singlet assisted electroweak phase transitions and
play

Singlet Assisted Electroweak Phase Transitions and Precision Higgs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Singlet Assisted Electroweak Phase Transitions and Precision Higgs Studies Peter Winslow Based on: PRD 91 , 035018 (2015) (arXiv:1407.5342) S. Profumo, M. Ramsey-Musolf, C. Wainwright, P. Winslow arXiv:1510.XXXX A. Kotwal, J. M. No, M.


  1. Singlet Assisted Electroweak Phase Transitions and Precision Higgs Studies Peter Winslow Based on: PRD 91 , 035018 (2015) (arXiv:1407.5342) S. Profumo, M. Ramsey-Musolf, C. Wainwright, P. Winslow arXiv:1510.XXXX A. Kotwal, J. M. No, M. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Winslow Probing EWPT with 1/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  2. Outline Singlets : Collider Physics Cosmology The xSM : a Minimally Extended Scalar Sector 1 st Order Phase Transitions: Electroweak Baryogenesis in the xSM NextGen Colliders: A motivation from Cosmology Probing EWPT with 2/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  3. LHC has thrown open the door to the scalar sector of the SM! … but where’s all the NP? Probing EWPT with 3/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  4. No obvious hints from CKM-ology or EWPO either … Global EW fit Indirect determination G fitter SM Jul ’14 Measurement M H M W Γ W M Z Γ Z 0 σ had 0 R lep 0,l A FB A (LEP) l A (SLD) l lept 2 sin (Q ) Θ eff FB A c A b 0,c A Options : FB 0,b A FB 0 R à Heavy NP c 0 R b à Weakly coupled NP m t 2 α (M ) s Z à Clever NP (compressed (5) 2 ∆ α (M ) had Z spectra, etc.) -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 (O - O) / σ à Hidden Sectors / Singlets tot indirect Probing EWPT with 4/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  5. Singlets: - Less constrained (possibly still weak scale) SM NP - Typically still couple to SM via portals à Interesting collider signatures Higgs Portal - Also motivated by real cosmological problems ∆ L ⊃ O NP | H | 2 Probing EWPT with 5/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  6. Singlets: - Less constrained (possibly still weak scale) Electroweak Baryogenesis - Typically still couple to SM via portals à Interesting collider signatures - Also motivated by real cosmological problems à Matter/Antimatter Asymmetry - Higgs portals can modify character of EWPT à Strongly 1 st order EWPT à Highly motivated by EWBG Requirement of a SFOEWPT identifies a preferred parameter space à Cosmological motivation for collider searches Probing EWPT with 6/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  7. The xSM: a useful toy model Secluded Self − Interactions z }| { ⇣ a 1 2 S 2 ⌘ 2 S + a 2 b 2 2 S 2 + b 3 3 S 3 + b 4 | H | 2 4 S 4 V xSM ( H, S ) = V SM ( H ) + + | {z } Higgs P ortal G + ✓ ◆ H = , S = x 0 + s 1 � v 0 + h + iG 0 � √ 2 Higgs Mixing ✓ ◆ ✓ ◆ ✓ ◆ cos θ sin θ h 1 h = sin 2 θ = ( a 1 + 2 a 2 x 0 ) v 0 h 2 − sin θ cos θ s ( m 2 1 − m 2 2 ) - Set m h1 = 125 GeV - h 1 (h 2 ) couplings to SM rescaled by cos θ (sin θ ) - Singlet inherits SM couplings entirely from mixing à searches for heavy scalars à EW precision observables Probing EWPT with 7/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  8. Strong 1 st order EWPTs in the xSM Connecting to EWPT requires finite temperature effective potential V eff ( φ , T ) = V 0 ( φ ) + V CW ( φ ) + V T 6 =0 ( φ , T ) + V Ring-sum ( φ , T ) Probing EWPT with 8/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  9. Strong 1 st order EWPTs in the xSM Connecting to EWPT requires finite temperature effective potential V eff ( φ , T ) = V 0 ( φ ) + V CW ( φ ) + V T 6 =0 ( φ , T ) + V Ring-sum ( φ , T ) à Gauge dependent!! JHEP 1107 (2011) 029 à Independence restored at high temperature ¯ λ 0 ) φ 2 + e φ 3 + High T ¯ D ( T 2 − T 2 V eff ( φ , α , T ) xSM 4 φ 4 = ⇒ √ v ( T ) / 2 = φ ( T ) cos α ( T ) , x ( T ) = φ ( T ) sin α ( T ) SFOEWPT driven by tree-level parameters Condition for SFOEWPT à à Classical transition cos α ( T c ) ∆ φ ( T c ) ✓ a 1 ◆ 2 cos 2 α + b 3 & 1 3 sin 2 α e = sin α T c e λ = λ cos 4 α + a 2 2 cos 2 α sin 2 α + b 4 = ⇒ − cos α ( T c ) λ & 1 4 sin 4 α ¯ 2 T c ¯ Probing EWPT with 9/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  10. Strong 1 st order EWPTs in the xSM General requirements for SFOEWPT: - Large