Sherman Sherman-Denison Sherman Sherman-Denison Denison Denison - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Sherman Sherman-Denison Sherman Sherman-Denison Denison Denison - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Sherman Sherman-Denison Sherman Sherman-Denison Denison Denison Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (BPP) Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (BPP) Sherman-Denison BPP Sherman Denison BPP Both Sherman and Denison have established, more , traditional
Sherman-Denison BPP Sherman Denison BPP
Both Sherman and Denison have established, more
, traditional neighborhoods, as well as newly developed communities within and around the fringes
- f the city limits
- f the city limits.
Both cities have many local destinations that, if
connected, could be easily accessed by clearly identifiable and separated bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
Destinations considered include
but are not limited
Destinations considered include – but are not limited
to – shopping centers, employment centers, local schools, the college campuses, libraries and parks.
I th 2040 MTP d ft In the 2040 MTP draft…
P.1.2. The 2040 Plan will identify policies that
improve safety for bicyclists and pedestrians within the walking shed of elementary and middle schools the walking-shed of elementary and middle schools.
P.1.3. Transportation improvements will be P.1.3. Transportation improvements will be
considered that increase safety for vulnerable users such as pedestrians, bicyclists, disabled travelers, and children and children.
Aims of the 2014 BPP study Aims of the 2014 BPP study
Identify meaningful metrics and criteria, Identify meaningful metrics and criteria, Ensure equitable inclusion and outcomes, Streamline mobility and access methodologies Streamline mobility and access methodologies, Commitment to quality of life, health, well-being, Advocate mobility partnerships that add value Advocate mobility partnerships that add value, Protect and enhance environmental resources, Advance cities' and region's economic Advance cities' and region's economic
sustainability.
Current conditions Current conditions
Current conditions Current conditions
Current conditions Current conditions
C t diti C t diti Current conditions Current conditions
Current conditions Current conditions
Sherman Sherman-Denison BPP Denison BPP
FINDINGS / RECOMMENDATIONS
Safe school access:
Team identified gaps in the existing gaps in the existing sidewalk system around elementary and secondary and secondary schools within each attendance area.
Sidewalk Gaps
(Note: (Note: TAP SRTS TAP SRTS-
- type
type j t j t projects can projects can extend up to 2 extend up to 2 miles) miles)
Mays E.S. after school cue Mays E.S. after school cue
Rural Rail Transportation Districts Rural Rail Transportation Districts NC RRTD created in 1995 is inactive NC RRTD created in 1995 is inactive Inactive RR's could be potential trails. Inactive RR's could be potential trails.
NC NC RRTD t d i 1995 i RRTD t d i 1995 i i ti i ti NC NC RRTD created in 1995 is RRTD created in 1995 is inactive. inactive. Inactive RR's could be potential trails. Inactive RR's could be potential trails.
Class III Bikeways – Bike Routes and Wayfinding y g Total 43 9 miles Total 43.9 miles Cost ranges: g $439,000-$636,600 (both cities)
R d ti S (d ft) Recommendations Summary: (draft) Class III Bikeways - Bike Routes, Wayfinding
location distance range of potential costs
Denison 29.1 mi.
$ 291,000-422,400 $ , ,
Sherman 14.8 mi.
$ 147,700-214,300
Class II Bikeways – Bike Lanes, Buffered Bike Lanes, Cycle Tracks
Recommendations Summary: (draft) Class II Bikeways – Class II Bikeways Bike Lanes, Buffered Bike Lanes, or Cycle Tracks
location distance range of potential costs
D i 8 0 i $ 160 000 200 000
Denison 8.0 mi.
$ 160,000-200,000
Sherman 20.4 mi.
$ 408,000-510,000
Class I Bikeways – Off-Street Sh d U P th Shared Use Paths
Recommendations Summary: (draft) Class I Bikeways – y Off-Street Shared Use Paths
location distance range of potential costs
Denison 8.4 mi.
$ 2,520,000-3,780,000
Sherman 15.2 mi.
$ 4,560,000-6,840,000
How to fund?
Proposed Candidate Scoring Criteria for Access to: Proposed Candidate Scoring Criteria for Access to:
NOTE: Weightings can be subject to local priorities NOTE: Weightings can be subject to local priorities.
- Schools (any level)
5
- Parks, tourist destinations
4
- Large employer
5
- Transit
3
- Multi-family mixed-use dense
5
- Multi family, mixed use, dense
5
- Shopping
3
- Includes Bike Parking/or it exists
5 S t d b Cit 10
- Supported by City
10
- Environmental Justice Area
10
- Right of way availability
15
- In current CIP
15
- Serves both Bike and Ped
10
- Meets regional criteria
10
- Meets regional criteria
10
- Total Maximum Points
100
Aims of the 2014 BPP study Aims of the 2014 BPP study
Identify meaningful metrics and criteria, Identify meaningful metrics and criteria, Ensure equitable inclusion and outcomes, Streamline mobility and access methodologies Streamline mobility and access methodologies, Commitment to quality of life, health, well-being, Advocate accretive mobility partnerships Advocate accretive mobility partnerships, Protect and enhance environmental resources, Advance cities' and region's economic Advance cities' and region's economic
sustainability.
Thank you! Thank you!
Q&A Q&A
Class II Bikeways – Bike Lanes, Buffered Bike Lanes, or Cycle Tracks , , y
Class I Bikeways – Off Street Shared Use Paths Off-Street Shared Use Paths
Class III Bikeways – Denison Bike Routes and Wayfinding
Location Miles Estimate of Potential Cost / Range Ray-Bond 2.1 $21,000-$30,500 Washington 0.6 $6,000-$8,700 Morton-Lillis 2 1 $21 000-$30 500 Morton-Lillis 2.1 $21,000-$30,500 Crawford 1.4 $14,000-$20,300 Park 1.4 $14,000-$20,300 Stafford-Loy Lake 1.3 $13,000-$18,900 Waterloo Lake 0 6 $6 000 $8 700 Waterloo Lake 0.6 $6,000-$8,700 Loy Lake-Bullock-Brock 2.0 $20,000-$29,000 Maurice 1.0 $10,000-$14,500 Scullin 0.9 $9,000-$13,100 Chandler 1 8 $18 000 $26 100 Chandler 1.8 $18,000-$26,100 Burnett 0.6 $6,000-$8,700 Crockett 0.9 $9,000-$13,100 Johnson 1.9 $19,000-$27,600 Sears 1 6 $16 000 $23 200 Sears 1.6 $16,000-$23,200 Woodard-Houston 1.4 $14,000-$20,300 Gandy-Fairbanks 0.4 $4,000-$5,800 Verna-Day-Munson 2.6 $26,000-$37,700 Heron 1 1 $11 000 $16 000 Heron 1.1 $11,000-$16,000 Coffin 1.2 $12,000-$17,400
Totals 26.9 $438,700-636,100
Class III Bikeways – Sherman Bike Routes and Wayfinding
Location Miles Estimate of Potential Cost / Range
Teresa-Texoma-Frisco 5.8 $58,000-$84,100 $ $ Main 0.7 $7,000-$10,200 Lamberth 2.9 $29,000-$42,100 Ricketts 1.8 $18,000-$26,100 Ricketts 1.8 $18,000 $26,100 Burton-Wood 0.3 $3,000-$4,400 Rex Cruse 0.2 $2,000-$2,900 Washington 1.8 $18,000-$26,100 Brockett 1.1 $11,000-$16,000 P 0 2 $2 000 $2 900 Pecan 0.2 $2,000-$2,900 King-Crockett 1.6 $16,000-$23,200 Thomas 0.6 $6,000-$8,700 $ , $ , 13.9 ??
Bicycle Road Safety Audit Guidelines Bicycle Road Safety Audit Guidelines d P t Li t d P t Li t and Prompt Lists and Prompt Lists
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/tools_solve/fhwasa12018/fhwasa12018.pdf