singular optimal control a degenerate parabolic
play

Singular Optimal Control : a Degenerate Parabolic-Hyperbolic example - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Singular Optimal Control : a Degenerate Parabolic-Hyperbolic example Mamadou Gueye, Universidad Federico Santa Mara Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Applications A conference in the honor of Jean-Michel Coron for his 60th birthday


  1. Singular Optimal Control : a Degenerate Parabolic-Hyperbolic example Mamadou Gueye, Universidad Federico Santa María Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Applications A conference in the honor of Jean-Michel Coron for his 60th birthday Paris June, 20 1

  2. Introduction Let ( ε, T, L, M ) ∈ (0 , + ∞ ) 3 × R . We consider  y t − εy xx + My x = 0 in (0 , L ) × (0 , L ) ,    ( TD ) y (0 , t ) = u ( t ) , y ( L, t ) = 0 on (0 , T ) ,  y ( x, 0) = y 0 ( x )  in (0 , L ) .  For y 0 ∈ H − 1 (0 , L ) we denote by U ( ε, T, L, M, y 0 ) the set of controls u ∈ L 2 (0 , T ) such that the corresponding solution of ( TD ) satisfies y ( · , T ) ≡ 0 . We can define the quantity which measures the cost of the null controllability of ( TD ): � min {� u � L 2 (0 ,T ) : u ∈ U ( ε, T, L, M, y 0 ) } � K ( ε, T, L, M ) := sup . � y 0 � H − 1(0 ,L ) ≤ 1 The underlying transport equation is controllable if and only if T > L/ | M | . J.-M. Coron and S. Guerrero Singular optimal control: A linear 1-D parabolic-hyperbolic example, 2005. Paris June, 20 2

  3. State of the art � O. Glass 2009, Uniform controllability � P. Lissy 2012, Link with cost of controllability in small time � S. Guerrero, G. Lebeau 2007, Higher dimension and Lipschitz transport coefficient � O. Glass, S Guerrero 2007, Uniform controllability of the Burgers equation � M. Léautaud 2010, Uniform controllability of scalar conservation laws Paris June, 20 3

  4. Degenerate transport diffusion equations Let ( ε, T, L, M, α ) ∈ (0 , + ∞ ) 4 × (0 , 1) . We consider  y t − ε ( x α +1 y x ) x + Mx α y x = 0 in (0 , L ) × (0 , L ) ,    ( TD ) y (0 , t ) = u ( t ) , y ( L, t ) = 0 on (0 , T ) ,  y ( x, 0) = y 0 ( x )  in (0 , L ) .  Assume that ( TD ) is null controllable in some space H , we denote by U ( ε, T, L, M, α, y 0 ) the set of controls u ∈ L 2 (0 , T ) such that the corresponding solution of ( TD ) satisfies y ( · , T ) ≡ 0 . � We are interested in the behaviour of the cost of the null controllability: � min {� u � L 2 (0 ,T ) : u ∈ U ( ε, T, L, M, α, y 0 ) } � K ( ε, T, L, M, α ) := sup . � y 0 � H ≤ 1 � For every ( ε, T, L, M, α ) ∈ (0 , + ∞ ) 4 × (0 , 1) such that M/ε > α and any y 0 ∈ L 2 ((0 , L ); x − M/ε d x ) , there exits a control u ∈ L 2 (0 , T ) sush that the associated solution to ( TD ) satisfies y ( · , T ) ≡ 0 . Paris June, 20 4

  5. A singular Sturm-Liouville Problem Consider the differential expression defined by A [ y ]( x ) := − ε ( x α +1 y ′ ) ′ + Mx α y ′ = λy ( x ) , x ∈ (0 , L ) , λ ∈ R . � Particular case of Bessel differential equation x 2 y ′′ + axy ′ + ( bx ℓ + c ) y = 0 , x ∈ (0 , ∞ ) , ℓ � = 0 . The solutions can be written in terms of Bessel functions: 2 (1 − a ) Z ν ( κ − 1 √ ν := 1 κ := ℓ 1 � (1 − a ) 2 − 4 c , bx κ ) , b � = 0 : y ( x ) = x 2 , ℓ � Then, under the structural assumption M/ε > α , we can prove that ( A , D ( A )) is self- adjoint on L 2 ((0 , L ); x − M/ε d x ) and generates an analytic semigroup of bounded linear operators S ( t ) t ≥ 0 . Let ν := ( M/ε − α ) / (1 − α ) and κ := 1 2 (1 − α ) , we have 1 (2 κ ) 2 1 Φ n ( x ) := 2 ( M/ε − α ) J ν ( j ν,n x κ ) , λ n := ε ( κj ν,n ) 2 ν ( j ν,n ) | x x ∈ (0 , 1) . | J ′ Paris June, 20 5

  6. Uniform Controllablity There exist Q ( T, L, M, α ) > 0 and C ( T, L, M, α ) > 0 such that, for every ( ε, T, L, M, α ) ∈ (0 , + ∞ ) 4 × (0 , 1) such that M/ε > α , we have √ 6) L 1 − α � � −Q ( T, L, M, α ) T > (2 K ( ε, α, T, L, M ) ≤ exp if ε M (1 − α ) and T < (0 , 98) L 1 − α � � C ( T, L, M, α ) if K ( ε, α, T, L, M ) ≥ exp M (1 − α ) . ε � G., P. Lissy, Singular optimal control of a 1 − D Parabolic-Hyperbolic Degenerate equation, accepted in ESAIM- Control Optim. Calc. Var. Paris June, 20 6

  7. The moment method � Let y 0 ∈ L 2 ((0 , L ); x − M/ε d x ) := H . Then u ∈ U ( ε, T, L, M, α, y 0 ) if and only if � T H = − ( M/ε − α )(2 j ν,n ) ν � y 0 , Φ n � 0 u ( t ) exp ( − λ n ( T − t )) d t, ∀ n ∈ N \{ 0 } . 2 ν Γ( ν + 1) � Find a biorthogonal family { Ψ k ( t ) } k ∈ N \{ 0 } � T 0 Ψ k ( t ) e − λ ℓ ( T − t ) dt = δ kℓ , k, ℓ ∈ N \{ 0 } . � Construct a family { J k ( z ) } k ∈ N \{ 0 } of entire functions of exponential type satisfying J k ( − iλ ℓ ) = δ kℓ , k, ℓ ∈ N \{ 0 } . � Then using Paley-Wiener theorem to construct the biorthogonal family by inverse Fourier transform. Paris June, 20 7

  8. Some elements of proof I An entire function having {− iε ( κj ν,k ) 2 , k ∈ N \{ 0 }} as simple zeros is � √ 2 √ εκ � ν + ∞ � � � � iz iz � Λ( z ) := 1 − = Γ( ν + 1) √ J ν √ εκ . ε ( κj ν,k ) 2 iz k =1 Moreover, Λ( · ) is of exponential type and   � | z | as | Λ( z ) | ≤ exp | z | → + ∞ . κ √ ε     � Now, we consider Λ( z ) ˜ J k ( z ) := Λ ′ ( − iλ k )( z + iλ k ) , one easily deduces that ˜ J k ( − iλ l ) = δ kl . � ˜ J k ( z ) cannot be bounded on the real line. Paris June, 20 8

  9. Some elements of proof I We must use a multiplier to make the functions ˜ J k ( · ) bounded on the real line and of relevant exponential type. Let us set H ( z ) J k ( z ) := ˜ J k ( z ) H ( − iλ k ) . � Where, H is constructed to satisfy  H ( − iλ k ) ≥ C β ∀ k ≥ 1 ,    | H ( z ) | ≤ e β |ℑ ( z ) | ( Mult ) ∀ z ∈ C ,  H ( ix ) ≥ Ce γ | x |  ∀ x ∈ R .  C , β and γ to be chosen in terms of ε, T, M, α . We follow G. Tenenbaum and M. Tucsnak. � Precise asymptotics estimates for Bessel functions and their zeros. Paris June, 20 9

  10. Some elements of proof II � Let u the optimal control assiociated to the first eigenvalue. Let us introduce the function f : C → C define by � − T/ 2 � � s − iδ t + T � � − it ε f ( s ) := − T/ 2 u e d t s ∈ C . 2 for a δ > 0 , that will be choosen later. Then, f is an entire function satifying ( εκj ν,k ) 2 + δ � � f ( a k ) = 0 , k ∈ N \{ 0 , 1 } , with a k := i k ∈ N \{ 0 } . , � Moreover, f satisfies K T 1 / 2 | J ′ � � ν ( j ν, 1 ) | log | f ( s ) | ≤ T |ℑ ( s ) − δ | √ + log . 2 ε 2 κ � Classical representation of entire functions of exponential type A in C + � + ∞ ∞ � � � + ℑ ( z ) log | f ( s ) | z − a ℓ � � � log | f ( z ) | = Aℑ ( z ) + log | s − z | 2 d s. � � � z − a ℓ � π −∞ � ℓ =1 Paris June, 20 10

  11. Some open problems � What to do if M < 0 . � Diffusion with constant coefficient. � BV coefficients. � Higher dimension Paris June, 20 11

  12. Happy Birthday Jean-Michel Paris June, 20 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend