SLIDE 1
sharps injuries in the hospital and health care sector Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
sharps injuries in the hospital and health care sector Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Implementation of Directive 2010/32/EU on prevention of sharps injuries in the hospital and health care sector Presentation to Regional Seminar, 31 st January 2013, Dublin Significance of issue of sharps injuries ( source: GHK survey , 2011 ) 8
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Is there data on number of sharps injuries (source: GHK survey ,
2011)
14 Total responses to date (31 January 2013) 8 Trade union (CY, ES, NL, SE, SF, UK, Belarus) 6 Employer (DK, LV, NL, SE, SF, UK)
SLIDE 4
Responses received to survey
14 Total responses to date (31 January 2013) 8 Trade union (CY, ES, NL, SE, SF, UK, Belarus) 6 Employer (DK, LV, NL, SE, SF, UK)
SLIDE 5
Status of transposition
Transposition completed: 3 countries (NL, SE, (Belarus)) Transposition prior to May 2013: DK, LV Transposition likely by deadline: SF, UK No clear date given: CY, EE, ES Progress towards transpositi
- n of
legislation (deadline May 2013)...
SLIDE 6
Is new legislation required to transpose Directive in your country? (source: GHK survey , 2011)
14 Total responses to date (31 January 2013) 8 Trade union (CY, ES, NL, SE, SF, UK, Belarus) 6 Employer (DK, LV, NL, SE, SF, UK)
SLIDE 7
How will the legislation be implemented? (source: GHK survey ,
2011)
14 Total responses to date (31 January 2013) 8 Trade union (CY, ES, NL, SE, SF, UK, Belarus) 6 Employer (DK, LV, NL, SE, SF, UK)
SLIDE 8
Nature of transposition
Legislation only: CY, DK, ES, SE, SF, UK Legislation and collective agreement: Belarus, Latvia Collective agreement Other method of transposition: NL (Incorporated in existing Guideline) Directive likely to be transposed as...
SLIDE 9
Level of change required to existing legislation
None Low Moderate Significant Denmark Netherlands Finland (employers) Belarus Estonia Latvia Spain Sweden UK (trade unions, nurses) Finland (trade unions) UK (trade unions)
SLIDE 10
Challenges for implementation
CBA Intervention logic Questions Main elements for data collection
Yes (LV, SF, UK) Fear of cost of implementation in combination with existing budgetary pressures Insufficient commitment to full transposition by legislator/other stakeholders
No (CY, EE, ES, DK, NL. Belarus)
Do you foresee any challenges for implemen- tation?
Main methodological elements
SLIDE 11
Who was responsible – who was involved?
Responsible Involved No involved Ministry of Health Ministry of Employment and Social Affairs Agency of Government Ministry of Health Ministry of Labour Social partners (cross-industry) Social partners (sectoral) Ministry of Health (UK) Nursing
- rganisation
(Latvia) Healthcare branches other than hospitals (NL)
SLIDE 12
Existence of current guidance/tools
All that answered no have plans to develop such guidance, with exception of CY Yes: Belarus, ES, NL (employer), SE, SF (employer) UK No: CY, LV, NL (trade union), SF (trade union)
SLIDE 13
Main lessons 2012 Agenda Dealing with LTU Questions Overview of new phase of MLP Questions
Questions?
SLIDE 14