SSSP STUDENT EQUITY BSI Integration
IMPORT A NT INFO Deadline: December 1 , 2017 01 Integrated plan will cover two years. Budget plan to reflect 2017-18 allocations 02 Integrated fiscal reports required on an annual basis 03 Programmatic & student outcome data collected via existing MIS reporting 04 Align integrated plan with college and district strategic plans/education master plans 05 INTEGR A TION P A RT I
INTEGR A TION P A RT I D A T A- DRIVEN PL A NNING Grounded in data Look at existing data Previous plans Statewide data Data collected from colleges NEW TOOLS , SUPPORT W / D A T A A N A LYSIS Access & completion for basic skills Workforce and CTE Transfer level courses
D A T A A N A LYSIS , GO A L DEVELOPMENT Goals for the general population and for identified student groups, disaggregated by gender Activities designed to address disproportionate impact Analyze data for the following student groups and, if appropriate, develop subgroupspecific goals: current or former foster youth, students with disabilities, low-income students, veterans, American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian students, black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, white, some other race, and more than one race.
D A T A A N A LYSIS , GO A L DEVELOPMENT ( CONT ' D ) Success rates for students with basic skills needs using Basic Skills Cohort Tracker data that show: (1) The number of students successfully transitioning to college-level mathematics and English courses, and (2) The time it takes students to successfully transition to college-level mathematics and English courses.
D A T A TO INFORM PL A NNING: Trends for incoming students related to engagement in (1) orientation (2) assessment (3) education planning # of students on academic or progress probation, referred to follow up interventions or services and successfully moved from probation # of non-credit CDCP certificates awarded Non-credit course success data # of students who transition from non- credit to credit
INTEGR A TION P A RT II PROGR A M GO A LS & PL A NNING PREVIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS ID ONE GOAL FROM 2015-2016 2015-2016 Planning Cycle Intersects SSSP, Student Equity, BSI Describe integration activities Integration goals required for 2017-2019 TIME TO ASSESS Previous program efforts SIGNIFICANT GAINS List progress made A strategy or activity Goals outlined in 2015-2016 SSSP, SE, BSI Student completion or closing achievement gaps OVERALL SUCCESS OR LACK THEREOF? Success attribution
FUTURE PL A NS INTEGR A TED SS GO A LS Completed by June 30, 2019 Outcomes based EX A MPLES Basic skills completion Closing achievement gaps Success rates in degree, certificate, and transfer attainment ID of support for at risk Collab with HS districts, workforce, community partners Select 5 Improved non-credit SS integrated goals
INTEGR A TION OTHER QUESTIONS connect across programs Steps Activities to implement
QUESTIONS MULTI - COLLEGE Integration of matriculation, instruction, and student support to accomplish student DISTRICTS Coordination of efforts for SSSP, Student success goals? Equity, BSI, with other colleges to achieve student success goals Coordination across student-equity related categorical programs. Questions on non-credit Professional development plans OTHERS How to evaluate progress toward meeting Budget Plan student success goals - analyze Executive Summary milestones, momentum points, indicators, Student Equity Goals for required group other metric... Resources Budgeted Student Equity Funding for 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 INTEGR A TION
LIFE IS EITHER A D A RING A DVENTURE OR NOTHING A T A LL . STA CEY GRA H A M WILLIA MS MES A INTEGR A TION PRESENT A TION
2016-17 Expenditure Guidelines Basic Skills, Student Equity, and Student Success and Support Program HIGHLIGHTS: REASONABLE AND JUSTIFIABLE “Reasonable” means expenditures are prudent and every effort is made to utilize funds efficiently. “Justifiable” means expenditures are consistent with goals and activities related to BSI, SE and SSSP. Colleges are strongly urged to develop policies and procedures to document and justify program expenditures. ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY BSI, SSSP and SE will be included in the District Audit Manual with the expectation that district-contracted auditors annually review expenditures. Audits may also be conducted by the California Bureau of State Audits, the Chancellor's Office, or other government agencies with a lawful interest in the expenditure of funds. ***We will have two years to spend 2016-17 allocation.
