sardi ne
play

SARDI NE RE BUI L DI NG PL AN 1 CPSMT Re po r t ~ Sar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ag e nda I te m G.1.b Supple me nta l Pub lic Pre se nta tio n 1 June 2020 SARDI NE RE BUI L DI NG PL AN 1 CPSMT Re po r t ~ Sar dine Re building We tha nk the Ma na g e me nt T e a m fo r its ha rd wo rk to hig hlig ht ke


  1. Ag e nda I te m G.1.b Supple me nta l Pub lic Pre se nta tio n 1 June 2020 SARDI NE RE BUI L DI NG PL AN 1

  2. CPSMT Re po r t ~ Sar dine Re building  We tha nk the Ma na g e me nt T e a m fo r its ha rd wo rk to hig hlig ht ke y issue s (and c halle nge s ) re : sa rdine re b uilding pla n. F o r e xa mple :  CPS stoc ks ar e dr ive n pr imar ily by e nvir onme ntal for c ing, e ve n without fishing  Unde r c urre nt HCR, fishing mor tality is unlike ly to have a substantial e ffe c t o n the po pula tio n  “ It is impossible to de ve lo p a r e building pro g ra m… guar e a stoc k to MSY le ve l ante e d to r e stor in 10 ye ar s, e ve n with no fishing .”  Many r ic tions tha t mig ht b e c o nside re d …to e str mo dify fishing a c tivitie s a t lo w sto c k size have alr e ady be e n imple me nte d:  (e .g . the dire c te d fishe ry ha s b e e n c lo se d fo r 5 ye a rs, sha rp re duc tio ns in inc ide nta l c a tc h ra te a nd T AC imple me nte d in 2019)  A r e building pr o gr am may be de fine d implic itly in c ur r e nt sar dine HCR 2

  3. Range o f Alte r native s  Alte r native 1 {sta tus q uo } ~  Allowing fishing a s unde r c urre nt HCR ha s ne g lig ib le impa c t o n sto c k b ut ke e ps fishe r ie s and industr y alive  Curre nt HCR is a de - fac to r e building plan  Alte r native 2 ~ ze r ve st sc e na rio o har  “ i.e . c o mple te c lo sure o f live b ait industry [targ e ting sardine ], e liminatio n o f inc ide ntal landing s in o the r fishe rie s suc h as Pac ific mac ke re l, marke t sq uid, no rthe rn anc ho vy and Pac ific whiting , and c lo sure o f the small sc ale fishe ry ”.  Alt. 2 would pr e c ipitate e c onomic c r isis ~ But would NOT GUARANT E E sar dine r e c ove r y  5% har ve st r ate (e .g. 1,000 mt for all use s) = de ath by a thousand c uts 3

  4. Analytic al appr o ac he s: E vide nc e o f Re c r uitme nt & Abundanc e  T ha nks to Co unc il suppo rt fo r o ur ”dire c te d fishing ” E F P, NMF S a ppro ve d it a nd we a re pro duc ing ne w e vide nc e : Sma lle st = YOY 70-90g = 1yr 90-110g = 2 yr 122g = 4 yr 200g + = 5-6 yr Ba se d o n Butle r e t a l 1993 Ca lCOF I & R.Pa rrish mo de l Sa mple fro m 32 to n la nding in Mo nte re y o n 6/ 8/ 20 4

  5. April 2020 te stimo ny Co nflic t is be twe e n what fishe r me n say is o ut the r e , base d o n what the y se e , and what bio lo gists say, base d o n insuffic ie nt sc ie nc e 6,000 to ns sa rdine o b se rve d in 60 ft. wa te r ne a r Se a l Be a c h – 61 de g . Wa te r 5 2019 Spring Ae ria l E F P

  6. April 2020 te stimo ny 30-60 gr am Sar dine s ° Ca pture d 3/ 26/ 19 a s pa rt o f 30-to n po int se t ne a r Ga vio ta , a b o ve Sa nta Ba rb a ra ~ Ma ny la rg e sa rdine sc ho o ls ° Mo re e vide nc e o f re c ruitme nt 6

  7. Re : the Re building Analysis  tainty : We have se r ious c onc e r ns r e : unc e r  Re b uilding pro je c tio ns b a se d o n 2020 sa rdine a sse ssme nt  No e vide nc e o f re c ruitme nt  No ne w fishe ry a g e da ta sinc e 2015  ” Histor ic ” re c ruitme nt o nly fro m 2005-2018, inc luding  4 ye a rs o f de c lining pro duc tivity a nd 8 ye a rs o f re pro duc tive fa ilure ~12 of 18 of ye a rs in mode l (2/ 3) ha d low re c ruitme nt  Re b uilde r mo de l c a nno t inc o rpo ra te e nviro nme nta l e ffe c ts  Curre nt HCR (i.e . te mp. fra c tio n a nd 150,000 mt c uto ff) no t a pplie d  How c a n the Counc il c onside r e vide nc e of re c ruitme nt not c urre ntly inc lude d in the stoc k a sse ssme nt or re building mode ls?  SSC re c o mme nda tio n: use a sto c k-re c ruitme nt re la tio nship to g e ne ra te future re c ruitme nt  (ra the r tha n sa mpling re c ruitme nts fro m mo de l time se rie s)  Without re c ruitme nt, re building mode l a nd a na lysis would be ne g a tive ly bia se d 7

  8. Re : So c io -E c o no mic Impac t Analysis  L ive Ba it F ishe ry ~  I na b ility to la nd sa rdine s (Alte rna tive 2) wo uld c urta il a lmo st 5,000 jo b s, $602 millio n in sa le s impa c ts, $222 millio n in inc o me a nd $309 millio n in g ro ss do me stic pro duc t ( SAC pub lic c o mme nt )  Comme rc ia l sa rdine fishe ry: We re c omme nd soc io- e c onomic impa c ts of sa rdine fishe ry a na lyze d sta te by sta te e xte nding ba c k to 2007 ( b e fo re pre ma ture se a so n c lo sure s ).  Also inc lude impa c ts to fishe rie s tha t c a tc h sa rdine s inc ide nta lly (i.e . squid, a nc hovy, whiting )  E c onomic impor tanc e of Sar dine fishe r y in CA ~  age 2000- 2007 ( la st ye a r b e fo re pre ma ture se a so n c lo sure s Ave r b e g a n ) sar dine s = 38.1% of total CPS c atc h (inc luding squid) ~ mo re tha n a third o f CA’ s “3 le g g e d sto o l” o f susta ina b ility (CWPA pub lic c o mme nt ~ So urc e : T MP ) a b le 2.1.1-1 CPS F  CA we tfish industr y ne e ds sar dine s to sur vive ! 8

  9. Impo r tanc e o f CA We tfish Industr y to CA  Until re c e nt ye a rs, CA’ s c o mple x o f o f CPS fishe rie s pro duc e d 80+% of volume , 37% doc kside value o f to ta l sta te wide c o mme rc ia l fishe ry ha rve st  I mpo rta nt to ma ny ha rb o r c o mmunitie s  Vo lume is e sse ntia l to ma inta in infra struc ture , jo b s We tfish % of T otal We tfish % of T otal Por t Por t L andings Por t XV Value 97.5% 76.3% Monte r e y Har bor 96.2% 66.3% Moss L anding 98.7% 82% (sq uid) Ve ntur a 99.9% 99.9% Por t Hue ne me 99.6% 93.4% San Pe dr o 97.7% 81.4% T e r minal Island Contr ibution to State wide 82% 37% 9 L andings

