Senior Corps Tuesday Talk:
Senior Corps Volunteer Research Synthesis
August 15, 2017 3:30pm ET
Senior Corps Tuesday Talk: Senior Corps Volunteer Research Synthesis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Senior Corps Tuesday Talk: Senior Corps Volunteer Research Synthesis August 15, 2017 3:30pm ET Housekeeping All lines on mute This session is being recorded Audio problems? Try calling in. Video problems? Try disconnecting and
August 15, 2017 3:30pm ET
the average Senior Corps volunteer.
Corps volunteer to serve.
and wellbeing of the average Senior Corps volunteer.
Grandparents and Senior Companions (2014)
Evaluation of RSVP Volunteers (2015)
Impact of Service on Volunteers and Beneficiaries (ongoing)
Volunteer Demographics Data
Designed by Freepik
Senior Corps volunteers by state
New York, California, Florida, Texas, Michigan and Pennsylvania highest percentages of Senior Corp Volunteers among the 50 States and Territories have the
Current concentration of seniors by state
Growth in number of seniors by state
Age
Average age of a Senior Corps volunteer is 73 younger (appx. 66). ; however, median age is
Average Age of Senior Corps Volunteers
71.809 71.82 74.13
70 71 72 73 74 75
SCP FGP RSVP
Age in years
Average Volunteer Age By Program SCP/FGP All Volunteers versus New Volunteers
71.8 66.1 71.8 66.0 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 Full Program New Members
SCP FGP
All volunteers New volunteers
Gender
Across Senior Corps volunteers are overwhelmingly female.
Gender Participation By Program
16 9 26 84 91 74
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
SCP FGP RSVP Percent
Male Female
Race
Significant differences can be seen comparing FGP/SCP to RSVP.
Race Distribution by Program
45 45 87 41 38 4 2 2 1 3 3 3 4 6 6 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
FGP SCP RSVP Percentage White AFAM AIAK ASPI Other
Ethnicity
These differences carry through when looking at Hispanic/non Hispanic percentages.
14.9 12.6 3.1 81.9 84.5 96.9 3.2 2.9 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
SCP FGP RSVP Percentage Hispanic Not Hispanic Don't Know
Ethnicity
More highly educated volunteers trend toward RSVP as opposed to FGP and SCP.
Percent of Education Level by Program
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSVP FGP SCP Percentage
Education Levels By Program SCP/FGP All Volunteers versus New Volunteers
26.1 31.6 24.0 13.6 10.7 30.7 41.4 17.3 21.3 36.4 25.6 12.3 13.3 29.1 44.0 13.6 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Less Than HS HS Diploma Some College BA or Higher Less Than HS HS Diploma Some College BA or Higher Full Program New Member Percentage
SCP FGP
All volunteers New volunteers
Volunteer Motivations Data
Designed by Freepik
Motivation To Volunteer
Percentage
12 4 5
Not at all A little Somewhat A lot A great deal
7 6 8 11
17 6 3 5 8 7 8 3 3 9 4 37 19 15 18 28 20 24 14 16 28 30 16 32 34 29 29 29 27 29 31 25 66 17 40 46 40 29 40 33 52 49 27
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
The most frequent ways volunteers learned about service opportunities were:
FGP more likely “From a friend”; SCP more likely “Word of mouth”
Volunteer Psycho-Social Data
Life Satisfaction
FGP and SCP show strong similarities across most measures.
Satisfied With Life as a Whole
.5 1.7 19.7 45.2 33.0 .4 1.6 18.6 45.6 33.6 .0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0
Not at all satisfied Not very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Very satisfied Completely Satisfied SCP FGP Percentage
Life Satisfaction cont.
Life Satisfaction By Program
20 19 38 35 45 46 37 44 33 34 17 15 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
SCP FGP SCP FGP Cross-Sectional- All Volunteers Longitudinal Baseline- New Volunteers
Percentage
Not at all satisfied Not very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Very satisfied Completely Satisfied
Health Status
Self Reported Health Status
1 17 43 31 9 1 16 43 31 9 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent SCP FGP Percentage
Health Status cont.
Self Rated Health By Program
17 16 21 13 43 43 44 47 31 31 25 32 9 9 10 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
SCP FGP SCP FGP Cross-Sectional- All Volunteers Longitudinal Baseline- New Volunteers
Percentage
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent
Connectivity
Again we see the gap between RSVP and SCP/FGP over several measures.
There Are People You Feel Close To
2 29 69 2 27 71 4 15 80 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Hardly ever or never Some of the time Often SCP FGP RSVP Percentage
Companionship
Feel That You Lack Companionship
47 42 11 46 44 10 71 22 8 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Hardly ever or never Some of the time Often SCP FGP Percentage
Self-Efficacy
Can do the things that I want to do
6 8 6 11 31 38 7 8 6 11 31 38 2 2 2 6 24 64 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Strongly disagree Somewhat disagree Slightly disagree Slightly agree Somewhat agree or Strongly agree SCP FGP RSVP Percentage
Highlights from FGP/SCP Longitudinal Study After one year of service with FGP/SCP:
wellbeing
– More than one third who began in “good” health reported improvements
isolation
– 67% who began “often” lacking companionship reported improvements
– 63% who began with three or four symptoms reported fewer – 70% who began with five or more symptoms reported fewer