SOCI 210: Sociological Perspectives Sept. 15 1. Administrative 2. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

soci 210 sociological perspectives
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SOCI 210: Sociological Perspectives Sept. 15 1. Administrative 2. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SOCI 210: Sociological Perspectives Sept. 15 1. Administrative 2. Methods of inquiry 3. Three theoretical lenses 1 Administrative Groups If you have a group or partial group organized , you may pick a group on MyCourses to join


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SOCI 210: Sociological Perspectives

1

  • Sept. 15
  • 1. Administrative
  • 2. Methods of inquiry
  • 3. Three theoretical lenses
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Administrative

2

⦙ If you have a group or partial group

  • rganized, you may pick a group on

MyCourses to join ⦙ Otherwise, I will randomly assign students to groups on Thursday morning

Groups

⦙ Starting Thursday (Sept 17), all lectures will be pre-recorded ⦙ Class period will be used strictly to facilitate group work (Zoom breakout rooms) ⦙ If you will be using class for group work, you must log in to Zoom with your McGill email

Classes

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Methods of Inquiry

Citation Data

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Methods of inquiry

4

Surveys Experiments Field research Secondary analysis

Most sociological research incorporates at least one of:

Images from https://thenounproject.com users
 Rockicon, Adnen Kadri, Blake Thompson, and Symbolon

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methods of inquiry

5

A survey is a list of questions

  • Targeted


Specific population, usually with some form of sampling

  • Uniform


Typically same survey is sent to every participant

Format

  • Various forms of dissemination


Mail; telephone; in-person; online; …

  • Various forms of questions


Yes/no; scale; multiple choice; free response; interview; …

Surveys

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Advantages

  • Can have large

samples

  • Generalizable
  • Structured for charts

and statistical analysis

Challenges

  • Often time consuming

and expensive

  • Non-response
  • Format can yield

unreliable artifacts (results that reflect the survey structure rather than respondents’ beliefs)

Methods of inquiry

6

Surveys

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Experiments

Methods of inquiry

7

Experiments for causal analysis

  • Isolate one potential factor that might be causing

an outcome

  • As much as possible, let nothing else vary
  • Assume that the remaining factors vary

unpredictably

Common laboratory setup

  • Treatment and control group
  • Double-blind


Researchers do not know group assignment

  • Compare outcomes
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Experiments

Methods of inquiry

8

Non-laboratory experiments

  • Vary potential causal factor “in the wild”


Intervetion or “natural experiment”

  • Less reliable than controlled experiment


Outside factors can confound results

Ethical concerns of experiments

  • Consequences of treatment
  • Consequences of withholding treatment
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Experiments

Methods of inquiry

9

Advantages

  • Causal inference
  • Clear analysis
  • Again:


causal inference

Challenges

  • Narrow scope
  • Artificial context
  • Ethical concerns
  • “Hawthorne effect”
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Field research

Methods of inquiry

10

Interact with research subjects directly

  • Unstructured or minimally structured
  • Observe behavior
  • Participate in activities

Aims

  • Gather in-depth information about community,

institution, or place

  • Understand how the people that participate in the

case make sense of their own experience

  • Employ flexible theories and hypotheses, subject to

change as researchers learn more about the people involved

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Field research

Methods of inquiry

11

Ethnography

  • Systematic observation of an entire community
  • “Thick description” (Geertz)
  • Often extend over months, years, or even decades

Participant observation

  • Participate in the community under study
  • Take on roles and responsibilities, form relationships
  • Sometimes “under cover”

Case study

  • Single organization, event, or person
  • May use ethnography and secondary data
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Field research

Methods of inquiry

12

Advantages

  • Detailed, accurate,

real-life information

  • Brings individual

accounts to foreground

  • Prioritizes adaptive

research frames

Challenges

  • Very time consuming
  • Often not generalizable
  • Especially sensitive to

researcher expectation

  • Messy data (?)
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Secondary data analysis

Methods of inquiry

13

Use data that already exists

  • “Found data”
  • Not designed to answer the researcher’s question

Characteristics

  • Often (but not always!) easy to obtain
  • Rarely well structured for the research question—
  • ften requires extensive coding/processing
  • Ubiquitous
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Secondary data analysis

Methods of inquiry

14

Repurposed research data

  • Re-use data from another research project to

answer a new question

  • Meta-analysis of existing published research
  • General-purpose data (e.g. Statistics Canada)

Data “in the wild”

  • Anything recorded without scholarly intent

Literature Meeting minutes Recorded conversations / correspondence Social media posts and interactions

  • Very unstructured—variety of methods used to

transform into usable data (e.g. content analysis, coding)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Secondary data analysis

Methods of inquiry

15

Advantages

  • Often inexpensive and

fast to obtain

  • No threat of researcher

taint

  • Often the only option

for historical cases

Challenges

  • Data not focussed on

current research question

  • Must take into account

the social processes that created data

  • Context may be

unavailable

  • Processing may

introduce hidden biases

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Methods of inquiry

16

Field research Surveys Experiments Secondary analysis

Research rarely falls cleanly into

  • ne methodological bin
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Methods of inquiry (summary)

17

Questionnaire Random sample Quantitative Controlled intervention Causal analysis Narrow scope Within community Participant perspective Deep description Found data Repurposed Extensively processed

Surveys Experiments Field research Secondary
 analysis

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Overview of Sociological Theory

Citation Data

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Sociological theory

19

What do we mean by “theory”?

  • Unifying framework
  • Allows different topics to be seen as examples
  • f a larger pattern
  • Gives us tools to think about new situations and

events

  • Can offer a new perspective on topics we

already understand

Generalization

  • Lend weight to a specific case by framing it as

an illustration of a broader social reality

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Sociological theory

20

Scope

  • General theory aims to explain society as a

whole

  • Narrow theory limits itself to explaining a tightly

bounded domain of social reality

Theory of organizational influence Theory of occupational mobility

  • Narrow theories often utilize framework of

general theory

Micro- vs macro-level

  • Micro-level theories start from the behavior and

interactions of individuals, explaining larger structures in terms of these small-scale subjects

  • Macro-level theories start from a view of society

as a whole, explaining individual experiences through the broad, society-wide forces

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Sociological theory

21

Social theory Today’s lecture

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Structural Functionalism

Citation Data

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Structural functionalism

23

Society

Industry Government Religion Labor Education Media

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Structural functionalism

24

Society

Brain Skeleton Liver Blood Stomach Skin Intestine

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Structural functionalism

25

Social cohesion

⦙ Mutually dependent components of society foster a sense of unity that holds society together ⦙ Émile Durkheim theorized a historical shift from mechanical (pre-modern) to

  • rganic (modern) forms of solidarity

Social roles

⦙ The roles that people occupy (mother, banker, leader) are built socially ⦙ Talcott Parsons theorized that roles are necessary for society to function, and become institutionalized over time

Function and dysfunction

⦙ If an institution exists, it exists to fulfill a purpose for society ⦙ Robert Merton: manifest vs implicit function

Some major themes from structural functionalism:

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Conflict
 Theory

Citation Data

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Conflict theory

27

Society

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Conflict theory

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Conflict theory

29

Society

Capital Capital Capital Capital Capital Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Conflict theory

30

Alienation (Karl Marx)

⦙ Humans relate to the products of their work in a very real way ⦙ Capitalism disconnects workers from the goods they produce ⦙ This necessarily yields feelings of alienation, dehumanizing workers

Ideology (Karl Marx)

⦙ The ideology of the oppressors is adopted by oppressed ⦙ Ownership of means of production yields material and ideological power ⦙ Unified ideology of a culture is not due to a sense of collective belonging (as in Durkheim) but the imposition of that ideology by those in power

Some major themes from conflict theory:

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Conflict theory

31

Some major themes from conflict theory:

Authority (Max Weber)

⦙ Domination does not always come from a direct use of force ⦙ Government authority based on monopoly on “legitimate” means of force ⦙ Authority is given as much as taken


Rational-legal, traditional, and charismatic authority

Multi-faceted (Weber, Du Bois, …)

⦙ Conflict is not just about capital versus labor ⦙ Many dimensions of society are defined by conflict within and between them


Class, status, party stratification (Weber)
 Race, “Double consciousness” (Du Bois)

⦙ Many contemporary theoretical approaches can be thought of in the tradition of conflict theory (or critical theory)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Symbolic Interactionism

Citation Data

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Symbolic interactionism

33

Society

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Symbolic interactionism

34

Focus on symbolic meaning

⦙ Explains institutions, behavior, social structure through the meanings people ascribe to

  • bjects in the social world

Micro-level explanation of society

Focus on interaction

⦙ Interactions (rather than classes, roles, or institutions) are basic building block ⦙ Examines behavior—social psychology

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Symbolic interactionism

35

Interaction as basis of self


(George Herbert Mead, Charles Cooley)

⦙ Social world based on mental images

  • f one an other and our interactions

⦙ Interaction involves imagining viewpoint of other person
 “Looking-glass self” ⦙ Concept of self is same process, internalized

Multiple selves


(George Herbert Mead, Erving Goffman)

⦙ Self is built through interactions with

  • thers

⦙ Therefore different conceptions of who we are depending on the social situation we are in

Some major themes from symbolic interactionism:

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Symbolic interactionism

36

Some major themes from symbolic interactionism:

Negotiation of social order


(Herbert Blumer, Erving Goffman)

⦙ Institutions, norms, hierarchies, structures are negotiated through interactions ⦙ Roles are created and recreated in situational contexts


Mutual work of defining the situation

⦙ Regularity of social roles from repeated interaction and expectations

Small-scale structure


(Georg Simmel)

⦙ Small-scale structures of groups (as small as three) have large-scale consequences ⦙ Interactions are not in a vacuum ⦙ (More on this when we talk about relational sociology and network theory later in the term)