some models at the interface of probability theory and
play

Some models at the interface of probability theory and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Some models at the interface of probability theory and combinatorics: particle systems and maps. Luis Fredes PhD defense. Under the supervision of J.F. Marckert. Invariant measures of discrete interacting particles systems: algebraic aspects.


  1. Some models at the interface of probability theory and combinatorics: particle systems and maps. Luis Fredes PhD defense. Under the supervision of J.F. Marckert. Invariant measures of discrete interacting particles systems: algebraic aspects. 1 Survival and coexistence for spatial population models with forest fire epidemics. 2 Tree-decorated planar maps: combinatorial results. 3 Tree-decorated planar maps: local limits. 4 Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 1 / 39

  2. Invariant measures of discrete interacting particles systems: algebraic aspects. with J.F. Marckert. Example: TASEP η t + dt η t Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 2 / 39

  3. Invariant measures of discrete interacting particles systems: algebraic aspects. with J.F. Marckert. Example: TASEP η t + dt Exp ( 1 ) η t Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 2 / 39

  4. Particle systems of our interests η t + dt L | Exp ( T [ ]) η t Our setting: model depends on 4 parameters: Graph G = ( V , E ) belonging to Z d , Z / n Z . Set of κ ∈ N ∪ {∞} colors E κ = { 0 , 1 , . . . , κ − 1 } . Dependence neighborhood L ≥ 2. Jump rate matrix T = [ T [ u | w ] ] { u , w ∈ E L κ } . Notation: η t ( v ) → color of vertex v at time t . Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 3 / 39

  5. Particle systems of our interests η t + dt ∼ µ t + dt L | Exp ( T [ ]) η t ∼ µ t Our setting: model depends on 4 parameters: Graph G = ( V , E ) belonging to Z d , Z / n Z . Set of κ ∈ N ∪ {∞} colors E κ = { 0 , 1 , . . . , κ − 1 } . Dependence neighborhood L ≥ 2. Jump rate matrix T = [ T [ u | w ] ] { u , w ∈ E L κ } . Notation: η t ( v ) → color of vertex v at time t . Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 3 / 39

  6. Invariant measure Definition Given T, a distribution µ is said to be invariant if η t ∼ µ for any t ≥ 0, when η 0 ∼ µ . η t + dt ∼ µ L Exp ( T [ | ]) η t ∼ µ Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 4 / 39

  7. Some references: Well definition of PS given T: κ < ∞ , always well defined. [Liggett ’85] . 1 κ = ∞ , not always. Some techniques: 2 Graphic method [Harris 72’] . Functional analysis [Liggett ’73] . Stochastic domination [Andjel ’82] . Existence of invariant measures for specific PS . [Andjel ’82] . Computation of invariant measures for specific PS. [Derrida et al ’93, Blythe & Evans ’07...] . Uniqueness / ergodicity? Convergence to the invariant measure for specific PS? Rate of convergence? [Benjamini et al ’05, Labbé & Lacoin ’16...] . Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 5 / 39

  8. Our main question: Given a (class of) measure, is it possible to characterize the T ’s for which this measure is invariant? Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 6 / 39

  9. A classical sufficient condition for invariance of product measures Detailed balance equations The product measure ρ Z is invariant by T on Z if ρ a ρ b T [ a , b | u , v ] = ρ u ρ v T [ u , v | a , b ] ∀ a , b , u , v ∈ E κ ρ u ρ v u v T [ a , b | u , v ] T [ u , v | a , b ] a b ρ a ρ b The product measure case is partially known. [Fajfrová et al ’16] . Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 7 / 39

  10. Our main question: Is it possible to characterize the T for which the distribution of a Markov chain is invariant ?" Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 8 / 39

  11. Markov Distribution P ( X � 0 , 2 � = x ) = A process X has a Markov distribution M x 0 , x 1 M x 1 , x 2 ρ x 0 ( ρ, M ) , with Markov Kernel (MK) M of memory m = 1 and initial distribution ρ , if for any x ∈ E n + 1 x 0 x 1 x 2 κ n − 1 � P ( X � 0 , n � = x ) = ρ x 0 M x j , x j + 1 . j = 0 Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 9 / 39

  12. Markov Distribution P ( X � 0 , 2 � = x ) = A process X has a Markov distribution M x 0 , x 1 M x 1 , x 2 ρ x 0 ( ρ, M ) , with Markov Kernel (MK) M of memory m = 1 and initial distribution ρ , if for any x ∈ E n + 1 x 0 x 1 x 2 κ n − 1 � P ( X � 0 , n � = x ) = ρ x 0 M x j , x j + 1 . j = 0 P ( X � 0 , 2 � = x ) ∝ Gibbs Distribution · M x 2 , x 0 A vector ( X k , k ∈ Z / n Z ) is said to have X 0 a Gibbs distribution G ( M ) characterized · M x 0 , x 1 X 2 by a MK M , if for any x ∈ E n κ , X 1 � n − 1 j = 0 M x j , x j + 1 · M x 1 , x 2 mod n P ( X � 0 , n − 1 � = x ) = . Trace( M n ) Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 9 / 39

  13. Invariance schemes Y 8 Y 7 Y 9 Y 6 Y 0 Y 5 Y 0 Y 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y 6 Y 1 Y 4 Y 2 Y 3 Y := η t ∼ G ( M ) t > 0 Y := η t ∼ ( ρ, M ) t > 0 Evolution under T Evolution under T X 8 X 7 X 9 X 6 X 0 X 5 X 0 X 1 X 2 X 3 X 4 X 5 X 6 X 1 X 4 X 2 X 3 X := η 0 ∼ ( ρ, M ) X := η 0 ∼ G ( M ) t = 0 t = 0 Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 10 / 39

  14. Invariance schemes Y 8 Y 7 Y 9 Y 6 Y 0 Y 5 Y 0 Y 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y 6 Y 1 Y 4 Y 2 Y 3 Y := η t ∼ G ( M ) t > 0 Y := η t ∼ ( ρ, M ) t > 0 Evolution under T Evolution under T X 8 X 7 X 9 X 6 X 0 X 5 X 0 X 1 X 2 X 3 X 4 X 5 X 6 X 1 X 4 X 2 X 3 X := η 0 ∼ ( ρ, M ) X := η 0 ∼ G ( M ) t = 0 t = 0 Main Theorem (F. & Marckert ’17) Let κ be finite, L = 2 and m = 1. If M > 0 (strictly positive entries) then the following statements are equivalent: 1 ( ρ, M ) is invariant by T on Z . 2 G ( M ) is invariant by T on Z / 7 Z . 3 G ( M ) is invariant by T on Z / n Z , for all n ≥ 3. Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 10 / 39

  15. Elements of the proof: algebraization Suppose µ t = ( ρ, M ) . We define ( x ) := ∂ Line M , T ∂ t µ t ( x 1 x 2 . . . x n − 1 x n ) n Mass creation rate of x = − Mass destruction rate of x Definition A ( ρ, M ) MD under its invariant distribution is said to be invariant by T on the line when Line M , T ≡ 0, for all n ∈ N . n Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 11 / 39

  16. Elements of the proof: algebraization Suppose µ t = ( ρ, M ) . We define ( x ) := ∂ Line M , T ∂ t µ t ( x 1 x 2 . . . x n − 1 x n ) n  n � � � � � �  =  T [ u , v | x j , x j + 1 ] ρ x − 1 M x k , x k + 1 M x j − 1 , u M u , v M v , x j + 2 x − 1 , x 0 , ( u , v ) ∈ E 2 j = 0 − 1 ≤ k ≤ n + 1 κ k �∈{ j − 1 , j , j + 1 } xn + 1 , xn + 2 ∈ E κ  n + 1 � � �  − T [ x j , x j + 1 | u , v ] ρ x − 1 M x k , x k + 1  k = − 1 Definition A ( ρ, M ) MD under its invariant distribution is said to be invariant by T on the line when Line M , T ≡ 0, for all n ∈ N . n Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 12 / 39

  17. Elements of the proof: algebraization Suppose µ t = ( ρ, M ) . We define ( x ) := ∂ Line M , T ∂ t µ t ( x 1 x 2 . . . x n − 1 x n ) n � � n n + 1 � � � = ρ x − 1 M x k , x k + 1 × x − 1 , x 0 , j = 0 k = − 1 xn + 1 , xn + 2 ∈ E κ     M x j − 1 , u M u , v M v , x j + 2 �  − T out T [ u , v | x j , x j + 1 ]    [ x j , x j + 1 ] M x j − 1 , x j M x j , x j + 1 M x j + 1 , x j + 2 ( u , v ) ∈ E 2 κ � �� � Z xj − 1 , xj , xj + 1 , xj + 2 Definition A ( ρ, M ) MD under its invariant distribution is said to be invariant by T on the line when Line M , T ≡ 0, for all n ∈ N . n Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 12 / 39

  18. Elements of the proof: algebraization Suppose µ t = ( ρ, M ) . We define for M > 0 Line M , T ( x ) NLine M , T n ( x ) := n � n − 1 i = 1 M x i , x i + 1 n � � � � = ρ x − 1 M x − 1 , x 0 M x 0 , x 1 × Z x j − 1 , x j , x j + 1 , x j + 2 × M x n , x n + 1 M x n + 1 , x n + 2 x − 1 , x 0 , j = 0 xn + 1 , xn + 2 ∈ E κ Definition A ( ρ, M ) MD under its invariant distribution is said to be invariant by T on the line when Line M , T ≡ 0, for all n ∈ N . n Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 12 / 39

  19. Elements of the proof: algebraization Important message : Line: If M > 0, then ( ρ, M ) is invariant by T on Z ⇐ ⇒ n − 2 � NLine M , T ( x ) = Z L Z x j − 1 , x j , x j + 1 , x j + 2 + Z R for all n ∈ N x 1 , x 2 , x 3 + x n − 2 , x n − 1 , x n = 0 n j = 2 Cycle of length n : If M > 0, then G ( M ) is invariant by T on Z / 7 Z ⇐ ⇒ n − 1 � NCycle M , T ( x ) = Z x j − 1 , x j , x j + 1 , x j + 2 = 0 n j = 0 where i := i mod n Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 13 / 39

  20. Sketch of proof 1) = ⇒ 2) in main theorem: M > 0 1) ( ρ, M ) is invariant by T on Z = ⇒ 2) G ( M ) is invariant by T on Z / 7 Z � NLine M , T ⇒ NCycle M , T ≡ 0 ∀ n ∈ N = ≡ 0 n 7 Consider x ∈ E 7 κ and w = x . . . x � �� � ℓ times NLine M , T ( w ) = Bound. terms + ... = 0 7 ℓ � �� � O ( 1 ) x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 Luis Fredes (Université de Bordeaux) Particle systems and maps 19/09/2019 14 / 39

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend