Sabbatical
Making Space for Renewal
Sabbatical Making Space for Renewal Why sabbatical? The Balance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Sabbatical Making Space for Renewal Why sabbatical? The Balance Chambers Sharif M Abdullah Monthly Inventory ENOUGHNESS Physical Emotional Social Mental Transcendent Other Food/Water Love Care Family Education Peace Reproduction
Making Space for Renewal
The Balance Chambers Sharif M Abdullah
Monthly Inventory ENOUGHNESS Physical Emotional Social Mental Transcendent Other Food/Water Love Care Family Education Peace Reproduction Clothing Respect Community Intelligence Contemplation Work Shelter Touch Nation Stimulation Ceremony Recreation TOTAL Purpose Tribe Meaning Creativity TOTAL Safety Service TOTAL TOTAL Joy and Fun Sacrifice Happiness TOTAL Sorrow Grief TOTAL
me
RATING Excess 3
Full 2
Low 1
and money
§ Greater confidence § Better relationships with staff, board, funders, and
community
§ New vision § Staying in the job
§ Governance improves § Connection and collaboration § Shared leadership – “building the bench” § Dry run for succession planning
Stage II Survival Stage I Existence Stage III Success/Growth Stage IV Take-Ofg Stage V Resource Maturity Critjcal to the Organizatjon Important but Managed Modestly Irrelevant
able to do CASH Matching of Org. Goals & Exec. Dir. & Funders Goals People Quality & Diversity Strategic Planning Systems & Controls
Based on the work of Neil Churchill and Virginia Lewis, HBR
DIRECTOR WHO TOOK SABBATICAL
§
Shared a greater amount of decision-making with managers (85%)
§
Was more comfortable delegating major responsibilities (84%)
§
Felt that the managers in their organization had become more skilled in their positions (83%)
§
Restructured the management team (69%)
§
Restructured their job and delegated some of their duties to others (64%)
§
Reported that the board of directors became more effective (60%)
INTERIM LEADERS
§
Report that their job has been restructured and they continue to be responsible for some duties they performed as an interim leader (60%)
§
Agree that managers are better skilled in positions (77%)
§
Agree that there is more delegation (77%)
§
Respond that they have a greater sphere of decision-making authority (67%)
§
Report that the management team has been restructured (43%)
§ Over-dependence upon the leader as lead
fundraiser (with no one stepping up during his or her absence)
§ Increased strain on an already under-capitalized
nonprofit, which results in a particularly stressful experience for the interim leader
§ Organizational politics, such as described by one
awardee: “A power vacuum was created and a couple of employees took advantage”
§ A realization that a leader on sabbatical is no
longer quite the right match for his or her
resignation as an unintended consequence
Selling it to the Board Selling it to myself Making it a reality
§ Tenure prior to eligibility § Maximum length § Paid or unpaid § Process for application § How many employees at a time § Requirements during sabbatical § Reporting mechanism
§ A willing leader § A competent leader § A trusted leader
§ Authority § Process § Messaging with different constituencies § Planning for organizational change § Abating challenges § The nitty gritty details
§ The art of presence § Taking my vacation § Creating space for deep work § Prioritizing my family
§ Need to grow staff § Relationships overly reliant on Executive Director § Cultivating resiliency for all staff
elaird@wvcan.org 304-414-4455