e: academy@yhahsn.nhs.uk/ t: 01274 383926
www.improvementacademy.org
Or visit our Academy Office: Bradford Institute for Health Research Temple Bank House / Duckworth Lane / Bradford / BD9 6RJ
Roundtable Event Met Suite, Leeds Metropolitan Hotel 13 th January - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Human Factors Roundtable Event Met Suite, Leeds Metropolitan Hotel 13 th January 2016 e: academy@yhahsn.nhs.uk/ t: 01274 383926 www.improvementacademy.org Or visit our Academy Office: Bradford Institute for Health Research Temple Bank House /
e: academy@yhahsn.nhs.uk/ t: 01274 383926
www.improvementacademy.org
Or visit our Academy Office: Bradford Institute for Health Research Temple Bank House / Duckworth Lane / Bradford / BD9 6RJ
Part of the Yorkshi kshire e & Humber ber AHSN e: academy@yhahsn.nhs.uk/ t: 01274 383926
www.improvementacademy.org
Or visit our Academy Office: Bradford Institute for Health Research Temple Bank House / Duckworth Lane / Bradford / BD9 6RJ
Part of the Yorkshi kshire e & Humber ber AHSN
10:20 The concept of human factors – Gerry Armitage 10:50 Mapping the terrain of human factors – Debbie Clark 11:20 Refreshment Break 11:35 Optimising safe performance – Rebecca Lawton 12:15 Human factors education – Debbie Clark/ Wayne Robson 13:00 Lunch
13:45 Open Space – Whole Group 15:30 Gina’s Story – Lee Cutler 16:15 Next Steps – Debbie Clark 16:30 Close
th 1415
th 1415
70,000 patients per year
some simulation training were in place
– take an overview of the existing situation from an HF viewpoint – look at the opportunities for incorporating more HF principles to improve patient safety
Training Working Practices Quality and Risk Management Standard text = existing
In situ Simulation
Monthly 2hr rolling program 1/2hr quality improvement session
Human Factors Training
Simulation as above
Simulation Courses
Multidisciplinary: CRUMPET EM trainees: ACCS, CT3 paeds and ST4 courses Simulation Faculty
Policies
Escalation guidelines Clinical Guidelines:
wall in resus: cardiac arrest, trauma team etc.
Handover, briefing and debriefing Checklists
Guided by risk assessment: Sedation, sepsis
Actions from incidents
Improvement actions: checklists, guidelines, in situ sim, audit Feedback to staff, M and M meetings
Quality and Safety Metrics
CEM Audit Program TARN Mortality review: Incident reports
Training Working Practices Quality and Risk Management
In situ Simulation
Monthly 2hr rolling program Weekly 1/2hr quality improvement session Mock Arrest
Human Factors Training
Simulation as above E learning module Workshops Teamwork Training and Handbook: Team STEPPS Safety Notices and posters HF Work Based Assessment
Simulation Courses
Multidisciplinary: CRUMPET EM trainees: ACCS, CT3 paeds and ST4 courses Simulation Faculty
Policies
Escalation guidelines Clinical Guidelines:
wall in resus: cardiac arrest, trauma team etc. Senior review guideline
Handover, briefing and debriefing
Formal handovers using tool Safety briefing (daily) Debrief following incidents
Checklists
Guided by risk assessment: Sedation, sepsis, first fit, discharge etc. Weekly 1/2hr quality
Actions from incidents
Improvement actions: checklists, guidelines, posters, in situ sim, briefing, audit Feedback to staff: lesson of the week, summary information, M and M meetings Must reduce risk whilst balancing unintended consequences
Quality and Safety Metrics
CEM Audit Program TARN Mortality review: avoidable deaths Incident reports including harm/no harm ratio Safety attitude survey Pneumonia care bundle audit Quality and Safety Suggestions Box
Training Working Practices Quality and Risk Management
In situ Simulation
Monthly 2hr rolling program Weekly 1/2hr quality improvement session Mock Arrest
Human Factors Training
Simulation as above E learning module Workshops Teamwork Training and Handbook: Team STEPPS Safety Notices and posters HF Work Based Assessment
Simulation Courses
Multidisciplinary: CRUMPET EM trainees: ACCS, CT3 paeds and ST4 courses Simulation Faculty
Policies
Escalation guidelines Clinical Guidelines:
wall in resus: cardiac arrest, trauma team etc. Senior review guideline
Handover, briefing and debriefing
Formal handovers using tool Safety briefing (daily) Debrief following incidents
Checklists
Guided by risk assessment: Sedation, sepsis, first fit, discharge etc. Weekly 1/2hr quality
Actions from incidents
Improvement actions: checklists, guidelines, posters, in situ sim, briefing, audit Feedback to staff: lesson of the week, summary information, M and M meetings Must reduce risk whilst balancing unintended consequences
Quality and Safety Metrics
CEM Audit Program TARN Mortality review: avoidable deaths Incident reports including harm/no harm ratio Safety attitude survey Pneumonia care bundle audit Quality and Safety Suggestions Box
Improving patient care
Lawton e
Domain Meaning Knowledge
Does the person know they should be doing behaviour X? Do they understand the evidence?
Skills
Does the person know how to do the behaviour (X)? How easy or difficult does the person find behaviour?
Beliefs about capabilities
How easy is it for the person to do X? Have they previously encountered problems? How confident are they that they can overcome difficulties?
Motivation and goals
How much do they want to do X? How much do they feel the need to do X? Are there incentives to do X? Are there competing priorities?
Environment
To what extent do physical or resource factors hinder X? Are there any competing tasks or time constraints?
Beliefs about consequences
What do they think will happen if they do X? What are the costs/consequences of doing X? Does the evidence suggest that doing X is a good thing?
Emotion
Does doing X evoke an emotional response? To what extent do emotional factors help or hinder X? How does emotion affect X?
Social influences
To what extent do social influences help or hinder X? Will the person observe others doing X?
Role/identity
How much is doing X part of the person’s identity? How much doing X important to the person?
Memory/attention
Can the person remember to do behaviour X? Do they usually do X?
Action planning
Does the person put plans in place to ensure they do the behaviour?
Involve stakeholders
Medical directors and sharp end staff
Identify target behaviour
Audit and discussion
Identify barriers
Influences on Patient Safety Behaviours Questionnaire (IPSBQ)
Confirm barriers and generate intervention strategies
Focus groups
Support staff to implement and evaluate intervention
Joint approach Re-auditing Healthcare professionals not using pH as the first line method for checking tube position
authority funding
the implementation of NPSA alerts
(others were safe use of midazolam, medicines reconcilliation)
Barrier Strategy Behaviour change technique* Social influences
meetings by experts in the area
correct behaviour
consequences, and social/ environmental consequences
(unspecified) Emotion
anticipated regret and to reframe perspective on behaviour
Environmental context and resources
placed NG, place to record pH values, etc.
pH testing and link to all relevant documentation
environment Bcap (and knowledge and skills)
behaviour
Audit information Hospital 1 Hospital 2 Hospital 3 Hospital 4 (Control) Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
Number of sets of notes audited 49 48 43 44 44 40 53 46 pH of aspirate from stomach 18% 63% 12% 73% 14% 33% 45% 46% Patient sent for X-ray 49% 23% 77% 9% 41% 40% 25% 20% Tube placed in radiology 36% 10% Information not documented 33% 14% 11% 18% 9% 17% 30% 34%
Target behaviour: Using pH as the first line method for checking tube position
Development and initial validation of the influences on patient safety behaviours questionnaire. Implementation Science, 8(1), 81.
a theory-based approach to the design of localized patient safety
a theory-based instrument to identify barriers and levers to best hand hygiene practice among healthcare practitioners. Implement Sci, 8, 111.
Mohammed, M. A. (2014). Collaborating with front-line healthcare professionals: the clinical and cost effectiveness of a theory based approach to the implementation of a national guideline. BMC health services research, 14(1), 648.
Academy for Yorkshire and Humber website
professionals and managers in Y&H)
Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE)
Patient Measure
44-item questionnaire:
Patient Incident Reporting Tool
was involved?
them?
happening again?
preventability and severity
Example items from the PMOS
Patient Measure of Safety Patient Incident Reporting Tool
Patient experience of safety measured Information collated and fed back to wards Feedback considered in Action Planning Group Action Planning Group - plan, implement, monitor changes
Mid-Point Meeting Start up Meeting
SUMMARY REPORT - Overall safety profile from questionnaire responses
Feedback collected from 25 patients on 33 wards across 3 hospital Trusts: Feedback collected 3 times over 18 months 17 intervention wards met to consider patient feedback and action plan to improve patient safety, quality and experience Effectiveness = improvements to patient feedback scores over time, more positive safety culture and higher %harm free care scores
physical or structural)
Issue e.g. noise at night
A B C
response rate, but measure quite challenging for some
a multi-disciplinary team on both occasions, made an action plan and implemented it
support implementation
PMOS measure currently being developed http://yqsr.org/impact/
Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2011.
hospital setting? A systematic review. BMJ quality & safety, 21(8), 685-699.
Watt, I. S., & Wright, J. (2013). Developing a reliable and valid patient measure of safety in hospitals (PMOS): a validation study. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2013.
measure of safety (PMOS). BMJ quality & safety, 22(7), 554-562.
care? An analysis of staff and patient survey data and routinely collected outcomes. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2014.
Spot it Understand it Disseminate it
a different approach to achieving patient safety. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2014.
positive deviance within healthcare organisations? A systematic review. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2015
wards to improve patient safety: an observational study protocol. BMJ open, 5(12), e009650.
Improving patient care
(National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England, 2013)
http://www.teamsteppsportal.org/teamstepps- materials
Quality Improvement In situ Simulation Latent Errors Identified Quality Governance Mechanism
Discuss human factors education in your organisation: – Which organisations are providing education? – Who is attending? Thinking about human factors education more broadly, what are the: – Gaps? – Duplications? – Challenges? – Opportunities?
Table Topic of conversation Proposer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Extra
and return your badges before leaving