  10. F ig ure 3.4.14. Re g iona l la nding s by we ig ht a nd va lue , with 12- ye a r tre nds a nd a ve ra g e proportions for e a c h ma jor We st Coa st ma na g e me nt g roup, 2000- 2011. (Ma ps c ourte sy of c o syste m Pla n p.72 2013 10 IN . Murdoc k E nvironme nta l, da ta sourc e : Pa c F Pa c ific Co a st F ishe ry E

  11. CA So c io -E c o no mic Impac ts ~ 2  “ Pac ific sardine is histo ric ally o ne o f the to p te n hig he st value d c o mme rc ial fishe rie s in Califo rnia. State wide , the c o mme rc ial Pac ific Sardine c lo sure in 2015 re sulte d in a to tal e x-ve sse l value o f o nly $343,148, whic h is 90% age o f $3,504,098 . I n 2016, le ss than the 2010-14 ave r the c lo sure re sulte d in a to tal e x-ve sse l value o f o nly $95,657, whic h is 96% le ss than the 2011-15 ave rag e o f $2,711,679.” (L t. Go v. Gavin Ne wso m)  T he Se c re ta ry o f Co mme rc e a ppro ve d Ca lifo rnia ’ s re q ue st fo r disa ste r re lie f fo r the sa rdine fishe ry fo r 2015- 16 a nd 2017-19.  Sar dine s ar e foundation of CA’s we tfish industry 11

  12. CA So c io -E c o no mic Impac ts ~ 3 Ye ar Sar dine Pounds lande d in Califor nia Value of Califor nia Por ts L andings 2007 178,476,460 lb s (80,956.4 mt) $8,206,936 (pe ak ) 2010 74,203,757 lb s (33,658.6 mt) $4,303,644 2011 61,097,986 lb s (27,713.7 mt) $5,390,048 2012 50,802,762 lb s (23,044 mt) $4,321,171 2013 15,594,475 lb s (7,073.6 mt) $1,501,919 2014 17,125,439 lb s (7,768 mt) $2,000,814 2015 3,751,035 lb s (1,701.5 mt) $343,148 2016 954,217 lb s (432.8 mt) $95,657 2017 952,891 lb s (432.2 mt) $61,453 2018 720,480 lb s (326.8 mt) $77,458 12

  13. In Summar y ~ Ple ase c o nside r :  Sa rdine a b unda nc e is drive n prima rily b y e nviro nme nta l fo rc ing ; no g ua ra nte e d time line to re b uild  Curta iling fishing unlike ly to be ne fit re c ove ry ( CPSMT Re po rt )  MSA a llo ws fle xib ility in re b uilding pla ns: pe rmits dire c te d fishing to c o ntinue  F urthe r re stric tio ns wo uld pre c ipita te so c io -e c o no mic c risis  Re po rt sta te s: “ T CPSMT he c o mb inatio n o f spawning b io mass b uffe r and re duc e d harve st rate s…me ans that a re b uilding plan fo r o ve rfishe d [sardine ] may b e de fine d implic itly.”  (We be lie ve ) the re building pla n a lre a dy e xists: e mbe dde d in the c urre nt HCR  Ple a se support Mod.Alte rna tive 1 (ABC) or Alte rna tive 1 (ACT ~ sta tus quo) a s the Pre limina ry Pre fe rre d Alte rna tive . 13

  14. e me nts : MSA Re gulato r y r e quir  MSA re q uire s e nd to o ve rfishing “imme dia te ly” fo r o ve rfishe d sto c ks… BUT  ovide s fle xibility to c o nside r b io lo g ic a l q uirks (i.e . MSA also pr sto c ks with unusua l life histo ry tra its)  sa rdine “b o o m & b ust” c yc le s a re a n e xc e ption to the (10- ye a r) rule  MSA doe s not r e quir e instant r e c ove r y  OY is lo ng -te rm g o a l  MSA doe s allow dir e c te d fishing during re b uilding  MSA a lso r e quir e s Counc il to c onside r fishing c ommunitie s, not only biology, whe n de ve loping r e building plan  Ple ase be c r e ative 14

  15. Que stio ns? 15

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend