SIPping from the Open Source Well Matthew Bynum UC Architect A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sipping from the open source well
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SIPping from the Open Source Well Matthew Bynum UC Architect A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SIPping from the Open Source Well Matthew Bynum UC Architect A little about me Matthew Bynum Dabbler in Unified Communications for 12 years CCIE Voice #21753 Installed my first Linux distro at age 17 (RedHat 5.0) Open Source


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SIPping from the Open Source Well

Matthew Bynum

UC Architect

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A little about me

  • Dabbler in Unified

Communications for 12 years

  • CCIE Voice #21753
  • Installed my first Linux distro at

age 17 (RedHat 5.0)

  • Open Source lover, amateur

maker, forestry nerd Matthew Bynum

http://gplus.to/mbynum http://www.linkedin.com/in/mattbynum/

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Agenda

  • SIP History
  • Why SIP matters (SIP and DNS)
  • Inside the SIP spec
  • Open Source (and one proprietary) SIP options
  • What the future entails
slide-4
SLIDE 4

SIP is a protocol for establishing sessions in an IP network.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

SIP History

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.

  • Napoleon Bonaparte
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Setting the Stage

The Internet Engineering Task Force first met in 1986. “The mission of the IETF is to make the Internet work better by producing high quality, relevant technical documents that influence the way people design, use, and manage the Internet. “

  • http://www.ietf.org/about/mission.html

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5000

dhcp

TCP UDP TELNET IGMP ICMP FTP ECHO POP3 OSPF RIP

slide-7
SLIDE 7

IETF Meetings The First IETF Audiocast

  • ccurred in 1992. A

method was needed to disseminate the meeting invites.

Create

1

Descr.: DNS Discussion San Fran Orig.: John Doe j.doe@com.com Info: http://www.com.com Start: 04.04.2001 / 09.30 End: 04.20.2001 / 16:30 Media: Audio GSM 224.1.6.7/49000 Media: Video H.263 224.1.6.8/49100

Disseminate

2

SAP/NNTP/HTTP

Invite

SMTP/SIP

Join

3

PC/Telephone

Media

4

PC/Telephone

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Simple Conference Invitation Protocol

Session Invitation Protocol

CALL CHANGE CLOSE by Henning Schulzrinne by Mark Handley and Eve Schooler 1xx 2xx 3xx 4xx 5xx UDP/SDP TCP/SCIP SUCCESS UNSUCCESSFUL BUSY DECLINE UNKNOWN FAILED FORBIDDEN RINGING RINGING TRYING REDIRECT ALTERNATIVE NEGOTIATE

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Simple Conference Invitation Protocol

Session Invitation Protocol

SCIP/1.0 302 Callee has moved temporarily Location: jones@salt.lab3.company.com Location: jones@pepper.lab3.company.com CALL hgs@lupus.fokus.gmd.de 1.0 User-Agent: coco/1.3 From: Christian Zahl <cz@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: Henning Schulzrinne <schulzrinne@fokus.gmd.de> Call-Id: 9510021900.AA07734@lion.cs.tu- berlin.de Referer: ceres.fokus.gmd.de Expires: Mon, 02 Oct 1995 18:44:11 GMT Required: fc99cb08 audio/pcmu; port=3456; transport=RTP; rate=16000; channels=1; pt=97; net=224.2.0.1; ttl=128, audio/gsm; port=3456; transport=RTP; rate=8000; channels=1, audio/lpc; port=3456; transport=RTP; rate=8000; channels=1

SIP/1.0 REQ PA=128.16.65.19 16 AU=none ID=128.16.65.19/32492374 FR=M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk TO=J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk v=0

  • =van 2353644765 2353687637 IN IP4

128.3.4.5 s=Mbone Audio i=Discussion of Mbone Engineering Issues e=van@ee.lbl.gov (Van Jacobsen c=IN IP4 224.2.0.1/127 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP PCMU

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Papa SIP

“Personal Mobility for Multimedia Services in the Internet” by Henning Schulzrinne, March 1996

http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/papers/Schu9603_Personal.pdf

http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/ Creator of RTP

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Internet Architect

http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/M.Handley/ SIP (RFC 2543, RFC 3261); SDP (RFC 2327; SAP, RFC 2974); Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM, RFC 2362), TCP-Friendly Rate Control (TFRC, RFC 3448), Multicast-Scope Zone Announcement Protocol (MZAP, RFC 2776), Multicast Address Allocation (RFC 2908, RFC 2909), TCP Congestion Window Validation ( RFC 2861), Reliable Multicast ( RFC 3451, RFC 3452, RFC 3453, RFC 3048), Datagram Congestion Control Protocol ( RFC 4340, RFC 4336).

Mark Handley

Founder of XORP (www.xorp.org) Creator of SDP

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SIP Drafts

http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/history.html

Date Draft Name December 2, 1996 draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-01 March 27, 1997 draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-02 July 31, 1997 draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-03 November 11, 1997 draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-04 May 14, 1998 draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-05 June 17, 1998 draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-06 July 16, 1998 draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-07 August 7, 1998 draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-08 September 18, 1998 draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-09 September 28, 1998 Last call November 12, 1998 draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-10 December 15, 1998 draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-11 January 16, 1999 draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-12 February 2, 1999 Approved March 17, 1999 RFC 2543

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SIP Today

RFC 3261 (SIP: Session Initiation Protocol) RFC 3263 (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP): Locating SIP Servers) RFC 3264 (An Offer/Answer Model with Session Description Protocol (SDP)) RFC 3265 (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)-Specific Event Notification) RFC 3325 (Private Extensions to SIP for Asserted Identity within Trusted Networks) RFC 3327 (SIP Extension Header Field for Registering Non-Adjacent Contacts) RFC 3581 (An Extension to SIP for Symmetric Response Routing) RFC 3840 (Indicating User Agent Capabilities in SIP) RFC 4320 (Actions Addressing Issues Identified with the Non-INVITE Transaction in SIP) RFC 4474 (Enhancements for Authenticated Identity Management in SIP) GRUU (Obtaining and Using Globally Routable User Agent Identifiers (GRUU) in SIP) OUTBOUND (Managing Client Initiated Connections through SIP) RFC 4566 (Session Description Protocol) SDP-CAP (SDP Capability Negotiation) ICE (Interactive Connectivity Establishment) RFC 3605 (Real Time Control Protocol (RTCP) Attribute in the Session Description Protocol) RFC 4916 (Connected Identity in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) RFC 3311 (The SIP UPDATE Method) SIPS-URI (The Use of the SIPS URI Scheme in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) RFC 3665 (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Basic Call Flow Examples)

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5411

Don’t

Panic!

A Hitchhiker's Guide to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Q.931 (TDM)
  • H.323 (IP)

Alternative protocols…

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Why SIP is kind of a big deal

slide-16
SLIDE 16

It’s all about the decentralization

Internet

linuxcon.com 20.20.20.20 SIP Proxy DNS SIP DNS atlanta.com SIP Proxy Media bob@linuxcon.com alice@atlanta.com 2. Where is the SIP server for linuxcon.com? 20.20.20.20 and port 5061 1. Alice places call to bob@linuxcon.com. 3. INVITE is sent to 20.20.20.20 addressed to bob@linuxcon.com 4. INVITE is forwarded to the user bob, who answers, and the media is established between Alice and Bob.
slide-17
SLIDE 17

SIP and DNS (RFC 3263)

  • Use DNS SRV records for determining what

servers provide SIP services for a domain (internal and external)

sipserver A 10.0.0.1 ; SRV’s _sips._tcp IN SRV 50 1 5061 sipserver.yourdomain.com. _sip._tcp IN SRV 90 1 5060 sipserver.yourdomain.com. _sip._udp IN SRV 100 1 5060 sipserver.yourdomain.com. ; NAPTR IN NAPTR 50 50 "s" "SIPS+D2T" "" _sips._tcp.yourdomain.com. IN NAPTR 90 50 "s" "SIP+D2T" "" _sip._tcp.yourdomain.com. IN NAPTR 100 50 "s" "SIP+D2U" "" _sip._udp.yourdomain.com.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

SIP and DNS (cont.)

  • Use ENUM records for determining what URI

a full E.164 number should map to

  • Politics restrict this from being a viable
  • ption. Screenshot from the ITU website:

; NAPTR for calling +12561234567 $ORIGIN 7.6.5.4.3.2.1.6.5.2.1.e164.arpa. IN NAPTR 100 10 “u" "E2U+sip" “!^.*$!sip:bob@linuxcon.com!” .

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Inside SIP

slide-20
SLIDE 20

User Agents Client Server

TCP or UDP port 5060 TLS on port 5061

slide-21
SLIDE 21

SIP Methods

METHOD DESCRIPTION

INVITE Session setup ACK Acknowledgement of final response to INVITE BYE Session termination CANCEL Pending session cancellation REGISTER Registration of a user’s URI OPTIONS Query of options and capabilities INFO Mid-call signaling transport PRACK Provisional response acknowledgement UPDATE Update session information REFER Transfer user to a URI SUBSCRIBE Request notification of an event NOTIFY Transport of subscribed event notification MESSAGE Transport of an instant message body PUBLISH Upload presence state to a server

slide-22
SLIDE 22

SIP Responses

Status Message

100 Trying 180 Ringing 183 Session Progress 200 OK 300 Multiple Choices 302 Moved Temporarily 305 Use Proxy 400 Bad Request 401 Unauthorized 402 Payment Required 403 Forbidden 404 Not Found 500 Internal Server Error 501 Not Implemented 502 Bad Gateway

CLASS DESCRIPTION

1xx Provisional or Informational 2xx Success 3xx Redirection 4xx Client Error 5xx Server Error 6xx Global Failure

slide-23
SLIDE 23

SIP Roles

Element Function

Proxy Responsible for routing Registrar Accepts REGISTER request from endpoints Redirect Generates 3xx responses Back to Back User Agent (B2BUA) Terminates SIP dialogs from UAC and creates new dialog to end destination Session Border Controller (SBC) Demarcation between disparate networks Media Gateway Media translation

slide-24
SLIDE 24

SIP Element Examples

Service Provider

SBC Proxy Registrar/B2BUA Media Gateway SIP TDM Redirect
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Basic Call Flow

INVITE

Phone B Phone A

180 Ringing 200 OK ACK Media BYE 200 OK

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Call Flow with Proxy

INVITE

Proxy (Server/Client) Phone (Client) Phone (Server)

INVITE 100 Trying 180 Ringing 180 Ringing 200 OK 200 OK ACK Media BYE 200 OK

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Example SIP INVITE

INVITE <sip:bob@linuxcon.com> SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP pc33.atlanta.com;branch=z9hG4bK776asdhds Max-Forwards: 70 To: Bob <sip:bob@linuxcon.com> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.com>;tag=1928301774 Call-ID: a84b4c76e66710@pc33.atlanta.com CSeq: 314159 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@pc33.atlanta.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 142 v=0

  • =alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 linuxcon.com

s=SIP Call c=IN IP4 216.81.194.139 t=0 0 m=audio 32894 RTP/AVP 0 101 a=rtpmap: 0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap: 101 iLBC/8000

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Example SIP OK

SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP server10.linuxcon.com ;branch=z9hG4bKnashds8;received= 216.81.194.139 To: Bob <sip:bob@linuxcon.com>;tag=a6c85cf From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.com>;tag=1928301774 Call-ID: a84b4c76e66710@pc33.atlanta.com CSeq: 314159 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@192.0.2.4> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 131 v=0

  • =alice 7844 125 IN IP4 10.0.0.1

s=SIP Call c=IN IP4 10.0.0.1 t=0 0 m=audio 43588 RTP/AVP 0 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap: 0 PCMU/8000

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Presence

  • Real-time indicator of a

person’s willingness and availability to communicate

  • Blends communication

methods together, allows for designating preferred contact method

slide-30
SLIDE 30

SIMPLE – Powering Presence in SIP

  • Session Initiation Protocol

for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions

  • Uses the SIP methods of PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE,

and NOTIFY, defined in RFC’s 3903, 3265, and 3856

  • http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/simple/
slide-31
SLIDE 31

XMPP– Powering Presence in SIP

  • EXtensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
  • Uses XML messages and a

Publisher/Subscriber model for messages, defined in RFC’s 6120, 6121, and 6122

  • http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/XMPP/
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Open Source (and one proprietary) SIP Server Options

Knowledge without practice is useless. Practice without knowledge is dangerous.

  • Confucius
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Two main types of SIP servers

  • Back-to-Back User Agent (B2BUA)

– owns each leg of call as a separate dialog – Stateful – inter-work SIP with other protocols, including TDM and analog interfaces – More like traditional telephony – Doesn’t scale as well as a Proxy

  • Proxy

– Relays messages between UACs and other SIP entities – Stateless option – SIP-only (with some exceptions) – some trouble exists with the way endpoints implement some features (like transfers) – Future proof

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Asterisk – B2BUA/Media Server

  • B2BUA…so it stays in the signaling (and media)

path

  • Provides ACD, Voicemail, and IVR functionality
  • Most popular VoIP project in the world
  • Backed by Digium in Huntsville, AL
  • Rooted in traditional telephony
  • Struggles with NAT traversal
slide-35
SLIDE 35

FreeSWITCH

  • B2BUA, stays in the signaling (and media) path
  • Provides ACD, Voicemail, and IVR functionality
  • Used by other projects for its media

processing capabilities

  • Geared for replacing a PBX
slide-36
SLIDE 36

sipXecs

  • Composed of sipX (Proxy), FreeSWITCH

(media), OpenFire (IM & Presence)

  • Backed by eZuce in Andover, MA; but run by

SIPfoundry

  • Biggest user is Amazon with 5,000 users
  • Marketed as an open source Unified

Communications solution

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Kamailio

  • Registrar, Redirect, Proxy
  • 1&1 uses Kamailio and has 1 billion minutes

per month of usage through the platform

  • Frequently used to “front-end” other SIP

servers such as Asterisk or FreeSWITCH

  • Kamailio does NOT handle media (relies on

Asterisk or FreeSWITCH for that)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

