Sampling Plans and Initial Condition Problems For Continuous Time Duration Models
James J. Heckman University of Chicago Econ 312, Spring 2019
Heckman Sampling Plans
Sampling Plans and Initial Condition Problems For Continuous Time - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Sampling Plans and Initial Condition Problems For Continuous Time Duration Models James J. Heckman University of Chicago Econ 312, Spring 2019 Heckman Sampling Plans Sampling Plans and Initial Condition Problems For Continuous Time Duration
Heckman Sampling Plans
Heckman Sampling Plans
Heckman Sampling Plans
0 (x)dx < ∞
Heckman Sampling Plans
0 −
Heckman Sampling Plans
Heckman Sampling Plans
Heckman Sampling Plans
ta
Heckman Sampling Plans
1 If f (t) = θe−tθ, then g(tb) = θe−tbθ and g(ta) = θe−taθ.
Heckman Sampling Plans
1 E(Ta) = m
a(1 − F(ta))|∞ 0 −
ad(1 − F(ta))
aF(ta)dta = 1
Heckman Sampling Plans
1 E(Tb) = m
2 E(Tc) = m(1 + σ2
c F(tc)
Heckman Sampling Plans
1 h′(t) > 0 → E(Ta) = E(Tb) < m. Proof: See Barlow and
2 h′(t) < 0 → E(Ta) = E(Tb) > m. Proof: See Barlow and
Heckman Sampling Plans
Heckman Sampling Plans
Heckman Sampling Plans
& &
0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 t P D F
t h e S p e l l s : W e i b u l l D i s t r i b u t i
s Weibull Distribution λ = 0.1, k = 0.5 Weibull Distribution λ = 0.5, k = 1.0 Weibull Distribution λ = 0.5, k = 2.0 Weibull Distribution λ = 1.0, k = 3.0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 t C D F
t h e D i s t r i b u t i
: W e i b u l l Weibull Distribution λ = 0.1, k = 0.5 Weibull Distribution λ = 0.5, k = 1.0 Weibull Distribution λ = 0.5, k = 2.0 Weibull Distribution λ = 1.0, k = 3.0
Heckman Sampling Plans
& !" &
0.5 1 1.5 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 t Hazard Function of the Distribution: Weibull Weibull Distribution λ = 0.1, k = 0.5 Weibull Distribution λ = 0.5, k = 1.0 Weibull Distribution λ = 0.5, k = 2.0 Weibull Distribution λ = 1.0, k = 3.0 0.5 1 1.5 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 t Integrated Hazard Function of the Distribution: Weibull Weibull Distribution λ = 0.1, k = 0.5 Weibull Distribution λ = 0.5, k = 1.0 Weibull Distribution λ = 0.5, k = 2.0 Weibull Distribution λ = 1.0, k = 3.0
Heckman Sampling Plans
0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 t Observed (T b) and Original PDFs of the Spells The Observed PDF of Spells (T
b)
The Original PDF (Weibull Distribution λ = 0.1, k = 0.5)
Heckman Sampling Plans
0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 t Observed (T b) and Original PDFs of the Spells The Observed PDF of Spells (T
b)
The Original PDF (Weibull Distribution λ = 0.5, k = 2.0)
Heckman Sampling Plans
0.5 1 1.5 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 t Observed (T b) and Original PDFs of the Spells The Observed PDF of Spells (T
b)
The Original PDF (Weibull Distribution λ = 1.0, k = 3.0)
Heckman Sampling Plans
0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 t O b s e r v e d ( T c ) a n d O r i g i n a l P D F s
t h e S p e l l s The Observed PDF of Spells (T
c)
The Original PDF (Weibull Distribution λ = 0.1, k = 0.5)
Heckman Sampling Plans
0.5 1 1.5 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 t O b s e r v e d ( T c ) a n d O r i g i n a l P D F s
t h e S p e l l s The Observed PDF of Spells (T
c)
The Original PDF (Weibull Distribution λ = 0.5, k = 1.0)
Sampling Plans
0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 t Observed (T c) and Original PDFs of the Spells The Observed PDF of Spells (T
c)
The Original PDF (Weibull Distribution λ = 0.5, k = 2.0)
Sampling Plans
0.5 1 1.5 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 t Observed (T c) and Original PDFs of the Spells The Observed PDF of Spells (T
c)
The Original PDF (Weibull Distribution λ = 1.0, k = 3.0)
Heckman Sampling Plans