semiclassical estimates for non selfadjoint operators
play

Semiclassical estimates for non-selfadjoint operators with double - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Semiclassical estimates for non-selfadjoint operators with double characteristics Michael Hitrik Department of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles Joint work with Karel Pravda-Starov M. Hitrik (UCLA) 1 / 24 Introduction The


  1. Semiclassical estimates for non-selfadjoint operators with double characteristics Michael Hitrik Department of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles Joint work with Karel Pravda-Starov M. Hitrik (UCLA) 1 / 24

  2. Introduction The study of operators with double characteristics has a long tradition in the analysis of linear PDE. Boutet de Monvel, Grigis, Helffer, H¨ ormander, Ivrii, Petkov, Sj¨ ostrand... (classical works on hypoellipticity from the 1970’s). Recent works on Kramers–Fokker–Planck type operators have brought about a renewed interest in this subject. H´ erau – Nier, Helffer – Nier, H´ erau – Sj¨ ostrand – Stolk (2004 – 2006). In a recent work with K. Pravda–Starov we have investigated spectral and semigroup properties for a class of non-selfadjoint quadratic operators that are also non-elliptic. M. Hitrik (UCLA) 2 / 24

  3. Specifically, let q : T ∗ R n → C be a quadratic form such that Re q ( x , ξ ) ≥ 0, ( x , ξ ) ∈ T ∗ R n . Associated to q is the Hamilton map F : T ∗ C n → T ∗ C n defined by X , Y ∈ T ∗ C n , q ( X , Y ) = σ ( X , FY ) , where σ is the canonical symplectic form on T ∗ R n . M. Hitrik (UCLA) 3 / 24

  4. It turns out that in order to understand the quadratic operator Q = q w ( x , D x ) , defined as the Weyl quantization of q , it is both helpful and natural to introduce the singular space S defined as follows :   � Re F ( Im F ) j � ∞ �   ∩ R 2 n . S = Ker j =0 Notice that Re F ( S ) = { 0 } and ( Im F ) S ⊂ S . M. Hitrik (UCLA) 4 / 24

  5. Example. The one-dimensional quadratic Kramers–Fokker–Planck operator is given by K = q w ( x , y , D x , D y ) − 1 , where q ( x , y , ξ, η ) = η 2 + y 2 + i ( y ξ − ax η ) , a ∈ R \{ 0 } . (1.1) In this case, S = Ker ( Re F ) ∩ Ker ( Re F Im F ) ∩ R 4 = { 0 } . M. Hitrik (UCLA) 5 / 24

  6. Theorem (Pravda-Starov – H., 2008). Assume that the quadratic form q is such that Re q ≥ 0 and that the restriction of q to S is elliptic , X ∈ S , q ( X ) = 0 ⇒ X = 0 . Then the singular space S is symplectic and the spectrum of q w ( x , D x ) on L 2 is discrete. The eigenvalues are of the form � � � r λ + 2 k λ ( − i λ ) , k λ ∈ N , λ ∈ Spec ( F ) , − i λ ∈ C + ∪ (Σ( q | S ) \{ 0 } ) where r λ is the dimension of the space of generalized eigenvectors of F in T ∗ C n associated to the eigenvalue λ ∈ C , Σ( q | S ) = q ( S ) and C + = { z ∈ C ; Re z > 0 } . M. Hitrik (UCLA) 6 / 24

  7. Remarks . The structure of the spectrum of q w ( x , D x ) in the globally elliptic case is known since the work of J. Sj¨ ostrand (1974). In the quadratic Kramers–Fokker–Planck case, this result is known (Helffer – Nier, H´ erau – Sj¨ ostrand – Stolk, Risken). This talk : work in progress on non-selfadjoint semiclassical operators with double characteristics, when the quadratic approximations at doubly characteristic points are merely partially elliptic along the singular space. M. Hitrik (UCLA) 7 / 24

  8. In addition to the classical PDE works, our main source of inspiration is the work by H´ erau – Sj¨ ostrand – Stolk (2004) and also the recent work by H´ erau – Sj¨ ostrand – H. (2007) on second order differential operators of Kramers–Fokker–Planck type. M. Hitrik (UCLA) 8 / 24

  9. Statement of the results Let m ≥ 1 be an order function on R 2 n , satisfying for some C 0 > 0, N 0 > 0, m ( X ) ≤ C 0 � X − Y � N 0 m ( Y ) , X , Y ∈ R 2 n . Associated to m is the symbol space S ( m ) defined by a ∈ S ( m ) ⇔ ∂ α a ( X ) = O α (1) m ( x ) , α ∈ N 2 n . Let P ( x , ξ ; h ) ∼ p ( x , ξ ) + hp 1 ( x , ξ ) + . . . in S ( m ) be such that X = ( x , ξ ) ∈ R 2 n . Re p ( X ) ≥ 0 , M. Hitrik (UCLA) 9 / 24

  10. Assume that for some C > 0, Re p ( X ) ≥ m ( X ) , | X | ≥ C . C For h > 0 small enough, we introduce the h – Weyl quantization of P ( x , ξ ; h ), P = P w ( x , hD x ; h ) . The spectrum of P in a fixed neighborhood of 0 ∈ C is discrete. Assume that the set { X ∈ R 2 n ; Re p ( X ) = 0 } is finite = { X 1 , . . . X N } . M. Hitrik (UCLA) 10 / 24

  11. Then necessarily � ( X − X j ) 2 � Re p ( X ) = O , X → X j , 1 ≤ j ≤ N , and assume that the same holds for Im p , � ( X − X j ) 2 � Im p ( X ) = O , X → X j , 1 ≤ j ≤ N . Write p ( X j + Y ) = q j ( Y ) + O ( Y 3 ) , Y → 0 , where q j is quadratic with Re q j ≥ 0. Let S j stand for the singular space of q j , 1 ≤ j ≤ N . M. Hitrik (UCLA) 11 / 24

  12. Theorem (Pravda-Starov – H., 2008) Assume that q j is elliptic along S j , for each 1 ≤ j ≤ N, X ∈ S j , q j ( X ) = 0 ⇒ X = 0 . Then for each B > 1 and for every fixed neighborhood Ω ⊂ C of N � � � p 1 ( X j ) + Spec ( q w j ( x , D x )) j =1 there exists h 0 > 0 and C > 0 such that for | z | ≤ B, z / ∈ Ω , and h ∈ (0 , h 0 ] , we have || ( P − hz ) u || L 2 ≥ h u ∈ S ( R n ) . C || u || L 2 , M. Hitrik (UCLA) 12 / 24

  13. Remarks . We get the same estimate as in the quadratic case, when P = q w ( x , hD x ), with q quadratic, elliptic along S . In the case when q j are globally elliptic, 1 ≤ j ≤ N , this result is essentially well-known (J. Sj¨ ostrand). For Kramers–Fokker–Planck type operators, this result was established by H´ erau – Sj¨ ostrand – Stolk. For m = 1, say, the result implies that for z ∈ C with | z | ≤ B as in the theorem, � 1 � ( P − hz ) − 1 = O : L 2 → L 2 . h Following the methods of H´ erau – Sj¨ ostrand – Stolk, one can go further and compute Spec ( P ) for | z | < Bh , modulo O ( h ∞ ). M. Hitrik (UCLA) 13 / 24

  14. Example. Let q = q ( x ′ , ξ ′ ) be the quadratic form defined in (1.1) and let q ( x ′′ , ξ ′′ ) be a real-valued elliptic quadratic form in another group of � q = � symplectic variables ( x ′′ , ξ ′′ ). Then the quadratic form Q ( x ′ , x ′′ , ξ ′ , ξ ′′ ) = q ( x ′ , ξ ′ ) + i � q ( x ′′ , ξ ′′ ) is elliptic along the associated singular space S = { ( x ′ , x ′′ , ξ ′ , ξ ′′ ); x ′ = ξ ′ = 0 } . M. Hitrik (UCLA) 14 / 24

  15. Ideas of the proof Take m = 1 and assume for simplicity that N = 1 and that X 1 = (0 , 0) ∈ T ∗ R n . Write p ( X ) = q ( X ) + O ( X 3 ) , X → 0 , where q is elliptic when restricted to S . It follows then that S is symplectic. We have the F – invariant decomposition T ∗ R n = S σ ⊕ S , with linear symplectic coordinates ( x ′ , ξ ′ ) ∈ S σ , ( x ′′ , ξ ′′ ) ∈ S , so that q ( x , ξ ) = q 1 ( x ′ , ξ ′ ) + iq 2 ( x ′′ , ξ ′′ ) , X = ( x , ξ ) = ( x ′ , x ′′ , ξ ′ , ξ ′′ ) . M. Hitrik (UCLA) 15 / 24

  16. Here q 2 is elliptic and real-valued. The quadratic form q 1 enjoys the following dynamical property : for each T > 0, � T 1 Re q 1 ◦ exp( tH Im q 1 ) dt > 0 . T 0 It follows that the flow average � T � Re p � T , Im p = 1 Re p ◦ exp( tH Im p ) dt T 0 satisfies q ( x ′ , ξ ′ ) + O ( X 3 ) , � Re p � T , Im p ( X ) = � where the quadratic form q ( x ′ , ξ ′ ) > 0 . � M. Hitrik (UCLA) 16 / 24

  17. We shall introduce a weight corresponding to the procedure of averaging along the H Im p – flow in a small neighborhood of 0. Let g ∈ C ∞ ([0 , ∞ ); [0 , 1]) be decreasing and such that g ( t ) = t − 1 , g ( t ) = 1 , t ∈ [0 , 1] , t ≥ 2 . Let � � | X | 2 ( Re p ) ε ( X ) = g Re p ( X ) , ε > 0 . ε Then ( Re p ) ε ( X ) = O ( ε ) . M. Hitrik (UCLA) 17 / 24

  18. Set, for T > 0 � � � − t G ε = − J ( Re p ) ε ◦ exp( tH Im p ) dt . T Here J is the compactly supported piecewise affine function solving J ′ ( t ) = δ ( t ) − 1 [ − 1 , 0] ( t ) . Then G ε = O ( ε ) satisfies H Im p G ε = � ( Re p ) ε � T , Im p − ( Re p ) ε M. Hitrik (UCLA) 18 / 24

  19. Associated to G ε we have the IR–manifold Λ δ,ε = { X + i δ H G ε ( X ); X ∈ T ∗ R n } , 0 < δ ≪ 1 . The distorted symbol p | Λ δ,ε = p ( X + i δ H G ε ( X )) satisfies � � = Re p + δ H Im p G ε + O ( δ 2 |∇ G ε | 2 ) , Re p | Λ δ,ε and � � p | Λ δ,ε = Im p + O ( δ |∇ G ε | ) . Im M. Hitrik (UCLA) 19 / 24

  20. Using the ellipticity of � � S σ Re p | Λ δ,ε along and the ellipticity of � � Im p | Λ δ,ε along S , we obtain that for X ∈ T ∗ R n in a small but fixed neighborhood of 0, � � | p ( X + i δ H G ε ( X )) | ≥ δ | X | 2 , ε C min , C > 1 , M. Hitrik (UCLA) 20 / 24

  21. for δ ∈ (0 , δ 0 ] and ε ∈ (0 , ε 0 ], with δ 0 > 0 and ε 0 > 0 sufficiently small. More precisely, in the entire region | X | ≥ √ ε , we have for some C > 1, �� � � δε ≥ δε Re 1 − p ( X + i δ H G ε ( X )) C . C | X | 2 M. Hitrik (UCLA) 21 / 24

  22. Associated to Λ δ,ε is the Hilbert space H (Λ δ,ε ) of functions that are microlocally � � G ε �� O exp h in the L 2 –sense. We shall take ε = Ah , where A is a constant. Then we have || · || H (Λ δ,ε ) ∼ || · || L 2 , uniformly as h → 0, for each fixed A > 1. M. Hitrik (UCLA) 22 / 24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend