simpson correspondence in characteristic p 0 and
play

Simpson correspondence in characteristic p > 0 and splittings of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Simpson correspondence in characteristic p > 0 and splittings of the algebra of PD-differential operators Michel Gros (CNRS &University of Rennes I) Simons Symposium, Schloss Elmau, 7-13 May 2017 S a flat


  1. Simpson correspondence in characteristic p > 0 and splittings of the algebra of PD-differential operators Michel Gros (CNRS &University of Rennes I) Simons Symposium, Schloss Elmau, 7-13 May 2017

  2. � � � � � � S a flat scheme over Z / p 2 Z , S = ̃ ̃ S ⊗ Z p F p , X a smooth S -scheme, F X X ′ X F X / S X ◻ � S S F S Theorem 1 (Deligne-Illusie) X ′ and an ̃ (i) Given smooth ̃ S -schemes ̃ X and ̃ S -morphism X ′ lifting F X / S , there exists a canonical quasi- F ∶ ̃ ̃ X → ̃ isomorphism X ′ / S [ − i ] → F X / S ∗ ( Ω ● X / S ) , ⊕ i ≥ 0 Ω i inducing the Cartier operator C − 1 .

  3. (ii) If we are given only a smooth lifting ̃ X ′ of X ′ over ̃ S , there exists a canonical isomorphism in D b ( O X ′ ) X ′ / S [− i ] ∼ ⊕ p − 1 → τ < p F X / S ∗ ( Ω ● X / S ) . i = 0 Ω i X → S a smooth separated morphism, I ⊂ O X × S X the ideal of the diagonal, X / S = O X × S X / I n + 1 ( n ≥ 0 ) ; P n D X / S,n = H om O X ( P n X / S , O X ) P X / S, ( 0 ) the PD-envelop of I , I ⊂ P X / S, ( 0 ) the PD-ideal generated by I , X / S, ( 0 ) = P X / S, ( 0 ) / I [ n + 1 ] ( n ≥ 0 ) . P n

  4. D ( 0 ) X / S,n = H om O X ( P n X / S, ( 0 ) , O X ) [ O X -algebras via the first projection.] The O X -modules ⋃ D X / S D X / S,n = n ≥ 0 D ( 0 ) D ( 0 ) ⋃ X / S X / S,n , = n ≥ 0 are naturally equipped with ring structures. D ( 0 ) X / S is the sheaf of PD-differential operators.

  5. Assume in the following that p O S = 0 and X → S smooth. Proposition 2 The image of the composed homomor- phism D ( 0 ) X / S → D X / S ↪ E nd O S ( O X ) is the ring of O X ′ -linear endomorphisms of O X , and its kernel is the bilateral ideal K of D ( 0 ) X / S locally generated i (for 1 ≤ i ≤ d ∶ = dim ( X / S ) ); the latter by the operators ∂ p are elements of the center Z D ( 0 ) X / S of D ( 0 ) X / S . D ( 0 ) = D ( 0 ) X / S / K , X / S D ( 0 ) ̂ D ( 0 ) X / S / K n . X / S = lim ← � n ≥ 0

  6. ⇒ ∃ a canonical isomorphism of O X ′ -algebras F X / S ∗ ( D ( 0 ) X / S ) ∼ → E nd O X ′ ( F X / S ∗ O X ) . General result of linear algebra (example of Morita equiv- alence ) A a ring, M a non-trivial locally free A -module of finite type, B = E nd A ( M ) The functors: ψ ∶ Mod ( B ) → Mod ( A ) , ↦ H om B ( M , E ) , E φ ∶ Mod ( A ) → Mod ( B ) , F ↦ M ⊗ A F , are equivalences of categories quasi-inverse to each other ∼ ∼ ( φ ○ ψ can ψ ○ φ ). ev Id , Id �→ � � →

  7. By Morita equivalence , the functors: Mod ( D ( 0 ) X / S ) → Mod ( O X ′ ) , F X / S ∗ ( H om ( O X , E )) , D ( 0 ) E ↦ X / S → Mod ( D ( 0 ) Mod ( O X ′ ) X / S ) , F ∗ X / S ( F ) = F ⊗ O X ′ O X , F ↦ are equivalences of categories quasi-inverse to each other (Cartier’s Frobenius descent ). ∃ an O X -linear morphism X ( T X / S ) → Z D ( 0 ) D ↦ D p − D ( p ) . c ∶ F ∗ X / S , inducing an isomorphism of O X ′ -algebras S ( T X ′ / S ) ∼ c F X / S ∗ ( Z D ( 0 ) X / S ) . � →

  8. A left D ( 0 ) X / S -module ⇔ an O X -module E with an inte- grable connection ∇∶ E → E ⊗ O X Ω 1 X / S . Then, c induces an O X -linear morphism X / S ( Ω 1 X ′ / S ) , ψ ∶ E → E ⊗ O X F ∗ satisfying ψ ∧ ψ = 0 , called the p -curvature . ● ψ vanishes ⇔ the action of D ( 0 ) X / S factors through D ( 0 ) X / S . ● ψ is nilpotent ⇔ the action of D ( 0 ) X / S factors through D ( 0 ) X / S / K N for N ≫ 0 . ● ψ is quasi-nilpotent ⇔ ∀ x ∈ E , ∃ N ≥ 0 such that K N ⋅ x = 0 ( ⇒ the action of D ( 0 ) X / S on E extends to an action of ̂ D ( 0 ) X / S ).

  9. Want to extend Cartier’s Frobenius descent to quasi- nilpotent objects. Theorem 3 (Berthelot, Ogus-Vologodsky) Given smooth ̃ ̃ X ′ and an ̃ ̃ S -morphism ̃ F ∶ ̃ X → ̃ X ′ S -schemes X and lifting F X / S , there exists a canonical isomorphism of ̂ S ( T X ′ / S ) -algebras → F X / S ∗ ( D ( 0 ) X / S ) ∼ F ∶ F X / S ∗ ( ̂ D ( 0 ) X / S ) ⊗ O X ′ ̂ S ( T X ′ / S ) λ ̃ compatible with the natural augmentations to F X / S ∗ ( D ( 0 ) X / S ) . We deduce an isomorphism ∼ D ( 0 ) ̂ S ( T X ′ / S ) ( O X ⊗ O X ′ ̂ S ( T X ′ / S )) . → E nd ̂ X / S

  10. ̂ The lifting ̃ X / S (̂ D ( 0 ) S ( T X ′ / S )) with a left F equip F ∗ X / S - module structure and induces equiv. of cat. quasi- inverse to each other : Mod ( ̂ D ( 0 ) X / S ) → Mod (̂ S ( T X ′ / S )) , X / S (̂ ( F ∗ S ( T X ′ / S )) , E ) , E ↦ H om ̂ D ( 0 ) X / S S ( T X ′ / S )) → Mod ( ̂ D ( 0 ) Mod (̂ X / S ) , X / S (̂ X / S ( F ) = F ⊗ ̂ S ( T X ′ / S )) . F ↦ F ∗ S ( T X ′ / S ) F ∗ F an ̂ S ( T X ′ / S ) -module ⇒ T X ′ / S ⊗ O X ′ F → F ⇒ θ ∶ F → F ⊗ O X ′ Ω 1 X ′ / S O X ′ -linear; θ ∧ θ = 0 , [ θ is a called a Higgs field ]. This is Simpson correspondance in characteristic p > 0 .

  11. Proposition 4 The direct image by F X / S ∗ of the de Rham complex of E is quasi-isomorphic to the Higgs complex of F . Sketch of proof : Koszul resolution of O X ′ : S ( T X ′ / S ) ⊗ O X ′ ⋀ 2 T X ′ / S [ ... S ( T X ′ / S ) ⊗ O X ′ T X ′ / S S ( T X ′ / S )] O X ′ 0 ∼ S ( T X ′ / S ) (̂ S ( T X ′ / S ) ⊗ O X ′ ⋀ ● T X ′ / S , F ) F ⊗ O X ′ Ω ● H om ̂ → X ′ ∼ X / S (̂ ( F ∗ S ( T X ′ / S ) ⊗ O X ′ ⋀ ● T X ′ / S ) , E ) → H om ̂ D ( 0 ) � X / S

  12. � � � � Spencer resolution of O X : D ( 0 ) D ( 0 ) [ ... X / S ⊗ O X ⋀ 2 T X / S X / S ⊗ O X T X / S D ( 0 ) X / S ] O X 0 Reduced to compare two resolutions of O X . � ̂ ̂ D ( 0 ) D ( 0 ) X / S ] X / S ⊗ O X T X / S ⋯ O X P ↦ P. 1 X / S ̂ X / S ̂ S ( T X ′ / S ) ⊗ O X F ∗ S ( T X ′ / S )] � F ∗ � F ∗ X / S T X ′ / S ⋯ � O X commutes with left vertical arrow induced by the dual p ! d ( ̃ F ) ∶ F ∗ of 1 X / S Ω 1 X ′ / S → Ω 1 X / S .

  13. Sketch of proof of thm. 3 Will proceed by duality using Lemma 5 The ring ̂ D ( 0 ) X / S is isomorphic to the ring (of hyper-PD-differential operators) H om O X ( P X / S, ( 0 ) , O X ) . Local coordinates t 1 ,...,t d on X , τ i = 1 ⊗ t i − t i ⊗ 1 ∈ I . d ) .τ [ p.k ] is filtered Locally P X / S, ( 0 ) = ⊕ k O X × S X /( τ p 1 ,...,τ p increasingly and exhaustively by d ) .τ [ p.k ] Fil n P X / S, ( 0 ) = ⊕ ∣ k ∣ ≤ n O X × S X /( τ p 1 ,...,τ p on which K n + 1 acts trivially, hence H om O X ( Fil n P X / S, ( 0 ) P X / S, ( 0 ) , O X ) ∼ → D ( 0 ) X / S / K n + 1 .

  14. p ! ( F ∗ × F ∗ ) ∶ I → P X / S, ( 0 ) ; f → f [ p ] Lemma 6 The map 1 composed with the projection P X / S, ( 0 ) → P X / S, ( 0 ) / I . P X / S, ( 0 ) is an F ∗ X -linear map that is zero on I 2 . Linearization gives an O X -linear map : X ′ / S → P X / S, ( 0 ) / I . P X / S, ( 0 ) F ∗ X / S Ω 1 called divided Frobenius . Let Γ ( Ω 1 X ′ / S ) the PD-algebra of the O X ′ -module Ω 1 X ′ / S . Proposition 7 The divided Frobenius map extends uniquely to an isomorphism of PD- O X -algebras : X ′ / S ) ∼ X / S Γ ( Ω 1 → P X / S, ( 0 ) / I . P X / S, ( 0 ) . F ∗ �

  15. Description in local coordinates : t ′ 1 ,....,t ′ d the pull-back of the t i ’s. O X < dt ′ 1 ,....,dt ′ d > → O X < τ i ,....,τ d > /( τ 1 ,...,τ d ) τ [ p ] dt ′ ↦ i i Remark : The composite S ( T X ′ / S ) ∼ c F X / S ∗ ( Z D ( 0 ) X / S ) ↪ F X / S ∗ D ( 0 ) X / S . � → can be obtained by duality from the composite P X / S, ( 0 ) → ∼ � F ∗ P X / S, ( 0 ) / I . P X / S, ( 0 ) X / S Γ ( Ω 1 X ′ / S ) . ←

  16. Next step : show that the data of thm. 3 (we fix such smooth ̃ S -schemes ̃ X and ̃ X ′ and an ̃ S -morphism ̃ F ∶ ̃ X → ̃ X ′ lifting F X / S in the sequel) allows to canonically lift the latter isomorphism X ′ / S ) ∼ X / S Γ ( Ω 1 → P X / S, ( 0 ) / I . P X / S, ( 0 ) F ∗ � to a morphism X / S Γ ( Ω 1 X ′ / S ) → P X / S, ( 0 ) . F ∗

  17. �� Proposition 8 There exists a well-defined map ∼ p ! (̃ F ∗ × ̃ F ∗ ) ∶ ˜ S, ( 0 ) / p P ̃ 1 I ′ → p P ̃ P ̃ X /̃ X /̃ X /̃ S, ( 0 ) S, ( 0 ) ←� .p ! ∼ P X / S, ( 0 ) → � that factors through Ω 1 X ′ / S such that the induced map X ′ / S → P X / S, ( 0 ) is a lifting of the divided Frobenius : Ω 1 � P X / S, ( 0 ) Ω 1 X ′ / S � P X / S, ( 0 ) / I . P X / S, ( 0 ) Ω 1 X ′ / S commutes.

  18. Sketch of proof : want to understand (̃ F × ̃ F ) ∗ ∶ ˜ I ′ → ˜ I . Take x ∈ O X , x ′ ∶ = 1 ⊗ x ∈ O X ′ with lifts ˜ x ′ ∈ O ˜ X , ˜ X ′ , x ∈ O ˜ ̃ F ∗ ( ˜ x ′ ) = ˜ x p + py . ξ ′ ∶ = 1 ⊗ ˜ x ′ − ˜ x ′ ⊗ 1 ξ ∶ = 1 ⊗ ˜ x − ˜ x ⊗ 1 , ˜ ˜ (̃ F × ̃ F ) ∗ ( ˜ ξ ′ ) x p ⊗ 1 + p. ( 1 ⊗ y − y ⊗ 1 ) x p − ˜ 1 ⊗ ˜ = p − 1 ( p i )( ˜ x p − i ⊗ 1 ) ˜ ξ i + p ( 1 ⊗ y − y ⊗ 1 ) ξ p + ˜ ∑ = i = 1 ξ p mod p ˜ ˜ I ≡ Hence (̃ F × ̃ ξ [ p ] + pζ ∈ P ̃ F ) ∗ ( ˜ ξ ′ ) = p ! . ˜ X /̃ S, ( 0 ) with ζ ∈ ˜ I . Then divides by p ! .

  19. Proposition 9 . The divided Frobenius extends canon- ically to a morphism F ∗ X / S Γ ( Ω 1 X ′ / S ) → P X / S, ( 0 ) that, by duality, induces a morphism of O X -modules : D ( 0 ) D ( 0 ) F ∶ ̂ S ( T X ′ / S )) ↪ ̂ X / S (̂ X / S → F ∗ Φ ̃ X / S Warning : Φ ̃ F is not a morphism of rings but its re- striction to the center is one.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend