(Shareholder) Disputes in the United States Orestis Omran, Esq. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

shareholder disputes
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

(Shareholder) Disputes in the United States Orestis Omran, Esq. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the United States Orestis Omran, Esq. Counsel, DLA Piper Definition of "mediation" Article 1 of the 2002 UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation : a process


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the United States

Orestis Omran, Esq. Counsel, DLA Piper

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Definition of "mediation"

  • Article 1 of the 2002 UNCITRAL Model Law on International

Commercial Conciliation : “a process … whereby parties request a third person or persons … to assist them in their attempt to reach an amicable settlement

  • f their dispute arising out of or relating to a contractual or other

legal relationship. The conciliator does not have the authority to impose upon the parties a solution to the dispute.”

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why mediation ?

  • Cost
  • Speed
  • Quality
  • Predictability
  • Control
  • Flexibility
  • Confidentiality
  • Limited risk
  • No admission of liability
  • Voluntary character
  • Non-binding yet enforceable agreement

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Mediation v. Litigation

  • flexible approach
  • unforeseen creative solution
  • non- adversarial approach
  • more objective and detached mirror

reality check

  • more reliable risk management technique

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Mediation in the US: The framework

  • UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules
  • ICC Mediation Rules 2014
  • International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR) - CPR

Mediation Procedure

  • US Constitution (Due Process) Federal laws-rules of Civil Procedure/ Common

Law Jurisprudence

  • 28 U.S. Code Chapter 44: ADR Program per District Court
  • Uniform Mediation Act (Last Revised in 2003) (drafted by the National

Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in collaboration with the ABA's Section on Dispute Resolution)

  • State legislation (eg. California Code of Civil procedure) – California, Florida,

Ohio and (less) Texas taking the lead on shaping US corporate mediation

  • See also Delaware Court of Chancery ADR Program

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Types of Corporate Governance Disputes

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 6

:

  • conflicts of interest by board members or executives; the appointment of

board members/executives

  • remuneration/bonuses to board members; discharging individual board

members/ executives; share valuation (issue of new shares or bonds or squeeze out)

  • the terms of a proposed takeover
  • acquisition or disposal of company assets
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Mediation Stages in Shareholder Disputes

  • Mediator Appointment
  • Preparation
  • Negotiation
  • Concluding phase (parties formalize

agreement)

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Appointment

  • Internal Shareholders Disputes- Who to appoint:

– Chairmen or other board members – CEOs – Senior officers – Appointment of a corporate governance ombudsman

08/11/2017 Mediation iofCorporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Conduct

  • Informal Mediation or Facilitation – controlled forum – eg.

facilitation of a board retreat or strategy meeting

  • Formal Mediation or Conciliation - focused solely on

process – eg. mediation of a dispute between the board and dissident shareholders

  • Formal Mediation or Early Neutral Evaluation –

encouragement to agree by use of legal knowledge – ie dispute

  • ver the value of shares in a squeeze-out procedure

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Enforcement of Mediation Settlement Agreements in the US

  • Enforcement in the US (contract, settlement agreement, per se

judicial enforcement) – In need for a new uniform framework?

  • International commercial conciliation: preparation of an

international instrument on enforcement of international commercial settlement agreements ?(UNCITRAL Working Group II – Dispute Settlement Feb. 2017)

)

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CASE STUDY 1: PHOENIX TIMBER CORPORATION (1985)

  • Dissident shareholders wishing to appoint 3 new

independent board members

  • CEO: Keep Board intact
  • Majority prevailed BUT: poor corporate

performance and resignation of several directors, including the Chairman

  • Result: substantial losses for that year

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CASE STUDY 2: The New York Times (2008)

  • Investment Funds – dissident shareholders (19%): elect 4 new

directors but not eliminate two tier share structure allowing management to be kept by family owner

  • Board meeting with dissident shareholders Resolution:

minority appoints 2 new directors

  • Take away: should be part of corporate policies to hold regular

discussions with all major shareholders  solutions before disputes escalate into proxy fights

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CASE STUDY 3: HEWLETT-PACKARD (2002)

  • Shareholder dispute over Merger with Compaq: All Board

members FOR but Walter Hewlett (son of co-founder was against) + Packard family (jointly 18%) AGAINST

  • War to prevail: Letters to shareholders by both sides –

campaign to diminish opposing view

  • Result: Non- appointment of Walter Hewlett to the Board
  • f the merged company + expensive law suits
  • Take-away for M&A: potential costly disputes/companies

end up losing the link with their roots

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The Next Level: Self-Compliance Mediation Programs

  • US Companies successfully implementing in-house corporate

mediation programs :

  • Toro Co. (in house ADR program -50% in settlement costs
  • Wells Fargo ( all-in Comprehensive DR Program)
  • U.S. Postal Service (REDRESS Program for Employment

Disputes)

  • Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2 mediators to assist trila

team)

  • American Express (.
  • Exploring ADR before litigation: Increasingly some of the largest

companies in the US – including Time Warner, UPS, General Electric, the Prudential and Coca-Cola

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CONCLUSIONS

  • No unified concrete legal framework across the US
  • Mediation: Efficiency and Cost-Management
  • Importance on resolving corporate (shareholders)

disputes

  • The new era: Mediation as the major tool to

resolve corporate disputes

08/11/2017 Mediation of Corporate (Shareholder) Disputes in the US 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

08/11/2017 16