school improvement plan review rms demographics 10 year
play

School Improvement Plan Review RMS Demographics 10 Year Trend Data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

School Improvement Plan Review RMS Demographics 10 Year Trend Data 470 94 86 4 160 12 55 2014-2015 485 83 83 9 142 11 68 2013-2014 494 71 95 7 133 1 70 2012-2013 504 68 78 4 117 2 44 2011-2012 545 72 86 5 112 3


  1. School Improvement Plan Review

  2. RMS Demographics 10 Year Trend Data 470 94 86 4 160 12 55 2014-2015 485 83 83 9 142 11 68 2013-2014 494 71 95 7 133 1 70 2012-2013 504 68 78 4 117 2 44 2011-2012 545 72 86 5 112 3 37 2010-2011 554 81 85 15 105 2009-2010 548 77 99 13 90 2008-2009 513 68 91 10 79 2007-2008 553 65 7 70 2006-2007 608 70 16 91 2005-2006 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% White Black/African American Asian American Indian/Alaskan Native Hispanic/Latino Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Multi Races

  3. 6th Grade State Assessment Trend Data - Reading 100 79.1 77.3 75.5 74.1 73 72.4 71.3 80 68.2 61.2 60 46.8 40 20 0 2010-2011 MSP 2011-2012 MSP 2012-2013 MSP 2013-2014 MSP 2014-2015 SBA RMS 6th District State 7th Grade State Assessment Trend Data – Reading 75.7 73 80 65.2 64.2 59.7 67.2 64.5 49 56.8 54.1 60 40 20 0 2010-2011 MSP 2011-2012 MSP 2012-2013 MSP 2013-2014 MSP 2014-2015 SBA RMS 7th District State 8th Grade State Assessment Trend Data - Reading 73.9 61.8 80 69.2 67.3 63.6 57.6 61.9 65 64.1 60 49.5 40 20 0 2010-2011 MSP 2011-2012 MSP 2012-2013 MSP 2013-2014 MSP 2014-2015 SBA RMS 8th District State

  4. 6th Grade State Assessment Trend Data - Math 80 67.7 55.6 64.5 63.4 60.9 53.4 54.7 46.8 57.5 60 47.5 40 20 0 2010-2011 MSP 2011-2012 MSP 2012-2013 MSP 2013-2014 MSP 2014-2015 SBA RMS 6th District State 7th Grade State Assessment Trend Data - Math 80 66 64.2 63.1 63.3 54 47.1 56.5 55.5 50.1 60 48.7 40 20 0 2010-2011 MSP 2011-2012 MSP 2012-2013 MSP 2013-2014 MSP 2014-2015 SBA RMS 7th District State 8th Grade State Assessment Trend Data - Math 56.1 54.3 60 50.3 49.3 50.3 55.5 44.4 55.9 53.3 46.1 40 20 0 2010-2011 MSP 2011-2012 MSP 2012-2013 MSP 2013-2014 MSP 2014-2015 SBA RMS 8th District State

  5. Assessment Trends MAPs Reading Reading Key: Meeting Standard 50%-100% Approaching Standard 25%-49% Below Standard 0%-24% 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 8th 8th 8th Year Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring 52% 55% 62% 56% 58% 60% 60% 62% 67% 2012-2013 27% 25% 20% 26% 23% 20% 20% 19% 14% 21% 20% 18% 18% 19% 20% 20% 19% 19% 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 8th 8th 8th Year Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring 54% 57% 52% 61% 58% 63% 58% 56% 63% 2013-2014 23% 22% 26% 21% 21% 21% 19% 24% 22% 23% 21% 22% 18% 21% 122% 23% 20% 15% 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 8th 8th 8th Year Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring 62% 54% 55% 60% 60% 56% 63% 62% 63% 2014-2015 16% 20% 25% 26% 20% 22% 17% 20% 21% 22% 26% 20% 17% 20% 22% 20% 18% 16% 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 8th 8th 8th Year Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring 58% 48% 68% 64% 63% 67% 2015-2016 20% 24% 20% 21% 21% 18% 22% 28% 12% 15% 16% 15%

  6. Assessment Trends MAPs Math Math 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 8th 8th 8th Year Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring 54% 51% 60% 55% 58% 50% 67% 65% 37% 2012-2013 24% 30% 20% 27% 24% 35% 15% 19% 29% 22% 19% 20% 18% 18% 15% 18% 16% 34% 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 8th 8th 8th Year Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring 51% 50% 56% 55% 63% 58% 64% 65% 30% 2013-2014 29% 25% 23% 26% 21% 25% 18% 19% 46% 20% 25% 21% 19% 16% 17% 18% 16% 24% 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 8th 8th 8th Year Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring 53% 54% 53% 50% 48% 48% 59% 58% 56% 2014-2015 20% 20% 27% 25% 28% 29% 23% 24% 22% 27% 26% 20% 25% 24% 23% 18% 18% 22% 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 8th 8th 8th Year Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter Spring 57% 53% 68% 65% 68% 67% 2015-2016 20% 21% 13% 18% 18% 19% 23% 26% 19% 17% 14% 14%

  7. Goal 3: CEE perceptual survey data will reflect an increase in staff perception of cultural responsiveness from 28% in 2012 data to 85% in 2016 data Action Teachers will use specific strategies to effectively scaffold Step 1 learning to meet the needs of ELL and Special Education students. Goal 4: RMS culture perception survey data will reflect an increase of staff perception of positive student engagement from 45.6% to 75% by the 2018-2019 school year. Action Teachers will use Panther PAWS protocols in order to help communicate with all staff and Step 1 students to learn and follow behavior expectations. Action Teachers will use Positive Panther rewards for students exhibiting behaviors within the PAWS Step 2 protocols. Action A “discipline team” will be formed to consider student behaviors and discipline on a monthly Step 3 basis to consider ongoing adjustments as needed.

  8. Schoolwide strategies supported through ongoing professional development Intervention model of tiered instruction based on identified need

  9. Professional Development Focus Explicit Teaching of Vocabulary Anita Archer Close Reading Cloze Reading Strategies Scaffolding Summarization Informational Content Step-up to Writing Ongoing intervals for professional development

  10. • Review Data • Further testing to diagnose student gaps • Tiers of Intervention Targeted Intervention

  11. Examples of Gains Reading Math Name Fall 2015 RIT Winter 2016 RIT Difference % Name Fall 2015 RIT Winter 2016 RIT Difference % 194 209 201 218 +15 14% - 38% +17 15% - 43% 213 223 205 225 +10 47% - 67% +20 22% - 60% 196 212 203 225 +16 12% - 39% +16 12% - 39% 212 226 211 230 +14 38% - 68% +14 38% - 68% 211 222 194 218 +11 35% - 59% +11 35% - 59% 212 220 221 233 +8 38% - 53% +8 38% - 53%

  12. Needs Assessment Discoveries Environmental/Cultural Change Research based school management plan developed and implemented. PAWS: • Practice Respect • Activity • Work Smart • Success

  13. Acceleration Increase in: ELA Honors Sections HS Math Credit Classes (Algebra/Geometry) HS Science Credit Classes (Biology/Geology)

  14. • Math - Intervention • “Gap” Students

  15. Planning Year 2012-2013 Implementation September 2013-June 2016 Rainier Middle School Strategic Improvement Plan Strategic Plan Adopted by the Auburn School Board of Directors on insert school board approval date here.

  16. September 2011-June 2014 Auburn School District Strategic Improvement Plan District Improvement Goal 1: Student Achievement With district support, leadership, and guidance each student will achieve proficiency in the Washington Comprehensive Assessment Program (WCAP) and all schools will meet adequate yearly progress by meeting or exceeding the Washington State uniform bar in reading and mathematics in grades 3 through 8 and 10. District Improvement Goal 2: Dropout Rate and On-time Graduation Schools will reduce dropout rates and meet additional Adequate Yearly Progress indicators as determined by K-8 attendance and high school on-time graduation rates. District Improvement Goal 3: Parents/Guardians and Community Partnerships The district and schools will continue to develop partnerships to support student academic achievement and success. District Improvement Goal 4: Policies and Resource Management The district will focus on improving student academic achievement and narrowing the achievement gaps in its policy decisions and resource allocation. 2010-2011 Stated District Objectives-Student Achievement and Accountability Superintendent implements district strategic improvement plan to establish professional learning communities, become a standards-based district, produce power standards, develop common formative assessments, monitor student achievement, and provide intervention for continuous improvement for 10% more students at or above standards in reading and math. Superintendent increases high school graduation rates to 95% and increasing high school aggregate credits earned and decreasing failing grades in 9th grade. Superintendent increases learning enrichment and achievement beyond standards for all students including less represented population. School: Rainier Middle School Date of SIP Team District Improvement Goal Review: SIP Team Members: Sheila McCord James Diebag Heidi Morris Harriet Dalos Tracy Lasher Sonya Rempfer Ben Talbert John Bomar Tracy Brennan Dave Cox Robin Light

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend