Schedule and Cost Stewart Loken Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

schedule and cost
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Schedule and Cost Stewart Loken Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Schedule and Cost Stewart Loken Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 1 Funding History Proposal submitted to NSF and DOE in 2007 NSF funded in 2007


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 1

Schedule and Cost

Stewart Loken

Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

slide-2
SLIDE 2

PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 2

Funding History

  • Proposal submitted to NSF and DOE in 2007
  • NSF funded in 2007
  • DOE provided initial funding pending review
  • Proposal reviewed by DOE in 2008
  • Proposal approved with recommendation to add 1

additional year and include system maintenance

  • DOE committed to proposed funding for 3 years
slide-3
SLIDE 3

PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 3

DOE and NSF Funding

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 4

Funding versus Costs

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 5

Total Funding and Costs

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 6

Current Status of Key Tasks

  • Initial design and planning 
  • System architecture 
  • Database abstraction layer 
  • Encoder interface and literature search interface mostly 
  • Database viewer (main building blocks available)
  • Data analysis environment partly 
  • Review interface
  • Other system tasks

– Refactor existing auxiliary programs  – Status monitoring – System monitoring partly  – Verifier interface – Editor interface – Ordering system partly  – Institution data entry

  • Final acceptance test
slide-7
SLIDE 7

PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 7

  • Initial design and planning 
  • System architecture 
  • Database abstraction layer 
  • Encoder interface and literature search interface mostly 
  • Database viewer (main building blocks available)
  • Data analysis environment partly 
  • Review interface
  • Other system tasks

– Refactor existing auxiliary programs  – Status monitoring – System monitoring partly  – Verifier interface – Editor interface – Ordering system partly  – Institution data entry

  • Final acceptance test

Current Status of Key Tasks

  • All difficult parts posing potential risk to

the project are implemented

  • The encoder interface is by far the most

complex and difficult application to implement

  • The encoder interface includes all the building

blocks needed for the other applications (so building the remaining applications will be relatively fast)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 8

Future Plan - Summary

Project completion expected mid August 2011 leaving 1.5 months of contingency until end of FY11

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 9

Future Plan - Details

slide-10
SLIDE 10

PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 10

Future Plan - Details

slide-11
SLIDE 11

PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 11

Future Plan - Details

slide-12
SLIDE 12

PDG Computing Review, September 17, 2010 Stewart Loken (LBNL), Page 12

Conclusion

  • Major technical risks have been

addressed

  • The planned system is now operational

and will be upgraded incrementally in FY2011

  • The project is on schedule and within

budget

  • Planned completion in August 2011 leaves

1.5 months of contingency in FY2011