OpenSIPS

  • Registrar, Redirect, Proxy
  • Fork of what Kamailio came from (SIP Express

Router or SER)

  • Frequently used to “front-end” other SIP

servers such as Asterisk or FreeSWITCH

  • OpenSIPS does NOT handle media (relies on

Asterisk or FreeSWITCH for that)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

reSIProcate

  • Proxy, Location, STUN/TURN
  • Initial VOCAL stack started by Vovida Networks

“back in the day”, then was acquired by Cisco

  • reSIProcate founded in 2002, moved to

SIPfoundry, then went independent in 2006

  • reSIProcate stacks used by commercial

products(through a “BSD-like” license) from Cisco, Avaya, LifeSize, Plantronics, Motorola, Ericsson, and more

slide-40
SLIDE 40

STUN and TURN and ICE, oh my!

  • NAT traversal for endpoints is…troublesome
  • Kamailio or OpenSIPS with RTPproxy or

MediaProxy

  • reSIProcate (repro + reTurn) (STUN and TURN

but no RFC ICE support)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Proprietary: Cisco CallManager (CUCM)

  • B2BUA for all types of SIP calls (trunk and line)
  • Cisco’s implementation is 100% standards

compatible SIP…except when it’s not.

  • There are “extensions” to SIP implemented in

CUCM for Cisco’s SCCP protocol feature parity to handsets

  • Leads to two modes of SIP support for phones,

basic and advanced. Basic is no bueno.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Open Source SIP Client Options

Product Version Linux Win Mac Android iOS SIP XMPP NAT Traversal Jitsi 2.2 X X X X X TURN Blink 0.5.0 X X Pro X ICE Empathy 3.8.4 X X X ICE Linphone 3.6.0 X X X X (2.0) X (2.0) X ICE cSipSimple 1.01 X X ICE

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Future of SIP

How does this get me my flying car?

  • Me, a child of the 80’s
slide-44
SLIDE 44

SIP-based UC is spreading

slide-45
SLIDE 45

P2P SIP

  • Decentralized SIP Services
  • Uses overlay networks and

Distributed Hash Tables

  • REsource LOcation And

Discovery (RELOAD)

  • No RFCs, only drafts

C A B http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/p2psip/

slide-46
SLIDE 46

WebRTC

  • sipml5.org
  • HTML5 Web-based SIP clients
  • Enables future B2C, B2B, P2P, and any other

acronym you can think of

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Where do we go now?

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Q&A

Questions?

slide-49
SLIDE 49

The End

“Due to technological advances, changes in consumer preference, and market forces, the question is when, not if, POTS service and the PSTN over which it is provided will become

  • bsolete.”
  • AT&T Response to FCC on PSTN Evolution, Dec 2009
slide-50
SLIDE 50

Appendix

Additional Reference Slides

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Offer/Answer Model

INVITE w/SDP (offer) 200 OK w/SDP (answer) INVITE w/o SDP 200 OK w/SDP (offer) ACK w/SDP (answer) ACK

Early Offer Delayed Offer

slide-52
SLIDE 52

REFER (Transfer)

INVITE

Phone B Phone A Phone C

INVITE 200 OK 200 OK ACK ACK Media Session REFER (Refer-To: C) 202 Accepted 200 OK Media Session NOTIFY 200 OK BYE

slide-53
SLIDE 53

PRACK (Provisional Acknowledgement)

INVITE 100 Trying 183 Session Progress 200 OK ACK PRACK 200 OK (PRACK) PRACK sip:8000@172.16.184.83:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.13.87:5060 ;branch=z9hG4bKC384 From: <sip:9000@172.16.13.87>;tag=1EDC10-2436 To: <sip:8000@172.16.184.83>;tag=85E9C7C8-A4C Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:33:42 GMT Call-ID: D110EA36-2BE211D6-801CEF21- DD62106B@172.16.13.87 CSeq: 102 PRACK RAck: 3696 101 INVITE Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0

slide-54
SLIDE 54

OPTIONS Ping

OPTIONS sip:8000@172.16.184.83:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.13.87:5060;branch=z9hG4bKC384 From: <sip:9000@172.16.13.87>;tag=1EDC10-2436 To: <sip:8000@172.16.184.83>;tag=85E9C7C8-A4C Call-ID: D110EA36-2BE211D6-801CEF21- DD62106B@172.16.13.87 CSeq: 100 OPTIONS Contact: <sip:9000@172.16.13.87> Accept: application/sdp Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0

OPTIONS 200 OK

slide-55
SLIDE 55

SIMPLE Presence Example

IP PBX PUBLISH NOTIFY SUBSCRIBE SIMPLE Server On Hook / Off Hook
slide-56
SLIDE 56

XMPP Presence Example

IP PBX Presence Stanza Presence Stanza XMPP Server On Hook / Off Hook

<presence xml:lang="en"> <show>on hook</show> </presence>