NON-ALLOWABLE EXPENDITURES 1. Gifts -- funds may not be used for gifts or monetary awards of any kind. Expenditures for a public purpose are not considered a gift of public funds; such expenditures must be coordinated with financial aid departments and be within a student’s cost of attendance. 2. Stipends for Students -- funds may not be used to pay stipends to students for participation in program or classroom activities. 3. Political Contributions -- funds may not be used to pay for political contributions. 4. Courses -- funds may not be used to pay for the delivery of courses that generate full time equivalent students (FTES). 5. Supplanting -- Any funds spent on these programs should supplement, not replace, general or state categorical (restricted) district funds expended on similar program activities prior to the availability of program funding. This restriction applies to categorical programs and any other federal, state, and county programs. **Decisions for each expenditure must be made locally according to program objectives and activities, in addition to the “reasonable and justifiable” criteria outlined above.
Conceptual Model of Integrated Planning Determine milestones during DEVELOP development process to assess how the DATA NEEDED: process is going. Institutional Data Goals, Objectives, External Scans Measurable Objectives, Develop process to address “unknowns” Other Institutional Plans Strategies, Priorities IP Tools: Logic Model Process Improvement Guide Templates IMPLEMENT Sudden opportunities (i.e., DISCOVER new funding streams) and Time for Action challenges or obstacles (i.e., What is planning process Hire, Allocate, Purchase, and structure? Who’s as budget reductions) can Install, etc. involved? What resources happen anytime during the Integration of Other are needed? Departments life of a plan. An integrated planning IP Tools: process provides the Mission Lit Review IP Tools: structure to evaluate these Templates for tracking progress Self-Assessment and “unknowns” and how they relate to the plans and Vision processes already that have been established. Separate processes might need to be developed to address opportunities vs. challenges. EVALUATE REPORT Evaluate progress towards goals. For multi-year plans, Make evaluation results conduct annual public evaluations, and refine strategies if needed. IP Tools: Reporting Tools IP Tools: Dashboards Templates Rubrics v4 for PLN 10-22-16
DISCOVER – This is an important but often overlooked component of an integrated planning process. The discovery phase allows a college to take a step back and evaluate how planning is done. DISCOVER Review the current situation at your college and ask key questions: What is the planning process and structure? • Who’s involved? • What resources are needed? • How are resources allocated? • What are the other committees, groups, etc. and how are they related? • Look at the other components of the IP Model and evaluate their • effectiveness. If gaps are found, how can they be addressed? Integration: IP Resources Examples How are the college’s • Logic Model key plans (i.e., BSI, SSSP, • Process Improvement Guide • SEP, Technology, Budget, Crosswalk • Facilities, etc.) Who What Mapping • integrated? If not, why Templates, forms and how can integration • Planning diagrams be improved? • Videos • Examples from other colleges • Accreditation Remember to properly document this work; it will be important evidence for accreditation. v4 for PLN 10-22-16
DEVELOP – The development of the plan is the main focus of this component of the IP Model. Key questions: What does the institutional data look like? • DEVELOP Is input from stakeholders (internal & external) solicited? • What is happening outside the college that may impact it? Has • an Environmental Scan been conducted? What are the Goals, Measurable Objectives, Strategies, etc.? • Are there institution set standards? • How are goals prioritized? • How can the college plan for the unknown? (see Sudden • Opportunities/ Sudden Challenges or Obstacles) Integration: As you develop the plan, consider how the goals and • measurable objectives will be implemented, evaluated and What are the links • reported. between this plan and other institutional IP Resources Examples plans? Templates, forms • If goals are similar • SWOT Analysis • between the plans, are Scenario planning institution set standards • Process Improvement Guide - Conducting effective meetings consistent among them? • Videos • Examples from other colleges • Accreditation Remember to properly document this work; it will be important evidence for v4 for PLN 10-22-16 accreditation.
Recommend
More recommend
