Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography Contrast Contrast - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

contrast echocardiography echocardiography contrast
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography Contrast Contrast - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Jean- -Louis J. Louis J. Vanoverschelde Vanoverschelde, MD, PhD , MD, PhD Jean Universit catholique de catholique de Louvain Louvain Universit


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Jean Jean-

  • Louis J.

Louis J. Vanoverschelde Vanoverschelde, MD, PhD , MD, PhD

Contrast Echocardiography Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Universit Université é catholique de catholique de Louvain Louvain Brussels, Belgium Brussels, Belgium

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Transit time of red blood cells Transit time of red blood cells

0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7

Transit time of Transit time of µ µbubbles bubbles

0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.75 1.00 1.00

Jayaweera Jayaweera et al. et al. Circ. Res.

  • Circ. Res. 1994

1994

2 2 4 4 6 6 8 8 10 10

Diameter Diameter

( (µ µm) m) 20 20 40 40 60 60 80 80 100 100 10 102

2 x 120

x 120

8.10 8.108

8

ml ml-

  • 1

1

4.3 4.3 µ µm m

Relation of Relation of µ µbubbles to red blood cells bubbles to red blood cells

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

ultrasound ultrasound pressure pressure µ µbubble bubble radius radius

compression compression rarefaction rarefaction Effect of low acoustic energy on Effect of low acoustic energy on µ µbubbles size bubbles size

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

ultrasound ultrasound pressure pressure µ µbubble bubble radius radius

compression compression rarefaction rarefaction Effect of high acoustic energy on Effect of high acoustic energy on µ µbubbles bubbles

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

0 kPa 0 kPa 100 kPa 100 kPa 1MPa 1MPa

Non Non-

  • linear scattering properties

linear scattering properties Fundamental and harmonic Fundamental and harmonic frequencies frequencies Non Non-

  • linear scattering properties

linear scattering properties Harmonic frequency Harmonic frequency µ µbubble destruction bubble destruction Stimulated acoustic emission Stimulated acoustic emission

MI < 0.3 MI < 0.3 MI > 1.0 MI > 1.0

Effect of acoustic energy on Effect of acoustic energy on µ µbubbles scattering properties bubbles scattering properties

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Time (ms) Time (ms)

80 80 160 160 240 240 320 320

Intensity (dB) Intensity (dB)

8 8 16 16 24 24

Destruction of contrast by ultrasound Destruction of contrast by ultrasound

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

  • Left ventricular opacification

Left ventricular opacification

  • Myocardial perfusion

Myocardial perfusion

  • Assessment of reperfusion and

Assessment of reperfusion and myocardial viability myocardial viability

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Improved Improved endocardial border endocardial border delineation delineation

  • reduced

reduced inter inter-

  • and

and intra intra-

  • observer
  • bserver

variability variability

  • improved detection

improved detection of

  • f regional wall

regional wall motion motion abnormalities abnormalities

  • improved calculation

improved calculation of LV volumes

  • f LV volumes

and ejection and ejection fraction fraction Left ventricular opacification Left ventricular opacification

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Inter Inter-

  • institutional agreement according to image quality

institutional agreement according to image quality Agreement in % Agreement in %

Hoffmann et al. Hoffmann et al. J Am Coll Cardiol J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:330 1996;27:330

20 20 40 40 60 60 80 80 100 100 120 120

A A B B C C D D E E

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

NA NA, , 6 67 7 y.o. male y.o. male

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

NA NA, , 6 67 7 y.o. male y.o. male

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Effect of left ventricular opacification on accuracy of DbE Effect of left ventricular opacification on accuracy of DbE

Dolan et al. Dolan et al. Am Heart J Am Heart J 2001;142:908 2001;142:908

% WTh % WTh Sensitivity Sensitivity Specificity Specificity Accuracy Accuracy

(%) (%)

20 20 40 40 60 60 80 80 100 100

* *

LVO LVO no LVO no LVO

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

  • Left ventricular opacification

Left ventricular opacification

  • Myocardial perfusion

Myocardial perfusion

  • Assessment of reperfusion and

Assessment of reperfusion and myocardial viability myocardial viability

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Real Real-

  • time perfusion imaging using power modulation

time perfusion imaging using power modulation

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Wei Wei et al. et al. Am J Am J Physiol Physiol 2001,280:H1896. 2001,280:H1896.

1 1 2 2 4 4 5 5

LAD / Cx ratio LAD / Cx ratio

3 3

LAD LAD Ado Ado LAD stenosis LAD stenosis + Ado + Ado

  • cclusion
  • cclusion

MCE MBV MCE MBV µ µspheres spheres

99m 99mTc

Tc-

  • MIBI

MIBI

LAD adenosine LAD adenosine LAD stenosis + LAD stenosis + adenosine adenosine LAD occlusion LAD occlusion

MCE versus MIBI for assessment of myocardial blood volume MCE versus MIBI for assessment of myocardial blood volume

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography How do we get from myocardial blood volume How do we get from myocardial blood volume to myocardial blood flow ? to myocardial blood flow ?

DYNAMIC IMAGING DYNAMIC IMAGING

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

time time Quantification of myocardial blood flow Quantification of myocardial blood flow Flash Flash

1 1st

st cardiac

cardiac cycle cycle 2 2nd

nd cardiac

cardiac cycle cycle 3 3rd

rd cardiac

cardiac cycle cycle 4 4th

th cardiac

cardiac cycle cycle 5 5th

th cardiac

cardiac cycle cycle

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Real Real-

  • time perfusion imaging using power modulation

time perfusion imaging using power modulation

Van Camp et al., Van Camp et al., JASE JASE 2003;16:263 2003;16:263

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Real Real-

  • time perfusion imaging using power modulation

time perfusion imaging using power modulation

Van Camp et al., Van Camp et al., JASE JASE 2003;16:263 2003;16:263

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Time (s) Time (s)

2 2 4 4 6 6 8 8 10 10 12 12 14 14 16 16 18 18

Video intensity Video intensity

2 2 4 4 6 6 8 8 10 10 12 12 14 14 16 16 18 18

Stenosis + Adenosine Stenosis + Adenosine Real Real-

  • time perfusion imaging using power modulation

time perfusion imaging using power modulation

Van Camp et al., Van Camp et al., JASE JASE 2003;16:263 2003;16:263

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Microsphere blood flow Microsphere blood flow

(ml.min (ml.min-

  • 1

1.g

.g-

  • 1

1)

)

β β slope (s slope (s-

  • 1

1)

) Microsphere blood flow Microsphere blood flow

(ml.min (ml.min-

  • 1

1.g

.g-

  • 1

1)

)

Real Real-

  • time perfusion imaging using power modulation

time perfusion imaging using power modulation

1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75

y = 0.45x y = 0.45x -

  • 6.26

6.26 r = 0.93 r = 0.93

1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 10 10 15 15 20 20 25 25

y = 5.91x y = 5.91x -

  • 0.69

0.69 r = 0.91 r = 0.91

A x A x β β (dB (dB· ·s s-

  • 1

1)

)

Van Camp et al., Van Camp et al., JASE JASE 2003;16:263 2003;16:263

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

MN MN, , 50 y.o. male 50 y.o. male

Peltier Peltier et al. et al. J JACC ACC 2004;43:257 2004;43:257

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

DIPYRIDAMOLE MCE DIPYRIDAMOLE MCE

Peltier Peltier et al. et al. J JACC ACC 2004;43:257 2004;43:257

MN MN, , 50 y.o. male 50 y.o. male

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

DIPYRIDAMOLE MCE DIPYRIDAMOLE MCE DIPYRIDAMOLE SPECT DIPYRIDAMOLE SPECT

Peltier Peltier et al. et al. J JACC ACC 2004;43:257 2004;43:257

MN MN, , 50 y.o. male 50 y.o. male

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

DIPYRIDAMOLE MCE DIPYRIDAMOLE MCE DIPYRIDAMOLE SPECT DIPYRIDAMOLE SPECT

Peltier Peltier et al. et al. J JACC ACC 2004;43:257 2004;43:257

MN MN, , 50 y.o. male 50 y.o. male

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Dipyridamole real Dipyridamole real-

  • t

time Power Modulation ime Power Modulation Time (s) Time (s)

2 2 4 4 6 6 8 8 10 10 12 12 14 14 16 16 18 18

Videointensity Videointensity (dB) (dB)

2 2 4 4 6 6 8 8 10 10 12 12

Peltier Peltier et al. et al. J JACC ACC 2004;43:257 2004;43:257

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Dipyridamole real Dipyridamole real-

  • t

time Power Modulation ime Power Modulation

Rest Rest Dip Dip Rest Rest Dip Dip Rest Rest Dip Dip Rest Rest Dip Dip

β β slope (s slope (s-

  • 1

1)

)

0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.25 < 50% < 50% 70 70-

  • 90%

90% 50 50-

  • 70%

70% > 90% > 90% * * * * * * † † * * † †

n=292 n=292 n=32 n=32 n=92 n=92 n=42 n=42

Peltier Peltier et al. et al. J JACC ACC 2004;43:257 2004;43:257

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Dipyridamole real Dipyridamole real-

  • t

time Power Modulation ime Power Modulation % luminal diameter stenosis % luminal diameter stenosis β β reserve reserve

20 20 40 40 60 60 80 80 100 100 1 1 2 2 3 3

y = 2.65 (1 y = 2.65 (1-

  • e

e-

  • 0.09(x

0.09(x-

  • 100)

100))

) r = 0.85 r = 0.85

Peltier Peltier et al. et al. J JACC ACC 2004;43:257 2004;43:257

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Peltier Peltier et al. et al. J JACC ACC 2004;43:257 2004;43:257

Dipyridamole real Dipyridamole real-

  • t

time Power Modulation ime Power Modulation

100 100 75 75 50 50 25 25

Specificity (%) Specificity (%)

100 100 75 75 50 50 25 25 100 100 75 75 50 50 25 25

Sensitivity (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Specificity (%) β β reserve reserve A * A * β β reserve reserve

Area under the curve Area under the curve =0.85 =0.85 Area under the curve Area under the curve =0.86 =0.86

100 100 75 75 50 50 25 25

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Dipyridamole RTCE: Prognostic implications Dipyridamole RTCE: Prognostic implications Years Years Event fre survival (%) Event fre survival (%)

Tsusui Tsusui et al. et al. J JCirculation Circulation 2005;112:1444 2005;112:1444

Normal MP Normal MP Fixed perfusion defect Fixed perfusion defect Inducible perfusion defect Inducible perfusion defect Fixed + inducible perfusion defect Fixed + inducible perfusion defect

P<0.001 P<0.001

20 20 40 40 80 80 100 100 60 60 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

  • Left ventricular opacification

Left ventricular opacification

  • Myocardial perfusion

Myocardial perfusion

  • Assessment of reperfusion and

Assessment of reperfusion and myocardial viability myocardial viability

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

T.V.H. T.V.H. -

♂ -

  • 46 year old

46 year old 10.43 am : ECG 10.43 am : ECG 10.43 am : ECG

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

11.43 am Coronary angiography 11.43 am Coronary angiography T.V.H. T.V.H. -

♂ -

  • 46 year old

46 year old

slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

11.53 am : direct angioplasty and stenting 11.53 am : direct angioplasty and stenting T.V.H. T.V.H. -

♂ -

  • 46 year old

46 year old

slide-44
SLIDE 44
slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Ito et al. Ito et al. Circulation Circulation 1992;85:1699. 1992;85:1699.

Before PTCA Before PTCA After PTCA After PTCA

* * *** ***

Average segmental score Average segmental score

0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.8

Acute Acute Chronic Chronic Assessment of the Assessment of the « « no no-

  • reflow

reflow » » phenomenon by i.c. MCE phenomenon by i.c. MCE

slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48
slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50

After FLASH After FLASH After refill After refill MIBI SPECT MIBI SPECT

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

Detection of myocardial viability with Detection of myocardial viability with intravenous intravenous MCE MCE Early MCE Early MCE Late MCE Late MCE Sensitivity Sensitivity 21% 21% 62% 62% Specificity Specificity 89% 89% 85% 85% PPV PPV 63% 63% 78% 78% NPV NPV 57% 57% 72% 72%

Swinburn Swinburn et al. et al. J J Am Am Coll Cardiol Coll Cardiol 2001 2001; ;38 38: :19. 19.

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Contrast Contrast Echocardiography Echocardiography

  • Left ventricular opacification

Left ventricular opacification

  • Myocardial perfusion

Myocardial perfusion

  • Assessment of reperfusion and

Assessment of reperfusion and myocardial viability myocardial viability