0% 62% 62% 62% 57%, 29% 71%, 14% 57% 0% 50% down from 64 3** -4.5 -1.3 -4.2 (73%) 73% (67%) (67%) (67%) (67%) 82% (1.1) (-1.5) (-0.8) (82%) (82%) 82% Lo 76% 80% 100% 76% 76% 88 83% 83% 89% 83% up from 64 2 -0.3 0.5 2.4 (72%) (94%) (76%,26) (76%, 26) (79%, 16) 70% (81%) (80%) (81%) We 68% 93% 0% 72% 68% 72% 67% 68% 54% 50% down from 64 2 -1.3 -1.1 -1.3 (74%) (90%) (69%) (54%) (73%) 64% (-1.1) (-2.4) (-1.7) (75%,18%) (75%, 7%) (71%,25%) FG 75% 92% 66% 86% 64% 86% 100% 16% 100% 33% 100% 66% 100% up from 64 2 0.7 2.3 2.9 (77%) (81%) 14% 7% 7% 64% (-0.6) (-0.8) (-0.3) (80%) (80%) (80%) (64%,43) (86%,14%) (79% 21%) MSP 76% 89% 95% 64% 32% 64%, 19% 70% 27% 76%, 22% 78% 85% 66% up from 64 2 1.5 1.9 (1.3) 1.9 (75%) (70%) (100%) (72%) 64% (81%) 50% (0.5) (0.7) (65%) (72%) (74%) St John 78% 84% 84%, 37% 85%, 20% 83% 31% 92% 79% 75% 69% 64 2 L-on-M 73% 100% 83% 75% 83% N/A N/A N/A N/A 64 1 WF 71.6% 75% 73% 69% 75% 84% 81% 90% 74% 64 2 +0.8 +1.5 +1.5 Hem 0 100% 100% 67% 67% 67% 60%* 0%* 40%* 20%* 0% 64 2 St Jul 80% 88% 100% 88% 81% 81% 81% 88% 87% 81% 64 1 Shos 79% 85% 40% 49% 42% 63% 60% 87% 40% 33% 64 2 Peas 74% 86% 74% 72% 61% 71% 68% 78% 57% 49% 64% 2 10

  9. Successes and impact of the Trust: These are wide-ranging and a full overview is available in the attached documents; • Outcomes at secondary are high over 3 year trend for all groups and at GCSE and KS5. St Dunstan’s has improved significantly (now a ‘good’) and SVS remains good since joining the Trust. • Outcomes in primary schools have improved over time. Trinity, Welton, Clutton, Longvernal have all improved significantly. • Provision for children has improved including a better curriculum, improved facilities, improved support for children, e.g those with SEN. • School improvement is shared across the Trust schools, is more efficient and impact driven. • Staff training is done across the Trust and addresses common issues. Teachmeets, moderation, governor, TAs, clerking, finance, etc. • Governance is improved at individual school level which is supporting leaders in schools. • Budgets will be balanced in 90% of the schools this year with £2 million in reserve. • OFSTED speak highly of the work done by the Trust – see recent inspections visits from Norton Hill, Somervale, Clutton , Trinity, St Dunstan’s, Longvernal, Dundry. 11

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend