Slate Meadow Liaison Group 23 rd February 2015 Charles Power Lead - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Slate Meadow Liaison Group 23 rd February 2015 Charles Power Lead - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Slate Meadow Liaison Group 23 rd February 2015 Charles Power Lead Officer Slate Meadow Development Planning History and Planning Context Overview Slate Meadow Planning History Key Constraints/Issues Recent Events What Next?
Planning History and Planning Context
Overview Slate Meadow
- Planning History
- Key Constraints/Issues
Recent Events What Next? Policy Framework
Overview
- 1954 – Original Green Belt
designation in Bucks
- Added to Green Belt in 1972
removed from GB and reserved for future development since 1989.
- Three Local Plan inspectors have
rejected requests to keep/return it to Green Belt
- Current Plan reserves the land for
development; and
- The site has now been released
for development.
What’s in a name?
- Name of designation has evolved:
- ‘White land’ (pre-1989)
- Areas of Special Restraint (1989-2004)
- Areas of Safeguarded Land (2004-08)
- Reserve Locations for Future Development (2008-
to date)
- (designation changed by inspector as sites needed
WITHIN the plan period given SE Plan req’ts)
Slate Meadow
Size: 10.2 ha Ownership: WDC, Croudace Homes, Avanti Homes Pauline Howe-Davies
Inspectors’ Reports (IR)
- Designation of Reserve Sites has been tested
and accepted by a series of inspectors’ reports
- 1988 – High Wycombe ALP
- July 1994 – Wycombe District LP
- December 2002 – IR on the Public Local Inquiry
into the Wycombe District Local Plan to 2011
- May 2008 –Wycombe District Core Strategy
Planning History
– Began as ‘White Land’ area with no defied policies 1954 – Put in the Green Belt in 1972 as part of its extension – Taken out of Green Belt and allocated as ASR in 1989 at the same time as all other reserve sites. – 1990 application for residential development (174 houses) refused – 2002 Inspectors Report recommended allocating site for housing
- Not the best of the reserve sites
- Least scenic reserve site
- Loss of grade 2 ag land and community identity did not override the need to
retain the site for development
– Core Strategy (2008) confirmed status as a Reserve Location – approved by inspector’s report (2008) Policy CS8 – Allocated for between 150 and 190 homes in the current Local Plan options document
Local Plan Consultation 2014
- Consultation Feb-April
2014
- Potential growth rates
much higher than existing targets
- Included draft sites
policies and development requirements for all the Reserve Sites
Cabinet decision
- Planned release of Reserve Sites
- Preparation of development briefs to shape
planning applications –
– So local people can be involved in process – Best opportunity to secure quality and appropriate infrastructure – Liaison Groups, Infrastr Grp + community eng’t
What Next? Time Line for Applications
- Applications are expected late this year.
- Applications could in theory be submitted at
any time.
- In the event that the Council had taken the
decision not to release the site, applications would in all probability have come anyway.
Key Issues
- Transport infrastructure
- River corridor
- Flood Plain
- Village Green
- Separation between Bourne End and Wooburn
- Disused railway
- Tree preservation orders
Policy Framework
National Planning Policy Framework
Wycombe District Local Plan to 2011 (as saved and extended)
- Various relevant policies – General
Core Strategy
- Policy CS8:
– Reserve locations for future development
Delivery and Site Allocations Plan
- Various relevant policies including