Sex-biased movement of Atlantic halibut on Scotian Shelf and southern Grand Banks
…but first, why we are interested in that…
Nell den Heyer, K. Ransier and N.L. Shackell Fisheries and Oceans, Canada IFS Nov 2017
1
Sex-biased movement of Atlantic halibut on Scotian Shelf and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Sex-biased movement of Atlantic halibut on Scotian Shelf and southern Grand Banks but first, why we are interested in that Nell den Heyer , K. Ransier and N.L. Shackell Fisheries and Oceans, Canada IFS Nov 2017 1 Large, long-lived
Nell den Heyer, K. Ransier and N.L. Shackell Fisheries and Oceans, Canada IFS Nov 2017
1
2
Age (years) 50 40 30 20 10 250 200 150 100 50
Both gears Linf = 132 K = 0.20 T0 = 1.1 R2 = 0.49 n = 892 Age (years) 40 30 20 10 250 200 150 100 50 Both gears Linf = 206 K = 0.10 T0 = 0.12 R2 = 0.69 n = 1343
From Armsworthy and Campana 2010
3L 5Y
Newfoundland Overseas France
Both are experiencing a period of high juvenile recruitment3
1970 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 2006 2012 5 10 15 20 25 30
Total Legal Spawning
Year
Biomass, 1000t
2015 Value of Commercial Groundfish Atlantic Canada = $216 Million
Greenland halibut Atlantic halibut Haddock Atlantic Cod Redfish spp. Flatfishes Other
2015 Value of Commercial Groundfish Canada = $362 Million
Greenland halibut Atantic halibut Pacific halibut Flatfishes Redfish spp. Haddock Cod Other
Halibut survey biomass index
4
5
6
http://www.photolib.noaa.gov/700s/figb0010.jpg
Commercial
fresh fish on ice
1836L overfished By 1850 L overfished
…not so heavily fished
1880= L Collapse
under Treaty of Paris (1783) By 1850 L overfished US fishermen predominate. Canadians not in until 1900s Train system improves in early 1800s providing easier access to Ice
50s and 60s: tagging 80s: maturity, tagging, yield model è management units, TAC and min size 1998 –present: Industry-DFO halibut longline survey 2003-2007: growth and age-length key 2006-present: conventional tagging 2007,2009,2011&12: PSAT tagging 2010: first age-structured length based assessment model 2014: new assessment framework with MSE approach 2015-present: Spatial ecology 2017-present: Genetics 2017: New Stratified Random Survey
from Trumble et al. 1993
7
(Nancy Shackell, Nell den Heyer, Kiyomi French/DFO, Canada) Connectivity Current=2000km; Estimated=250km Partial Migration of Mature female R residents: 29 km
Winter Migration: <200km
Size of Juvenile Habitat ~ Adult landings
Q: Are the following consistent with current stock unit domain?
Life history trait A: No… how can this contribute to sustaining stock?
? Range expansion/secondary role of closed areas Genetic landscape (in progress) MSE by spatial units
8
9
Mature males: 80cm+ Mature females: 103cm+ (4X), 119cm+(3NOPS4VW) Summer: April to August Winter: September to March
11
§ Over 4500 halibut tagged since 2006 § Double tagged to estimate tag loss § During halibut longline survey in May-July § Tag allocation by NAFO area proportional to abundance § All sizes – fishermen compensated for release of legal fish § Rewards for returns – AHC $100 reward per fish (with one or
12
13
N=4559
n=811 n male = 261 n female = 302 n=4559 n=811 n male = 261 n female = 302
14
15
16
17
ü For juveniles no difference by sex or season ü Mature females different in winter and summer ü Mature males different from mature females in summer and mature females in winter ü Mature males not different from juveniles
Summer Winter Immature
18
Mean squared displacement, km2 Time between release and recapture, by quarter Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
19
20
21
Median = 5.9 km, mean= 42km
22
Median =80 km, mean= 125 km
23
From Armsworthy et al. 2014
24
25
26
ØHigh proportion of halibut are resident, with some being caught up to
ØLarge females are more likely to be recaptured within 20km of release
ØIn winter, large females more likely to move than all other halibut ØSouthern Grand Banks and Gully are potential areas for spawning ØJuveniles are more likely to move the greatest distances ØMovement of juveniles and adult males are consistent with diffusion ØLargest movements along the coast are predominantly from east to
27
28
Chapman et al. 2011
Release Recovery (%) n 0B 3N 3O 3P 4Vn 4Vs 4W 4X 5Y Males 3N 14 29 64 7 3O 13 8 62 15 8 8 3P 46 13 67 2 9 4 4 4Vn 8 88 13 4Vs 33 9 70 21 4W 43 14 14 63 9 4X 28 4 7 29 61 Females 3N 56 29 66 5 3O 26 4 73 19 4 3P 53 2 2 85 9 2 4Vn 3 33 67 4Vs 38 11 68 21 4W 28 14 7 14 61 4 4X 29 7 10 7 14 55 7
29
Adapted from http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/scientificUpdate/2013/researchProgram/EvolutionandEcology/EvolutionaryConsumption.html
…all of this affects all of that->
30