cos α ( T c ) - Large, negative a 1 - linearly related to T C λ à Raises barrier à correlated with T C λ SFOEWPT driven by tree-level parameters Condition for SFOEWPT à à Classical transition cos α ( T c ) ∆ φ ( T c ) ✓ a 1 ◆ 2 cos 2 α + b 3 & 1 3 sin 2 α e = sin α T c e λ = λ cos 4 α + a 2 2 cos 2 α sin 2 α + b 4 = ⇒ − cos α ( T c ) λ & 1 4 sin 4 α ¯ 2 T c ¯ Probing EWPT with 10/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  11. Strong 1 st order EWPTs in the xSM General requirements for SFOEWPT: - Large cos α ( T c ) - Large, negative a 1 - linearly related to T C λ à Raises barrier à correlated with T C λ True value is slightly higher in xSM PRD 90 (2014) 1, 015015 SFOEWPT driven by tree-level parameters Condition for SFOEWPT à à Classical transition cos α ( T c ) ∆ φ ( T c ) ✓ a 1 ◆ 2 cos 2 α + b 3 & 1 3 sin 2 α e = sin α T c e λ = λ cos 4 α + a 2 2 cos 2 α sin 2 α + b 4 = ⇒ − cos α ( T c ) λ & 1 4 sin 4 α ¯ 2 T c ¯ Probing EWPT with 11/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  12. Phenomenology depends largely on mass Possible collider signatures m 2 < 2 m 1 à BSM Higgs-like decay modes m 1 /2 < m 2 < 2 m 1 à Precision measurements m 2 > 2 m 1 à Resonant di-Higgs(-like) production Probing EWPT with 12/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  13. Phenomenology depends largely on mass Possible collider signatures } m 2 < 2 m 1 à BSM Higgs-like decay modes Motivates precision m 1 /2 < m 2 < 2 m 1 à Precision measurements measurements at future colliders m 2 > 2 m 1 à Resonant di-Higgs(-like) production Probing EWPT with 13/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  14. Phenomenology depends largely on mass Possible collider signatures } m 2 < 2 m 1 à BSM Higgs-like decay modes Motivates precision m 1 /2 < m 2 < 2 m 1 à Precision measurements measurements at future colliders m 2 > 2 m 1 à Resonant di-Higgs(-like) production In progress … Also, see Chien-Yi’s Talk! What do we know from current LHC? What can we learn from future colliders? Probing EWPT with 14/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  15. Indirect Searches: Higgs-like coupling measurements Fit to current data Sensitivity from projected uncertainties ! 2 1 − cos 2 θ − cos 2 θ ◆ 2 ✓ µ obs X X χ 2 ( θ ) = χ 2 ( θ ) = i ∆ µ proj ∆ µ obs i i i i �� - ��� LHC: ��� - � ��� - � ���� ��� All 7-8 TeV data available 250 HL-LHC: √ s = 14 TeV, 3 ab -1 ATL-PHYS-PUB-2013-014, CMS-NOTE-13-002 200 m 2 ( GeV ) ILC-1: √ s = 250 GeV, 250 fb -1 150 ILC-3: √ s = 1 TeV, 1 ab -1 100 ILC Higgs White Paper TLEP: 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 √ s = 240 GeV, 1 ab -1 cos θ arXiv:1305.6498 Probing EWPT with 15/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  16. Indirect Searches: Oblique Parameters Effects are simple to calculate ∆ O = cos 2 θ O SM ( m 1 ) + sin 2 θ O SM ( m 2 ) − O SM ( m 1 ) O = S, T, U 1 − cos 2 θ O SM ( m 2 ) − O SM ( m 1 ) � � � � = �� - ��� ��� - � ��� - � ���� ��� 250 Perform full fit to current best-fit values from Gfitter 200 m 2 ( GeV ) σ 2 � − 1 X ∆ χ 2 = ∆ O i − ∆ O 0 ∆ O j − ∆ O 0 � �� � � i j ij 150 i,j Eur. Phys. J. C 72 , 2205 (2012) 100 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 cos θ Probing EWPT with 16/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  17. Direct searches: Null results from SM-like Higgs searches All h 2 -SM interactions rescaled by sin θ σ ( m 2 ) · BR( m 2 ) = 1 − cos 2 θ µ XX = σ SM ( m 2 ) · BR SM ( m 2 ) �� - ��� ��� - � ��� - � ���� ��� 250 LEP Searches 200 Phys. Lett. B 565 , 61 (2003) m 2 ( GeV ) 150 100 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 cos θ Probing EWPT with 17/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

  18. Direct searches: Null results from SM-like Higgs searches All h 2 -SM interactions rescaled by sin θ σ ( m 2 ) · BR( m 2 ) = 1 − cos 2 θ µ XX = σ SM ( m 2 ) · BR SM ( m 2 ) �� - ��� Higgs Discovery ��� - � ��� - � ���� ��� 250 LEP Searches 200 Phys. Lett. B 565 , 61 (2003) m 2 ( GeV ) LHC Searches 150 à ATLAS-CMS Combination Phys. Lett. B 716 , 1 (2012), Phys. Lett. B 716 , 30 (2012) 100 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 cos θ Probing EWPT with 18/31 Peter Winslow Singlet Assisted EWPTs and Precision Higgs Studies NextGen Colliders

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend