Se nte nc ing fo r te rro rism o ffe nc e s T HE HON. JUST I CE ROSL YN AT K I NSON AO
R v Suc c arie h
Se nte nc ing o f Suc c a rie h R v Alq udsi [2016] NSWSC 1227 • R v E lo mar (Unre po rte d, Ne w So uth • Wa le s Distric t Co urt, Ho c k DCJ, 1 July 2016) R v Mo hame d [2016] VSC 581 • R v Suc c arie h; R v Suc c arie h; E x parte • Co mmo nwe alth Dire c to r o f Pub lic Pro se c utio ns [2017] QCA 85
Co urtro o m pro c e dure s Me e t with Co urt Se c urity Ma na g e r • Ac c o mmo da te re lig io us o b se rva nc e • Ac hie ve mutua l re spe c t a nd • e ng a g e me nt Judg e to ta ke re spo nsib ility •
Use ful re so urc e s E q ua l T re a tme nt Be nc h Bo o k (Supre me • Co urt o f Que e nsla nd) - https:/ / www.sc lq ld.o rg .a u/ b e nc hb o o ks/ E xpla na to ry No te o n the Judic ia l Pro c e ss • a nd Pa rtic ipa tio n o f Muslims (Austra lia n Na tio na l I ma ms Co unc il) – http:/ / www.a nic .o rg .a u/ wp- c o nte nt/ uplo a ds/ 2018/ 02/ E xpla na to ry- No te -o n-the -Judic ia l-Pro c e ss-a nd- Muslims.pdf
F ilming o f se nte nc ing re ma rks R v Suc c arie h • R v Alq udsi [2015] NSWSC 1227 • Pro pa g a nda risks •
Co nsiste nc y in Co mmo nwe a lth se nte nc ing Co mmo nwe alth Dire c to r • o f Pub lic Pro se c utio ns v Be sim [2017] VSCA 158 Dire c to r o f Pub lic • Pro se c utio ns (Cth) v MHK [2017] VSCA 157 L o dhi v T he Que e n (2007) • 179 A Crim R 470
Co nc lusio n
Recommend
More recommend
