search for new phenomena in dijet events with the atlas
play

Search for new phenomena in dijet events with the ATLAS detector at - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Search for new phenomena in dijet events with the ATLAS detector at s = 13 TeV Dengfeng Zhang(Tsinghua University) ILHC-ICTP2019, ICTP May 27-31, 2019 Outline Introduction to Dijet Analysis Dijet Resonance Analysis Dijet Angular


  1. Search for new phenomena in dijet events with the ATLAS detector at √ s = 13 TeV Dengfeng Zhang(Tsinghua University) ILHC-ICTP2019, ICTP May 27-31, 2019

  2. Outline • Introduction to Dijet Analysis • Dijet Resonance Analysis • Dijet Angular Analysis • Summary May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 2

  3. Introduction • pp collisions at √ s = 13 TeV, providing a wide scope to search for new phenomena at ATLAS; • Final states including partons dominate in some BSM models; • Total dijet production rates for BSM signals can be large; • Two complementary analysis: resonance analysis based on m jj and angular analysis base on 𝜓 . χ = e 2| y *| , y * = ( y 1 − y 2 ) / 2 May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 3

  4. Dijet Event Display Recorded highest mass dijet event: leading/sub-leading jet p T =3.74 TeV, |y*|=0.38, m jj =8.02 TeV. May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 4

  5. Resonance Analysis

  6. Overview of Resonance Analysis • In SM, hadron collisions produce jet pairs primarily via 2 → 2 parton scattering processes governed by QCD; • QCD predicts a smoothly falling dijet invariant mass distribution; • New particles decaying to two jets may introduce local excesses. • Sensitive to resonant signals. • Benchmark Model: q *, Z ʹ , W ʹ , W*, QBH, etc. • Three presented results: 15.7 fb -1 , 37 fb -1 and 139 fb -1 in Run 2. May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 6

  7. Event Selection and Background Estimation: 15.7 fb -1 Event Selection: Events ATLAS Preliminary 6 10 Data • GRL Fit 5 10 Statistical uncertainty on fit • LAr, Tile, SCT error rejected Function choice 4 10 • Core: Incomplete event rejected 3 10 2 • PV has at least two tracks 10 -1 s =13 TeV, 15.7 fb p -value = 0.67 10 • Pass HLT_j380 Fit Range: 1.1 - 7.1 TeV |y*| < 0.6 1 • ≥ 2 clean jets, Leading jet p T > 440 GeV Sub- Rel. Uncert. 0.4 0.2 leading jet p T >60GeV 0 − 0.2 − 0.4 • |y*| = |y 1 -y 2 |/2 < 0.6(1.2 for W*) 2 3 4 5 6 7 m [TeV] ATLAS-CONF-2016-069 jj • m jj > 1100 GeV(1717 GeV for W*) Global fitting with 3-parameters function on the m jj spectrum to estimate the background directly: f ( x ) = p 1 (1 − x ) p 2 x p 3 x = m jj / s May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 7

  8. SearchPhase Results: 15.7 fb -1 • BumpHunter Algorithm is employed to search for local excess over the background. • No significant local excess. Events Events 6 ATLAS Preliminary ATLAS Preliminary 10 6 10 -1 -1 s =13 TeV, 15.7 fb s =13 TeV, 15.7 fb Data Data 5 10 Background fit Background fit 5 10 BumpHunter interval BumpHunter interval φ q *, m = 4.0 TeV W*(sin( )=0), m = 2.8 TeV 4 10 q * x W* 4 φ 10 q *, m = 5.0 TeV W*(sin( )=0), m = 3.8 TeV q * x W* 3 10 3 10 p-value: 0.67 p-value: 0.83 2 10 2 10 φ σ × σ × W*(sin( )=0), 30 q *, 3 10 10 x p -value = 0.67 p -value = 0.83 Fit Range: 1.1 - 7.1 TeV Fit Range: 1.7 - 7.6 TeV 1 1 |y*| < 0.6 |y*| < 1.2 Significance Significance 2 2 0 0 − − 2 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 m [TeV] m [TeV] jj jj ATLAS-CONF-2016-069 May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 8

  9. Limit Setting: 15.7 fb -1 Bayesian method to set upper limits at 95% C.L. on Acceptance*Xs*Br. 1 BR [pb] BR [pb] ATLAS Preliminary ATLAS Preliminary -1 -1 s =13 TeV, 15.7 fb s =13 TeV, 15.7 fb 1 |y*| < 0.6 |y*| < 1.2 × × A A − × × 1 10 σ σ − 1 10 ATLAS-CONF-2016-069 − 2 10 φ q * W*(sin( )=0) x − 3 10 Observed 95% CL upper limit Observed 95% CL upper limit − 2 Expected 95% CL upper limit Expected 95% CL upper limit 10 68% and 95% bands 68% and 95% bands − 4 10 2 4 6 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 M [TeV] M [TeV] q * W* 95% CL exclusion limit 2012@8 TeV Model Observed Expected Observed Expected Quantum Black Hole 8.7 TeV 8.7 TeV 5.66 TeV 5.66 TeV Excited quark 5.6 TeV 5.5 TeV 4.06 TeV 3.98 TeV W ′ 2.9 TeV 3.3 TeV 2.45 TeV 2.51 TeV W ∗ 3.3 TeV 3.3 TeV 1.75 TeV 1.95 TeV May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 9

  10. Event Selection and Background Estimation: 37 fb -1 Event Selection: Events / Bin Same with last publication. ATLAS 7 10 • GRL Data 6 10 Fit • LAr, Tile, SCT error rejected Statistical uncertainty in fit 5 10 Function choice 4 • Core: Incomplete event rejected 10 3 10 • PV has at least two tracks 2 10 • Pass HLT_j380 -1 s =13 TeV, 37.0 fb 10 Fit Range: 1.1 - 8.2 TeV • ≥ 2 clean jets, Leading jet p T > 440 GeV Sub-leading 1 |y*| < 0.6 jet p T >60GeV − 1 10 Rel. Uncert. 0.4 • |y*| = |y 1 -y 2 |/2 < 0.6(1.2 for W*) 0.2 0 − 0.2 − 0.4 • m jj > 1100 GeV(1717 GeV for W*) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 052004 m [TeV] jj Sliding Window Fitting Method(SWiFt): • Slide over mass spectrum into smaller windows; • Perform fitting in each window; f ( x ) = p 1 (1 − x ) p 2 x p 3 , x = m jj / s • Stitch background fit value in each bin together for the full range prediction. May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 10

  11. SearchPhase Results: 37 fb -1 • BumpHunter Algorithm is employed to search for local excess over the background. • No significant local excess. Events / Bin Events / Bin ATLAS ATLAS 7 7 10 -1 10 -1 s =13 TeV, 37.0 fb s =13 TeV, 37.0 fb Data Data 6 6 10 10 Background fit Background fit BumpHunter interval BumpHunter interval 5 5 10 10 φ q *, m = 4.0 TeV W*(sin( )=0), m = 2.8 TeV x q * W* φ q *, m = 5.0 TeV W*(sin( )=0), m = 3.8 TeV q * x 4 4 W* 10 10 3 3 10 10 p-value: 0.63 p-value: 0.83 2 2 10 10 φ σ × σ × W*(sin( )=0), 100 q *, 10 10 10 x p -value = 0.63 p -value = 0.83 1 1 Fit Range: 1.1 - 8.2 TeV Fit Range: 1.7 - 8.1 TeV |y*| < 0.6 |y*| < 1.2 − − 1 1 10 10 Significance Significance 2 2 0 0 − − 2 2 0.5 0.5 Data-MC Data-MC JES Uncertainty JES Uncertainty MC MC 0 0 − − 0.5 0.5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 m [TeV] m [TeV] jj jj Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 052004 May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 11

  12. SearchPhase Results: 37 fb -1 Bayesian method to set upper limits at 95% C.L. on Acceptance*Xs*Br. BR [pb] BR [pb] ATLAS ATLAS 1 -1 -1 s =13 TeV, 37.0 fb s =13 TeV, 37.0 fb 1 |y*| < 0.6 |y*| < 1.2 × × A A − × × 1 10 − 1 10 σ σ Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 052004 − 2 10 − 2 10 φ q * W*(sin( )=0) x − 3 10 Observed 95% CL upper limit Observed 95% CL upper limit Expected 95% CL upper limit Expected 95% CL upper limit ± σ ± σ ± σ ± σ Expected 1 and 2 Expected 1 and 2 − − 3 4 10 10 2 4 6 2 3 4 5 m [TeV] m [TeV] q * W* 95% CL exclusion limit 2016 Model Observed Expected Observed Expected Quantum Black Hole 8.9 TeV 8.9 TeV 8.7 TeV 8.7 TeV Excited quark 6.0 TeV 5.8 TeV 5.6 TeV 5.5 TeV W ′ 3.6 TeV 3.7 TeV 2.9 TeV 3.3 TeV W ∗ 3.4 TeV 3.6 TeV 3.3 TeV 3.3 TeV May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 12

  13. Latest Resonance Analysis: 139 fb -1 Event Selection: Full Run2 Data Events ATLAS Preliminary • Good Run List (GRL) 8 10 -1 s =13 TeV, 139 fb 7 10 Data • LAr, Tile, SCT error rejected, 6 Background fit 10 BumpHunter interval 5 10 q *, m = 4.0 TeV • Core: Incomplete event rejected, q * q *, m = 5.0 TeV 4 10 q * 3 • PV has at least two tracks, 10 p-value: 0.8 2 10 • Pass HLT_j420, σ × q *, 0.1 10 p -value = 0.8 1 Fit Range: 1.1 - 8.1 TeV • ≥ 2 clean jets, Leading jet p T > 420 GeV, Sub- |y*| < 0.6 − 1 10 leading jet p T > 150 GeV, Significance 2 4 6 8 2 0 • |y*|=|y 1 -y 2 |/2<0.6 − 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 • |m jj |>1100 GeV m [TeV] ATLAS-CONF-2019-007 jj • Sliding Window Fitting Method(SWiFt) is still robust: f ( x ) = p 1 (1 − x ) p 2 x p 3 + p 4 lnx , x = m jj / s • BumpHunter Algorithm is used to search for local excess over the background. • No significant local excess. May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 13

  14. Latest Resonance Analysis: 139 fb -1 • CL s technique implemented in HistFitter framework to set upper limits at C.L. of 95%. BR [pb] Theory 1 Observed 95% CL Expected 95% CL ± σ × 1 ± σ A 2 − 1 10 × σ M q* <6.7 TeV − 2 10 − 3 10 -1 s = 13 TeV, 139 fb − 4 10 ATLAS Preliminary 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 m [TeV] q* ATLAS-CONF-2019-007 More results of other channels and Dib-jet analysis are coming soon for one paper. May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 14

  15. Angular Analysis

  16. Overview of Angular Analysis • In SM, t-channel dominates the parton scattering process, most dijet productions occur at small angles, differential cross section tends to be flat; • BSM predicts additional dijet production at large angles. χ = e 2| y *| , y * = ( y 1 − y 2 ) / 2 2 ln( E + p z y = 1 ) E − p z • Sensitive to resonant/non-resonant signals; • Benchmark Models: CI, QBH, etc. • Two published results: 15.7 fb -1 , 37 fb -1. May 29, 2019 ILHC-ICTP2019@ICTP � 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend