sanemichi takahashi
play

Sanemichi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sanemichi Takahashi (Kogakuin University/NAOJ Angular momentum and magnetic field structure of cloud cores and formation of protoplanetary disks Formation and


  1. 分子雲コアの角運動量・磁場構造と 原始惑星系円盤の形成 Sanemichi Takahashi (Kogakuin University/NAOJ) Angular momentum and magnetic field structure of cloud cores and formation of protoplanetary disks

  2. Formation and Evolution of Protoplanetary Disks Gravitational collapse of cloud core Formation of protostar and protoplanetary disks Dust grows in the disk. Planet formation

  3. Angular momentum problem Assuming cloud core mass = Msun, r=0.1pc, angular velocity 0.3 km s -1 pc -1 ⇒ centrifugal radius ~400 au Gas cannot collapse to the central star directory Gas make the disk and accrete onto the star due to the angular momentum redistribution in (or out of) the disk. infalling gas Angular momentum of core is important star, disk, and planet formation.

  4. Outline • Angular momentum of cloud cores • Collapse of cloud cores and disk formation • without magnetic field • with magnetic field • Analytic model of collapse of the cloud core

  5. Outline • Angular momentum of cloud cores • Collapse of cloud cores and disk formation • without magnetic field • with magnetic field • Analytic model of collapse of the cloud core

  6. Rotation Velocity Profile Rigid rotation like Complex profile Caselli et al. 2002:Velocity gradient (ex. rigid rotation: v=r Ω , d v/ d r= Ω )

  7. Angular Velocity Distribution (Kimura Kunitomo Takahashi 2016) 26 cores (Caselli et al. 2002, cf Goodman et al.1993) Angular velocity: 0.1-6 [km s -1 pc -1 ] Typically ≲1 [km s -1 pc -1 ] (?)

  8. Angular Momentum of Cloud Cores size-velocity relation (Belloche2013, cf Goodman et al. 1993, Ohashi et al. 1997)

  9. Outline • Angular momentum of cloud cores • Collapse of cloud cores and disk formation • without magnetic field • with magnetic field • Analytic model of collapse of the cloud core

  10. Observation of Infalling Envelope rotation velocity profiles v rot ∝ r -p → Infalling envelope Outer region : p~1 (j~const) Inner region : p~0.5 → Keplerian diks (Aso et al. 2015) TMC1-A L1527 Dynamics of the envelope is directory observed. cf Ohashi et a. 2014) (Aso et al. 2017, � � 5 � � Rotational Velocity (km s -1 ) � p in =0.50 1 p out =1.22 100 50 Radius (AU) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � , � � � � � � � � �

  11. Constant j in Infalling Envelope specific angular momentum region does not appear. infall toward central star j 2 j 1 j 2 j 1 < < (cf. Li et al. 2014) Is this region formed by the infalling gas Takahashi et al. 2016 that conserves j ? Two fluid elements that conserve j Even when the infalling gas conserves j , the constant

  12. Numerical Simulation and Analytic Model Collapse of the cloud core (without magnetic field) even with the initially rigid-rotating core Constant j region is formed constant in momentum is almost Specific angular Analytic model (Takahashi et al. 2013, 2016) 3D numerical simulation (Machida et al. 2010) initial j profile Specific Angular Momentum [pc km s Specific Angular Momentum [pc k Specific Angular Momentum [pc km s -1 ] 10 -2 Model 10 Simulation 10 10 -3 ∝ 100AU � r � 1000AU 10 10 -4 10 10 100 1000 10000 Radius [AU]

  13. Origin of “constant j region” ~ can be formed as a consequence of strong The region with constant specific angular momentum j ~ const prolongate the envelope radially. Star formation:Run-away collapse j 1 Analytic model: j 2 j 1 j 2 collapse Run-away prolongation in a run-away collapse. Conservation of j in the envelope is assumed j ~const ⇔ r ini ~const

  14. Observation of Infalling Envelope cf Ohashi et a. 2014) v rot ∝ r -p ⇒Magnetic braking ? p=0.85<1: j of infalling gas decreases (Aso et al. 2015) TMC1-A L1527 rotation velocity profiles p=1.22>1: j of infalling gas increases ??? (Aso et al. 2017, � � � � 5 � Rotational Velocity (km s -1 ) p in =0.50 1 p out =1.22 100 50 Radius (AU) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

  15. >1 supercritical <1 subcritical around critical value. Mass-to-flux ratio is widely distributed Mass-to-Flux ratio (Heiles & Crutcher 2005) Magnetic Fields in Cloud Core µ intrinsic ≡ 2 π G 1 / 2 M/ Φ cloud . critical mass to flux ratio. 1 0.5 intrinsic 0 log -0.5 -1 -1.5 21 21.5 22 22.5 23 23.5 24 log N(H 2 )

  16. Collapse with Magnetic Field Angular momentum transfer in collapse phase (Magnetic Braking) Magnetic field Cloud core Rotation Lorentz force Magnetic field transports the angular momentum upward.The angular momentum of the infalling gas decreases �� � ���� � ����� � �� �

  17. Magnetic Braking Prevents Disk Formation? turbulence, misalignment, non ideal MHD (cf. Seifried et al. 2012, Joos et al. 2012, Matsumoto et al. 2004) (Tsukamoto et al. 2015) The effect of magnetic braking on the disk formation (Li et al. 2011) disk is not formed. Disk forms when j>0. is still under debating. (Machida et al. 2011) Centrifugal balance: j 2 /r 3 = GM/r 2 ⇒ r=j 2 /GM If magnetic braking efficient and j< ( GMr ) 1/2 is satisfied, � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1•10 16 8 - 1 0 1 0 • 1 . 5•10 15 - 1 7 1.0•10 0 1.0•10 -17 � � � � � � � -5•10 15 � 1.0•10 -18 � � � � -1•10 16 � 5.0•10 15 1.0•10 16 1.5•10 16 2.0•10 16 0 � � � � � � �

  18. Outline • Angular momentum of cloud cores • Collapse of cloud cores and disk formation • without magnetic field • with magnetic field • Analytic model of collapse of the cloud core

  19. Analytic Model of Infalling Envelope ◉Advantage of the analytic model Calculation of long term evolution Parameter survey Comparison with observations … (Takahashi et al. 2016) (Kimura, Kunitomo, Takahashi 2016) The analytic model is useful to investigate formation and evolution of disks ◉Investigate the effect of the magnetic field from another pint of view of numerical simulations We already develop the model without magnetic field (Takahashi et al. 2013)

  20. Collapse of Molecular Cloud Core ここで、ガスは球対称に に対する偏微分。 また、式 より 外側の球殻は赤道面ではなく角度 の位置で磁力線とつながっているため、 の項も 現れるが で次数が一つ大きくなるため項を落としている。 特に、初期に剛体 r i Δr i 磁力線 θ すると仮定しているので、落下の過程で は、球殻をラグランジュ座標 は一定。 の式 より、 これを使うと より 隣り合う球殻の位置のずれ 初期に半径が だけ離れた二つの球殻を考える 図 。二つの球殻が回転軸に平行な磁場 に貫かれている場合を考える。内側の球殻の赤道面上の点を通る磁力線が外側の球殻を貫く 時の回転軸からの角度を とする。このとき We calculate the mass infall rate で表した時の ここで、 。従って、 approximately taking into account the effect of pressure. Spherical collapse, Isothermal, (cf. Cassen and Moosman 1981) Pressure gradient force ∝ r -1 (Takahashi et al. 2013, 2016) Assumption: 磁場入り星形成モデル また、この赤道面からの高さ 球対称なので、 は一定。各時刻 での 磁力線でつな がれたガスの方位角のずれ が分かれば磁力線の形状が分かる。 の式 ここで ここで ここで について差分をとると、 時刻一定で u � 1 t = 2 dx π t ff f − 1 ln x + x − 1 − 1 � x r i : initial radius ここで x = r/r i . 赤道面を考えると t ff : free fall time f : Initial gravity/pressrue

  21. Effect of Magnetic Fields Magnetic fields deforms with collapse ⇒magnetic tension We use ideal MHD in the envelope and aligned fields magnetic fields magnetic tension

  22. Magnetic Tension Neglecting the back reaction (~upper limit of magnetic tension) We focus on midplane gas We obtain time evolution of angular momentum and derive condition for disk formation approximately. magnetic tension

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend