Sprache und Gefhl: Neuropsychologische Einsichten in die emotionale - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sprache und gef hl neuropsychologische einsichten in die
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sprache und Gefhl: Neuropsychologische Einsichten in die emotionale - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sprache und Gefhl: Neuropsychologische Einsichten in die emotionale Prosodie Axel Mecklinger Arbeitseinheit Experimentelle Neuropsychologie Fachrichtung Psychologie Universitt des Saarlandes Experimental Neuropsychology Unit


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Axel Mecklinger Arbeitseinheit Experimentelle Neuropsychologie Fachrichtung Psychologie Universität des Saarlandes

Sprache und Gefühl: Neuropsychologische Einsichten in die emotionale Prosodie

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Experimental Neuropsychology Unit

  • Neurocognition of Learning
  • Memory and Emotion
  • Binding Mechanisms
  • Memory in Early Childhood
  • Cerebrovascular Dementia
  • EEG / ERP
  • fMRI / Patient studies

http://www.neuro.psychologie.uni-saarland.de

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Experimental Neuropsychology Unit

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Experimental Neuropsychology Unit

Electroencephalographic (EEG) Imaging

slide-5
SLIDE 5

EKP correlates of memory

Frontal old/new effect Parietal old/new effect alt neu

Familiarity Recollection

Mecklinger (2000) Rugg et al (1998) Curran (2000)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Experimental Neuropsychology Unit Binding in Human Memory:

  • Memory for Associations may depend on the

ease of unitisation.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Probing the Ease of Unitisation with emotionally valenced words

  • Emotionally valenced spoken words
  • Easy unitization:

Congruent intonation (intra-item binding)

  • Difficult unitization:

Neutral intonation (inter-item binding)

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Gender Differences in the Processing

  • f Emotional Prosody

“Men don‘t really understand ! There are pronounced gender differences in the time course

  • f processing emotional prosody“

Schirmer et al. (2002, 2003)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Study Study Experimental Design

Task Task: : Remember word and prosody!

+

ITI 200 ms 1500 ms 2000 ms

+

„ „bestanden bestanden “ “

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Test Test

+

Source Source Task Task: : ”congruent“ vs. “neutral” prosody during study 200 ms 300 ms 300 ms 1200 ms 2000 ms 2.Response Window/ITI bestanden bestanden 1. Response Window Old/ Old/new new judgment judgment Source Source judgment judgment

Experimental Design

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Behavioral Data

Item Pr

0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 male female

neutral congruent

Source Performance 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 male female

Correct responses

neutral congruent

Item memory is better for congruent than for neutral words Source memory: Females outperform males !

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Sensitivity of Familiarity to Associations?

Females: 250-400 ms: congruent > neutral (p<.10)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ERPs: Source Memory: Males

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Are males less able to discriminate emotional prosody?

  • Follow up study:

Classification of intonation: Congruent

  • r neutral?
  • 12 male and 12 female participants.

Mecklinger et al. (in prep)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Are males less able to discriminate emotional prosody?

Performance 0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 male female Correct Responses neutral congruent Reaction Times (correct responses) 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 male female Time neutral congruent

RTs faster for neutral than for congruent words but: No gender differences in prosody discrimination !

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Females show better source memory for easy-

(and difficult) to-associate features. They are better capable to unitize features to create a single episodic represenations (at least with emotional prosody).

  • Implications for the design of language

dialogs?

Conclusion(s)