Self-service Training slides Part 1 of 2 Overview Structure of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Self-service Training slides Part 1 of 2 Overview Structure of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Self-service Training slides Part 1 of 2 Overview Structure of tool/scoring system Scoring guidelines Completion of NPTDA Computer outputs Publications 2 adult versions physical & cognitive Designed for use
Overview Structure of tool/scoring system Scoring guidelines Completion of NPTDA Computer outputs Publications
2 adult versions – physical & cognitive Designed for use in specialist neuro-rehabilitation settings Relevant to high intensity rehabilitation NPTDA is measure of therapy intervention (not activity analysis) Reflects therapy intervention for individual patients UK ROC software required for conversion to therapy time Part of the parallel dataset for Level 1 & 2 services
6 domains
- A. physical/handling programme
- B. Basic functions
- C. Activities of daily living
- D. Cognitive/psychosocial/family support
- E. Preparing for discharge
- F. Additional activities
Groups/clinics Tick box items (dichotomous variables) for 6 areas
- Special facilities
- Medical investigation
- Medical procedures
- Specialist equipment hire
- Basic special equipment
- Highly specialist equipment
27 ordinal items
- 23 items scored between 0-4
- 4 items scored between 0-2
Each item allocated a “lead discipline”
- Therapy time assigned to lead discipline
- Lead discipline can be changed
Total ordinal score 0-100 6 tick box items – no scores assigned
Scores for each item
None No intervention 1 Low Minimal intervention 2 Medium Standard intervention 3 High Intensive intervention 3.5 Interdisciplinary Interdisciplinary intervention 4 Complex Very high intensity by ≥1 disciplines
Score
- re
Level el Descr escripti tion
- n
None No inte terv rvent ntion
- n
- Intervention not relevant or
- No planned therapy at the current time
1 Low Mini nimal mal interv tervent ention
- n or Revie
iew w only ly (<1 hour per week) e.g.
- Single short intervention or
- Brief checks only
2 Medium Stand ndard rd inte terv rvent ntion
- n requiring sin
ingl gle e thera erapis ist t or assi sista tant nt only ly e.g.
- Detailed assessment possibly in several sessions or
- r
- Standard intervention by a single therapist or
- r
- More frequent intervention, but by an assistant only
3 High Inten tensi sive inte terv rvent ntion
- n requiring additi
tiona nal time me or extra ra pair ir of skil illed ed hand nds s e.g.
- Increased frequency or duration of session from a skilled therapist or
- r
- Combined input from therapist and assistant (some sessions)or
- r
- Two qualified therapists for 1-2 sessions
3.5 ID Occa ccasional ional inte ter-disc scipli lina nary (ID) inte terv rvent ntion
- n (normally ≤4hours)
- One-off or occasional inter-disciplinary session/intervention
4 Complex Comple lex x inte terv rvent ntion
- n requiring regul
gular r ID inte terv rvent ntion
- n or at very
ry high gh inte tens nsity ty
(total >4 hours/week) e.g.
- Two or more disciplines working in close co-ordination i.e usually together in
the same session or in very close collaboration with regularly debriefing/ discussion or
- r
- Combined input from therapist and assistant (all sessions)or
- r
- Two qualified therapists from the same discipline for ≥3 sessions or
- r
- Very intensive intervention from a single therapist
Complete tool retrospectively based on previous fortnightly
intervention – based on what they got
All items must be scored Lead discipline can be changed as necessary (cross out current lead
discipline and enter correct discipline)
Most items will be scored from 0-3
- Time spent does not need recording as automated in computer software
Interdisciplinary items score 3.5
- Time spent by each discipline needs to be entered (average therapy time spent
during fortnight)
Multi-disciplinary or complex intervention may score 4
- Time spent needs recording (average time spent during fortnight - items 1-20 & 23)
- Item 21 community/home visits records total hours and not average
The NPTDA is completed fortnightly to reduce therapy
burden in completion
It is acknowledged that therapy intervention can vary
from week to week therefore scores are based on the
- verall intervention of the fortnight
Where inter-disciplinary or very complex (excessive
time) intervention occurs requiring scores of 3.5 or 4 the time spent is averaged.
- For example: An SLT spent 2 hours on week 1 and 3 hours on
week 2 with tracheostomy management (total 5 hours – average = 2.5) whilst the physio spent 4 hours on both weeks (total 8 hours, average 4 hours). SLT documents 2.5 hours and Physio 4 hours giving a combined total of 6.5 hours so allocates a score of 4
Rules for scoring NPTDA differ in certain areas of the tool.
Most are scored from 0-3 based on level of therapy intervention and time does not need to be considered.
Interdisciplinary intervention scores 3.5 or 4 depending on
time in therapy
Complex intervention scores 4 if excessive hours required. Differences to these rules includes:
- Item 21 – insert total hours for community visit not average (normally only
- ccurs during 1 week – software will compute average time)
- Item 23 & 24 – insert total hours for meetings and reports. Score 1 if
total hours are 1 or less. Score 2 if greater than 1 hour (there is no score of 3, 3.5 or 4 for these items) (software will compute average time)
- Item 25 – score 1 if attends 1 group, score 2 if attends 2+ groups
(there is no score of 3, 3.5 or 4 for this item)
- Item 26 – describe clinic, time, number of disciplines. Score 1 if 1 hour
- r less, score 2 if more than 1 hour (there is no score of 3, 3.5 or 4 for
this items)
Assessment can be completed at a team meeting
- r
the paper score sheet can be stored in one location
that individual disciplines can access and
- enter scores for the items their discipline “leads” on
- Enter time for items their discipline was involved in but does not
lead on
Direct face-to-face contact needs to be included along
with patient related preparation.
- For example: The Speech Therapist spends1 hour one week preparing a
communication booklet for patient A (patient related but not face-to-face) and then has a 4 x half hour sessions (=2hours) with patient A the following week to explain/practice using it (face-to-face session). Both these interventions need to be included when scoring Speech and language therapy. Score 2 – Medium Intervention
Therapy intervention may span several items on
the tool – do not double count – score based on the main purpose of the intervention
- For example: The Occupational Therapist has a 1 hour
session each week with patient A to practice washing &
- dressing. During the sessions the OT needs to use the
communication & behavioural strategies suggested by SLT and psychology and the mode of mobility identified by physio for getting to the washroom. Score 2: Washing and dressing only – Medium intervention (Do not include the
mobility, communication or behavioural strategies)
All items (except Medical management) may be
completed by more than 1 discipline during the fortnightly reporting period.
- Each discipline involved needs to enter the average time spent
during the fortnightly reporting period. Once all disciplines involved have entered their time then the overall score can be entered.
- The score will be either 3.5 or 4 depending on the total therapy
- time. For most items therapy time of 4 hours or less will be a
score of 3.5 and more than 4 hours a score of 4.
- There are anomalies to this rule - these are explained in the
next 2 slides.
Scores of 3.5
- 2 or more therapy disciplines must have provided therapy input for the
item during the fortnightly reporting period
- This can be at a joint therapy session or
- Non-joint session but active therapy intervention for a specific item by
more than 1 discipline during the same fortnightly reporting period
- Total therapy time is 4 hours or less (see next slide for anomalies to this rule)
Scores of 4
- Can be interdisciplinary or complex intervention for 1 discipline
- Total therapy time is greater than 4 hours (see next slide for anomalies to this rule)
For most items a score of 4 is allocated if the average
fortnightly therapy hours exceeds 4 hours. However, there are some anomalies to the rule as follows:
Score 4 if average hours exceed 5:
- Item 1 – Medical intervention
- Item 4 – Physical therapy
Score 4 if average hours exceed 2:
- Item 7 – Dietetic hours
Score 4 if total (not average) hours exceed 6:
- Item 21 – Community home visit
If hours do not equate with a score of 4 then for inter-
disciplinary items score 3.5 and for uni-disciplinary items score 0-3 depending on therapy level
Meetings
Only additional patient specific meetings are included in this
section (not routine weekly meetings e.g ward rounds/clinical reasoning, where more than one
patient is discussed – this is already added within the computer algorithm per patient per assessment)
- Initial MDT assessment meeting
- Case conference
- Family meetings
- Discharge planning
Reports
Only patient specific reports are included in this section (not routine notes following a therapy session)
- Functional Reports
- Home Visit Reports
- Continuing health care
- District Nurse referral
- Discharge report
- Transfer letter
- Medico-legal report
Generally nurses are only included if they were actively involved
in the therapy session e.g. involved in the assessment or planning process such as devising patient specific behavioural management plan.
Handover from therapy team to nurses is not included. If the intervention is part of normal nursing activities these are captured in the nursing dependency tool
In contrast, the medical team may be involved in any of the items
within the tool and should be included
Both nursing and medical time will need to be recorded in the
MDT/report section
Nursing time will need to be reported in the clinic attendance
time
Therapy Assistants
- Included as part of the overall score – see therapy level
descriptions
Students
- Students are not included as they are in a learning role.
Once all items have been scored on the tool the data
should be entered in to the UK ROC (United Kingdom Rehabilitation Outcome Collaborative) computer software
During data entry changes to the “lead discipline”
should be made as appropriate to ensure therapy time is allocated to correct discipline
Groups/clinics will need to be entered as appropriate
with number of patients, weekly time (not fortnightly) and number of staff by each discipline present
Computerise outputs can be printed or copied/pasted into other documents as appropriate
A datasheet within the software contains all the information for all assessments and has breakdown of therapy intervention by discipline and by therapy domain
Lead Score P/T O/T SLT Psych S/W Doc Diet Nurse Music Orth Play R/Eng Other Asst Vol Subtotal Doc
3 4.50 4.50
O/T
0.00 0.00
P/T
0.00 0.00
O/T
3.5 1.00 1.50 2.50
P/T
3.5 1.50 1.50 3.00 10 2.50 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00
Lead Score P/T O/T SLT Psych S/W Doc Diet Nurse Music Orth Play R/Eng Other Asst Vol Subtotal P/T
3.5 1.00 0.50 1.50
SLT
0.00 0.00
Diet
1 0.25 0.25
SLT
1 0.50 0.50
SLT
2 1.00 1.00 7.5 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.25
Lead Score P/T O/T SLT Psych S/W Doc Diet Nurse Music Orth Play R/Eng Other Asst Vol Subtotal O/T
0.00 0.00
O/T
0.00 0.00
O/T
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Lead Score P/T O/T SLT Psych S/W Doc Diet Nurse Music Orth Play R/Eng Other Asst Vol Subtotal Psych
0.00 0.00
Psych
0.00 0.00
Psych
0.00 0.00
Psych
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Lead Score P/T O/T SLT Psych S/W Doc Diet Nurse Music Orth Play R/Eng Other Asst Vol Subtotal S/W
0.00 0.00
S/W
0.00 0.00
O/T
0.00 0.00
O/T
0.00 0.00
O/T
1 0.50 0.50 1 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50
Score P/T O/T SLT Psych S/W Doc Diet Nurse Music Orth Play R/Eng Other Asst Vol Subtotal
0.00 0.00 0.00 2 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.50 2 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 2.50 20.5 4.50 3.50 2.50 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 16.25 4.50 3.50 2.50 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 16.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.25 16.25 12.75
- 25. Groups/extra therapies
- 26. Clinic attendance
Subtotals Total NPTDA Score Total direct hours (excluding groups) Total direct hours including groups Total indirect hours Total direct and indirect hours excluding groups Total direct and indirect hours including groups Total therapy hours (- medic + 1 hour)
- 23. Multi-disciplinary meetings
- 24. Reports
Subtotals
- E. Preparing for discharge
- 18. Planning discharge/housing/care package
- 19. Benefits and finances
- 20. Equipment/adaptation for home
- 21. Community/home visits
Subtotals
- C. Activities of daily living
- 10. Personal/self-care
- 11. Domestic/community based activities
- 12. Vocational/leisure/computers/driving
Subtotals
- 22. Key-working
Subtotals
- F. Additional activities
- 1. Medical management
- 2a. Splinting/orthotics (inc FES) Upper limb
- 2b. Splinting/orthotics (inc FES) Lower limb
- 3. Seating/wheelchair
- 4. Physical therapy: active/passive handling
Subtotals
- B. Basic Functions
- D. Cognitive/Psychosocial/family support
- 13. Cognitive interventions
- 14. Behavioural management
- 15. Emotional/Mood
- 16. Formal family support
- 17. Emotional load on staff
- 8. Supported communication
- A. Physical/handling programme
- 5. Respiratory/Tracheostomy management
- 6. Swallowing
- 7. Nutrition
- 9. Speech and language interventions
Once all the data has
been entered the total score and total therapy hours are calculated by the in- built algorithms.
To obtain
- a copy of the UK ROC software
- the NPTDA tool (please state if you require the physical or cognitive version)
- further answers to specific questions about the NPTDA,
Please email
LNWH-tr.ukroc@nhs.net
Lynne Turner-Stokes, Asa Shaw, Janet Law and Hilary Rose, Development and initial validation
- f the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency, Clinical Rehabilitation 2009; 23: 922–937
Alexandrescu, R; Siegert, R; Turner-Stokes, L, The Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment Scale: A Psychometric Analysis From a Large Multicentre Neurorehabilitation Dataset, Disability And Rehabilitation. Vol. 37, Issue. 21, 2015
Congratulations you have now completed Part 1
self-service training slides
This has provided detailed information on the
background to the tool and the scoring method/rules of the tool
Please progress to Part 2 for detailed information
- n completing each item and “test yourself