Sovereigntist Perspective (inside the EU) compendious legal external - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sovereigntist perspective inside the eu
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sovereigntist Perspective (inside the EU) compendious legal external - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Europe and the Globe - Two Perspectives Sovereigntist Perspective Globally resilient framework still influential upon the EU Governance Perspective Alternative perspective the EU a key source Sovereigntist Perspective (inside the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Europe and the Globe - Two Perspectives

  • Sovereigntist Perspective

Globally resilient framework – still influential upon the EU

  • Governance Perspective

Alternative perspective – the EU a key source

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Sovereigntist Perspective (inside the EU)

  • ‘compendious legal external sovereignty towards rest of

the world’ (MacCormick) . The same quantum of sovereignty

  • BUT new internal distribution of that sovereignty
  • AND new allocation of external sovereign title on the basis
  • f new internal distribution
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Four approaches to sovereignty within the EU

  • Aggregative (still state-centred)
  • Consolidated (and elevated to the supranational level)
  • Compound (split between state and supranational levels)
  • Redundant (‘splitting of atom’ means sovereign no longer)

Contest maps onto different insider views of EU (internal and external) competence over ‘high’ and ‘low’ politics

slide-4
SLIDE 4

EU sovereignty viewed from the outside

  • Tendency to view the EU as a ‘compound’ entity in

sovereign terms BUT

  • Objective difficulties - must confront substantive and

institutional complexity and associated uncertainty and controversy (e.g. mixed agreements, variable ‘membership’ of international organisations)

  • Attitudinal unease – the EU viewed as having the influence
  • f a single large player without the cross-sectoral cohesion
  • r clear lines of accountability
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Re-imagining the World – the Governance approach

  • ‘Environmental’ or ‘milieu’ goals over

‘possession’ goals

  • Collective over unilateral action
  • Stably institutionalized systems of regulation
  • ver discrete interventions
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Consequences of absence of ‘normal’ sovereignty conditions

  • Fewer ‘hard’ material possessions to defend
  • No existential threat to basic unit of political community
  • Pedigree of collective negotiation
  • Lack of security infrastructure to back unilateral action
  • Less concerned about fettering its discretion through long-

term institutional commitment

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Modalities of Governance Approach

  • Content – pursuit of shared transnational and global public

goods

  • Method – multilateral and long-term. Expresses core

political values (e.g. democracy and rule of law) as well as preferred processes

  • Form - self-cloning - ‘enmeshment’ as paradigmatic
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Clash of two Imaginaries – Some Questions

  • Is the EU global catalyst for new ‘governance’ approach,
  • r just surfing the trend?
  • To the extent that it is the prime mover, tension between

unilateral assumption and multilateral vision. (Europe as Empire, Europe as Cosmopolis?)

  • How have the governance and sovereigntist views been

reconciled?

  • How are they likely to be reconciled and disseminated in

the future, given pressure to emphasize both approaches?