routine contrast radiology after oesophagectomy and total
play

Routine contrast radiology after oesophagectomy and total - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Routine contrast radiology after oesophagectomy and total gastrectomy Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough Mr A Madhavan Ms H Wescott Mr N Jennings Mr PA Davis Mr SMD Dresner MR YKS


  1. Routine contrast radiology after oesophagectomy and total gastrectomy Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough Mr A Madhavan Ms H Wescott Mr N Jennings Mr PA Davis Mr SMD Dresner MR YKS Vishwanath

  2. INTRODUCTION • High morbidity and mortality associated with anastomotic leaks • 50% mortality with leaks • No role for routine contrast swallow following gastrectomy (Lamb et al) • Still widely practiced in the UK • CT scan at 7 day improves sensitivity and negative predictive value for diagnosing anastomotic leak (Upponi et al)

  3. AIMS • Assessing and comparing the use of selective contrast radiography after surgery with routine tests: 1. Detection of anastomotic leaks 2. Performance of routine radiography 3. Clinical outcome

  4. METHODS • Retrospective study • Total gastrectomy and subtotal oesophagectomy for malignancy • January 2006 to January 2012 (n=270) • Contrast radiography performed according to surgeon’s preferences • Non-ionic contrast, no barium

  5. PATIENT GROUPS • Routine contrast swallow (RS) • Selective contrast swallow (SS) depending on clinical progression

  6. RESULTS Total number n = 270 Routine Selective n = 184 n = 86

  7. PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS RS SS p n=184 n=86 value Age (years) 64 63 ns M:F 3:1 3.2:1 ns Day of swallow 5 (2-11) 10 (6-34) ns Oesophagectomy 143 45 Total Gastrectomy 41 41

  8. RESULTS OF ROUTINE CONTRAST RADIOLOGY RS n = 184 n=176 Leak No leak n = 10 n = 166 Clinical leak Leak n = 6 n = 6

  9. PERFORMANCE OF ROUTINE RADIOLOGY • Sensitivity 40% • Specificity 96% • Positive predictive value 60% • Negative predictive value 97%

  10. RESULTS OF SELECTIVE RADIOLOGY SS n = 86 Swallow No swallow n = 21 n = 35 Leak Clinical Leak n = 0 n = 1

  11. CLINICAL OUTCOMES RS SS n=184 n=86 Post-operative stay 19 16 Anastomotic leak rate 6.7% 1.1% In hospital mortality 1.6% 4.7% MORTALITY 2.6% LEAKS 4.8%

  12. CONCLUSION • Leak rate following total gastrectomy and sub-total oesophagectomy is low � Total gastrectomy – 7% � Oesophagectomy – 4% • Mortality following resection for upper gastrointestinal malignancy is 2.6% • Contrast swallows performed in the early post operative period to exclude a mechanical problem do not exclude a subsequent ischaemic breakdown

  13. REFERENCES 1. Lamb et al. Prospective study of routine contrast radiology after total gastrectomy. Br J Surg, 2004 Aug;91(8):1015-9 2. Upponi et al. Radiological detection of post oesophagectomy anastomotic leak – a comparison between multidetector CT and fluroscopy. Br J Radiology, 2008 Jul;81 (967):545-8 3. Boone et al. Diagnostic value of routine aqeuous contrast swallow examination after oesophagectomy for detecting leakage of the cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis. ANZ J Surg, 2008 Sep; 78(9); 784-90

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend