spiking neural models from point processes to partial
play

Spiking neural models: from point processes to partial differential - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spiking neural models: from point processes to partial differential equations. Julien Chevallier Co-workers: M. J. Cceres, M. Doumic and P. Reynaud-Bouret LJAD University of Nice INRIA Sophia-Antipolis 2016/06/09 Introduction Thinning


  1. Spiking neural models: from point processes to partial differential equations. Julien Chevallier Co-workers: M. J. Càceres, M. Doumic and P. Reynaud-Bouret LJAD University of Nice INRIA Sophia-Antipolis 2016/06/09

  2. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Outline 1 Introduction 2 A key tool: The thinning procedure 3 First approach: Mathematical expectation 4 Second approach: Mean-field interactions

  3. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Outline 1 Introduction Neurobiologic context Microscopic modelling Macroscopic modelling 2 A key tool: The thinning procedure 3 First approach: Mathematical expectation 4 Second approach: Mean-field interactions

  4. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Biological context Action potential +40 Voltage (mV) Depolarization R e 0 p o l a r i z a t i o Failed n Threshold -55 initiations Resting state -70 Stimulus Refractory period 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (ms) Neurons = electrically excitable cells. Action potential = spike of the electrical potential. Physiological constraint: refractory period.

  5. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Biological context microscopic scale Action potential +40 Voltage (mV) Depolarization Repolarization 0 Threshold Failed -55 initiations Resting state -70 Stimulus Refractory period 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (ms) Neurons = electrically excitable cells. Action potential = spike of the electrical potential. Physiological constraint: refractory period.

  6. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Biological context microscopic scale Action potential +40 Voltage (mV) Depolarization Repolarization 0 Threshold Failed -55 initiations Resting state -70 Stimulus Refractory period 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (ms) Neurons = electrically excitable cells. Action potential = spike of the electrical potential. Physiological constraint: refractory period.

  7. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Biological context microscopic scale . Action potential +40 Voltage (mV) Depolarization . Repolarization 0 Threshold Failed -55 . initiations Resting state -70 Stimulus Refractory period 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (ms) Neurons = electrically excitable cells. Action potential = spike of the electrical potential. Physiological constraint: refractory period.

  8. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Biological context microscopic scale macroscopic scale . Action potential +40 Voltage (mV) Depolarization . Repolarization 0 Threshold Failed -55 . initiations Resting state -70 Stimulus Refractory period 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (ms) Neurons = electrically excitable cells. Action potential = spike of the electrical potential. Physiological constraint: refractory period.

  9. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Biological context microscopic scale macroscopic scale . Action potential +40 Voltage (mV) Depolarization . Repolarization 0 Threshold Failed -55 . initiations Resting state -70 Stimulus Refractory period 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (ms) Neurons = electrically excitable cells. Action potential = spike of the electrical potential. Physiological constraint: refractory period.

  10. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Biological context microscopic scale macroscopic scale . Action potential +40 Voltage (mV) Depolarization . Repolarization 0 Threshold Failed -55 . initiations Resting state -70 Stimulus Refractory period 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (ms) Neurons = electrically excitable cells. Action potential = spike of the electrical potential. Physiological constraint: refractory period.

  11. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Microscopic modelling Microscopic modelling of spike trains Time point processes = random countable sets of times (points of R or R + ). Point process: N = { T i , i ∈ Z } s.t. ··· < T 0 ≤ 0 < T 1 < ··· . � f ( t ) N ( dt ) = ∑ i ∈ Z f ( T i ) . Point measure: N ( dt ) = ∑ i ∈ Z δ T i ( dt ) . Hence,

  12. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Microscopic modelling Microscopic modelling of spike trains Time point processes = random countable sets of times (points of R or R + ). Point process: N = { T i , i ∈ Z } s.t. ··· < T 0 ≤ 0 < T 1 < ··· . � f ( t ) N ( dt ) = ∑ i ∈ Z f ( T i ) . Point measure: N ( dt ) = ∑ i ∈ Z δ T i ( dt ) . Hence, Age process: ( S t − ) t ≥ 0 . Age = delay since last spike.

  13. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Microscopic modelling Microscopic modelling of spike trains Time point processes = random countable sets of times (points of R or R + ). Point process: N = { T i , i ∈ Z } s.t. ··· < T 0 ≤ 0 < T 1 < ··· . � f ( t ) N ( dt ) = ∑ i ∈ Z f ( T i ) . Point measure: N ( dt ) = ∑ i ∈ Z δ T i ( dt ) . Hence, Age process: ( S t − ) t ≥ 0 . Stochastic intensity Heuristically, � � 1 N ([ t , t +∆ t ]) = 1 | F N λ t = lim ∆ t P , t − ∆ t → 0 where F N t − denotes the history of N before time t . Local behaviour: probability to find a new spike. May depend on the past (e.g. refractory period, aftershocks).

  14. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Some classical point processes in neuroscience Poisson process: λ t = λ ( t ) (deterministic, no refractory period).

  15. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Some classical point processes in neuroscience Poisson process: λ t = λ ( t ) (deterministic, no refractory period). Renewal process: λ t = f ( S t − ) ⇔ i.i.d. ISIs. (refractory period)

  16. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Some classical point processes in neuroscience Poisson process: λ t = λ ( t ) (deterministic, no refractory period). Renewal process: λ t = f ( S t − ) ⇔ i.i.d. ISIs. (refractory period) � t − Linear Hawkes process: λ t = µ + h ( t − z ) N ( dz ) , h ≥ 0 . 0

  17. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Some classical point processes in neuroscience Poisson process: λ t = λ ( t ) (deterministic, no refractory period). Renewal process: λ t = f ( S t − ) ⇔ i.i.d. ISIs. (refractory period) � t − Linear Hawkes process: λ t = µ + h ( t − z ) N ( dz ) , h ≥ 0 . 0

  18. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Some classical point processes in neuroscience Poisson process: λ t = λ ( t ) (deterministic, no refractory period). Renewal process: λ t = f ( S t − ) ⇔ i.i.d. ISIs. (refractory period) � t − Linear Hawkes process: λ t = µ + h ( t − z ) N ( dz ) , h ≥ 0 . 0 � �� � ∑ h ( t − T ) T ∈ N T < t

  19. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Some classical point processes in neuroscience Poisson process: λ t = λ ( t ) (deterministic, no refractory period). Renewal process: λ t = f ( S t − ) ⇔ i.i.d. ISIs. (refractory period) � t − Linear Hawkes process: λ t = µ + h ( t − z ) N ( dz ) , h ≥ 0 . 0 � �� � ∑ h ( t − T ) T ∈ N T < t

  20. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Some classical point processes in neuroscience Poisson process: λ t = λ ( t ) (deterministic, no refractory period). Renewal process: λ t = f ( S t − ) ⇔ i.i.d. ISIs. (refractory period) � t − Linear Hawkes process: λ t = µ + h ( t − z ) N ( dz ) , h ≥ 0 . 0 � �� � ∑ h ( t − T ) T ∈ N T < t

  21. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Age structured equations (K. Pakdaman, B. Perthame, D. Salort, 2010) Age = delay since last spike. � probability density of finding a neuron with age s at time t . n ( t , s ) = ratio of the neural population with age s at time t .  ∂ n ( t , s ) + ∂ n ( t , s )  + p ( s , X ( t )) n ( t , s ) = 0   ∂ t ∂ s (PPS) � + ∞  mean firing rate →  n ( t , 0 ) = p ( s , X ( t )) n ( t , s ) ds .  0

  22. Introduction Thinning procedure 1/ Expectation 2/ Mean-field Summary Age structured equations (K. Pakdaman, B. Perthame, D. Salort, 2010) Age = delay since last spike. � probability density of finding a neuron with age s at time t . n ( t , s ) = ratio of the neural population with age s at time t .  ∂ n ( t , s ) + ∂ n ( t , s )  + p ( s , X ( t )) n ( t , s ) = 0   ∂ t ∂ s (PPS) � + ∞  mean firing rate →  n ( t , 0 ) = p ( s , X ( t )) n ( t , s ) ds .  0 Parameters rate function p . For example, p ( s , X ) = 1 { s > σ ( X ) } . � t X ( t ) = 0 d ( t − x ) n ( x , 0 ) dx (global neural activity) d = delay function. For example, d ( x ) = e − τ x . Propagation time.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend