Spending Estimates for Health Care Episodes Minnesota All Payer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

spending estimates for health care episodes
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Spending Estimates for Health Care Episodes Minnesota All Payer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spending Estimates for Health Care Episodes Minnesota All Payer Claims Database Stefan Gildemeister State Health Economist | Director, Health Economics Program NAHDO Health Care Data Summit November 6, 2019 Overview How Minnesota Uses the MN


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Spending Estimates for Health Care Episodes

Minnesota All Payer Claims Database

Stefan Gildemeister State Health Economist | Director, Health Economics Program NAHDO Health Care Data Summit November 6, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

  • How Minnesota Uses the MN APCD
  • Episodes of Care
  • Progress to Date
  • Preliminary Results

Chronic Episodes

Procedural Episodes

  • Next Steps

Overview

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

Analytic & Data Team

Altarum/Ctr. for Value in Health Care (Prometheus)

  • Elijah Torrico
  • Jim Burnham
  • Matt Beatty
  • Anirudh Deshpande
  • Gregory Matthews

Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), Health Economics Program

  • Karl Fernstrom
  • Erinn Sanstead
  • Ben Nicla
  • Pamela Mink
  • Stefan Gildemeister
  • Information technology and

data security staff

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Project Overview

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Engage providers in a conversation about system efficiency Support community with statewide benchmarks Inform policy-makers about

  • pportunities

for delivery system reform Demonstrate the applied research and policy value of the MN APCD

Goals and Priorities in the Use of the MN APCD

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Work to Date on Health Care Spending

  • Estimating cost drivers
  • Identifying cost of:

➢Patients with chronic diseases ➢Disease attributable spending

  • Reporting on spending on low-value care
  • Analyzing prescription drug spending & trends
  • Documenting concentration of spending
  • Highlighting the failure of hospital markets to discipline prices

6

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

  • Episode-based analyses:

➢ Group together procedures, services, and medications ➢ Outline the entire range of treatment for a single condition

  • By grouping together clinically associated services across

disparate settings, episodes of care better reflect:

➢ The total cost of care for a specific condition ➢ The continuum of providers and services navigated in seeking treatment for a condition ➢ Impact of different treatment choices on spending

Episodes of Care Overview

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

  • Apply Altarum’s PROMETHEUS Analytics Episode of Care

definitions to MN APCD data

➢ Issue brief with key findings ➢ Public Use File (PUF) designed based on stakeholder feedback ➢ Engagement with employers and other stakeholders on the value of the analysis

Objectives

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

PROMETHEUS episodes are…

➢ Patient-centered ➢ Time-delimited (including pre-op and post-acute phases)

PROMETHEUS episodes have been built for…

➢ Acute conditions ➢ Chronic conditions ➢ Inpatient/outpatient procedures

PROMETHEUS episodes…

➢ Include all covered services related to the care of the condition ➢ Differentiate “typical” services from services associated with

Potentially Avoidable Complications (PACs)

PROMETHEUS Analytics

Episode definitions can be made fully transparent to stakeholders

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Progress to Date

slide-11
SLIDE 11

1 1

  • Performed stakeholder engagement on the front end … and later on
  • Build cloud-based IT solutions while maintaining data privacy
  • Mapped MN APCD data for PROMETHEUS input

➢ Validated PROMETHEUS output ➢ Tested the interaction of various elements of pre/post grouping

  • Underway:

➢ Finalize data runs across all payers ➢ Select episodes to publically report

Project Steps & Considerations

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

1 2

  • Stakeholders from hospital and provider association, local

measurement groups, employer coalition, and academia who recommended …

➢ Include all lines of business ➢ Report temporal trends ➢ Identify the cost attributable to specific complications (or the inverse) ➢ Choose episodes for PUF empirically

Key Takeaways from Stakeholder Meeting

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

DRAFT PUF Stratifications

Unique Row ID Number Episode ID Episode Name Episode Type ZCTA Zip 3 Year Payer 12 EP0813 Knee Replacement Procedure 551 2015/2016 Commercial 13 EP0813 Knee Replacement Procedure 551 2015/2016 Medicaid 14 EP0813 Knee Replacement Procedure 551 2016/2017 Commercial 15 EP0813 Knee Replacement Procedure 551 2016/2017 Medicaid 220 EP0813 Knee Replacement Procedure 552 2015/2016 Commercial 221 EP0813 Knee Replacement Procedure 552 2015/2016 Medicaid 222 EP0813 Knee Replacement Procedure 552 2016/2017 Commercial 223 EP0813 Knee Replacement Procedure 552 2016/2017 Medicaid Etc… Episode Count Average Cost 50th percentile cost Inpatient cost proportion Outpatient cost proportion Professional cost proportion RX cost proportion PAC Percent 50th percentile PAC Percent 12,062 $21,010 $18,908 0.69 0.09 0.19 0.03 10.0% 8.0% 6,010 $14,500 $12,220 0.57 0.14 0.24 0.05 11.0% 6.5% 12,987 $21,959 $20,010 0.69 0.09 0.19 0.03 10.0% 8.0% 6,109 $14,987 $13,987 0.69 0.09 0.19 0.03 11.0% 6.5% 9,003 $22,898 $20,387 0.69 0.09 0.19 0.03 10.0% 8.0% 8,109 $15,118 $14,980 0.69 0.09 0.19 0.03 11.0% 6.5% Etc…

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Preliminary Results

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

50,000 Beneficiaries $331 Million Total Allowed Amount

1 5

Preliminary Episode Spending Analysis

Sample of Commercially Insured Population, 2015-2017 Input Data PROMETHEUS Episodes 61% of total allowed amount assigned to episodes ($198 million)

Preliminary results were derived from a convenience sample of Minnesota's commercially enrolled individuals. Data shared today are illustrative and not intended for inference. MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

1 6

Procedural Episodes with Highest Spending

  • Annualized and unsplit

costs

➢ Reflect total cost of care ➢ Can apply to concurrent

episodes

  • Variation in proportion of

costs attributable to PACs

➢ 0.6% (Colonoscopy) ➢ 7.6% (Coronary

angioplasty)

$2,889 $32,952 $45,971 $107,193 $3,470 $17 $847 $3,485 $7,771 $134 $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 Colonoscopy Knee Replacement & Revision Coronary Angioplasty CABG &/or Value Replacement Upper GI Endoscopy Average Annualized Cost PAC Attributable Portion

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

1 7

Chronic Episodes with Highest Spending

  • Annualized and unsplit

costs

➢ Reflect total cost of care ➢ Can apply to concurrent

episodes

  • Variation in proportion of

costs attributable to PACs

➢ 4.3% (Diabetes) ➢ 10.6% (Hypertension)

$598 $1,581 $550 $256 $645 $36 $67 $40 $27 $18 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800 Depression & Anxiety Diabetes Low Back Pain Hypertension Asthma Average Annualized Cost PAC Attributable Portion

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

1 8

In Summary

Continue Shedding Light on Health Spending

Chronic conditions Procedural episodes

Identify Opportunities for Further System Efficiencies

Cost associated with avoidable complications Effect of variation in services use on cost & outcomes

Build Out PUF Portfolio

First Generation + new designs underway PUFs with applied value

But: Episode Grouping Is Complex

Computationally and analytically challenging Challenging to apply concept to multi-payer data A lot needs to go right

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Thank you!

19

Health Economics Program: www.health.state.mn.us/healtheconomics Health Care Market Statistics: www.health.state.mn.us/data/economics/chartbook/ Minnesota All Payer Claims Data: www.health.state.mn.us/data/apcd/ Contact: Stefan.Gildemeister@state.mn.us/ 651.201.3550

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2 0

PUF Requesters

  • Approximately 200

individuals have requested the first generation of PUFs since 2016

  • Average of about 6

requests per month

  • Most individuals request

all 3 PUFs

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Agency/regulator Consumer/patient Employer Health care payer Health care provider Media Other Researcher PUF Requests

MDH/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM – MINNESOTA ALL PAYER CLAIMS DATABASE (MN APCD)