RO ROBO BOT IN IN TK TKA: A: KEEP IT EEP IT CONVENTIONAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ro robo bot in in tk tka a keep it eep it conventional
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

RO ROBO BOT IN IN TK TKA: A: KEEP IT EEP IT CONVENTIONAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RO ROBO BOT IN IN TK TKA: A: KEEP IT EEP IT CONVENTIONAL NVENTIONAL. IT . IT HAS HAS WOR WORKE KED FOR D FOR YEARS Doug ouglas las A. D Denn nnis is, M , M.D. Adjun junct ct Prof ofes essor or, Dept. t. of Bio iomed


slide-1
SLIDE 1

RO ROBO BOT IN IN TK TKA: A: KEEP IT EEP IT CONVENTIONAL

  • NVENTIONAL. IT

. IT HAS HAS WOR WORKE KED FOR D FOR YEARS

Doug

  • uglas

las A. D Denn nnis is, M , M.D.

Adjun junct ct Prof

  • fes

essor

  • r, Dept.
  • t. of Bio

iomed edical al Engine neer ering ng Univ iversity ty of Tenne nnessee Assista tant nt Clin linical al Prof

  • fes

essor

  • r, Dept.
  • t. of Orthop

thopedic c Surgery Univ iversity ty of Color lorado

  • Heal

alth th Scien ence ces Cente nter Clini linical cal Dir irec ecto tor Roc

  • cky Mtn. Muscul

culos

  • skel

elet etal al Resear arch h Laborator

  • ry

Denver er, Color

  • rad

ado

slide-2
SLIDE 2

DISCLOSU DISCLOSURE RE

Consu

  • nsult

ltant nt : Dep epuy uy Royalties: s:

  • Depuy /

puy / Innome Innomed / / Wol Wolte ters K s Kluw uwer

Lab Labor

  • ratory Rese

esearch Sup uppo port

  • Depuy

puy

  • Por
  • rte

ter A Adve dventi ntist Hospi st Hospita tal

Ow Owners rship In Inte tere rest: Jo Joint t Vue ue

slide-3
SLIDE 3

THIS THIS I I KNOW !! KNOW !!

Use Of Com

  • mpu

pute ter N r Navigatio igation & & Robo

  • botics

cs C Can I an Impr prove e Accu curacy racy Of Compo

  • mponen

ent P Placem emen ent

Majority

jority Of The he Data S ta Shows

  • ws N

No Impr provem emen ent I t In F Func unctio tional al Outco comes es O Or Surv rviv ivor

  • rship !

hip !!

slide-4
SLIDE 4

LET LET’S EXAM EXAMINE NE WHAT WHAT IS INV IS INVOLVED D TO PER TO PERFORM M ROB ROBOTIC TKA C TKA

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CONGESTED TED O OR ENVIR VIRONM ONMENT ENT ↑ AIR IRFLOW OW D DISR SRUPTI TION ? ON ??

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CONGESTED TED O OR ENVIR VIRONM ONMENT ENT

May N

Not

  • t Be Enoug

e Enough Room

  • om For

For Y Your

  • ur

Rout

  • utin

ine A e Ass ssis istan ants ts

Ma

May R Require A A Self- Retr tracti action S n Syste tem

slide-7
SLIDE 7

TKA TIME TKA TIME: P PREOP + + INTR INTRAOP

↑ Preo

Preop Pl Plannin ing T Time

↑ Intrao

traop Time

  • Room
  • om S

Set-up up

  • Drapi

ping R g Robo bot

  • Moving R

ng Robo

  • bot I

Int nto Posi

  • sition
  • Hand

ndpi piece A Assembl bly To R To Robot

slide-8
SLIDE 8

TKA TIME TKA TIME: P PREOP + + INTR INTRAOP

Inse

serting g & R Remov

  • ving

g Reg egis istratio ion Pi Pins (4) (4)

  • Late P

te Pin H Hole e Fractu cture R re Risk??

Bone R

e Registrati tration ( (40 Points ts)

Sa

Sawb wblad lade R Reg egis istratio ion : : Twice wice

  • Femo

moral Blade de

  • Ti

Tibi bial Blade

slide-9
SLIDE 9

TKA TIME TKA TIME: P PREOP + + INTR INTRAOP

Movi

Moving R Robotic A Arm In & In & Out O t Of Opera erativ ive e Field ield

  • Must

Must B Be D Don

  • ne

Care arefu fully lly

  • Inju

jury ry To Su Surgic ical Sta l Staff ff

  • Steril

Sterilit ity

Intrao

traop Adj djust stments

  • In &

In & Out Out

  • ↑ OR

OR Ti Time

slide-10
SLIDE 10

PRECI PRECISION / / ACCURACY ACCURACY

Still

ill Re Requires ires Surg rgeo eon Re Regis istratio ration

Le

Learned Fr d From

  • m CAS:

: Sur urge geon E

  • n Error
  • rs Oc

s Occur ur

“GARBAGE IN

E IN = = GAR ARBAGE O E OUT” UT”

slide-11
SLIDE 11

DOES DOES IT IT MAKE MAKE A A DIFFER FFERENCE I ENCE IN C CLINI INICAL L OUT UTCOMES ? OMES ??

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CAS CAS VS VS NO NO CAS CAS

Most Show

  • st Show I

Improved ed A Alig lignmen ent B t But ut No Clini nical cal D Differ erenc ences es

No C Clin inical ical D Differ feren ence ce

  • Denni

nnis, JOA A 2013 013

  • Venk

nkate atesan, J Knee ee Surg 201 2013

  • Hoppe

pe, Act Acta Ortho thop 201 2012

  • Kim, JBJ

BJS Am Am 20 2012

  • Burne

nett tt, CORR RR 2013 013

  • Har

arvie, JOA OA 201 2012

CAS AS S Super erior

  • Schnu

hnurr, In Int Ortho thop 201 2012

  • Hoffart, JBJS Br 2012

012

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CAS CAS VS VS NO NO CAS CAS

54

54 Bil Bilateral T l TKA KA

2 Fellow

  • wshi

ship T p Traine ned d Arthr hrop

  • plasty S

Surgeons

  • ns

CAS /

/ No C No CAS

Mean

an F F/U: 2. 2.5 5 Year ears

No C

Clin inica ical l Differen rences ces

  • KSS

SS / ROM OM

Fewer A

Alignm nment nt Out Outliers In C s In CAS Gr Group

Dennis, Kindsfater, et al, JOA 2013

slide-14
SLIDE 14

TKA A ALIGN GNMEN MENT

398 T

98 TKA R A Rev evie iewed @ @ 15 Y Year ears

Com

  • mpar

ared ed A Alig lignmen ent V t Vs Sur s Surviv ival

“A Postoperative Mechanical Axis of

0° ± 3° Did Not Improve The Fifteen- Year Implant Survival Rate”

IS THE ROBOT WORTH IT ??

Parratte tte, , Pagnano ano, e et al, JB JBJS 2 2010

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TKA A ALIGN GNMEN MENT

Ga

Gait La t Lab A b Ana nalysi ysis s Of Of 35 TK TKA

  • 17 Ne

Neutr utral A Alignme gnment nt

  • 9 Va

Varus us & & 4 Va Valgus gus Alignme gnment nt

No

No Cor

  • rrelati

tion

  • n Betw

tween n TK TKA A Alignme gnment & nt & Dyna ynami mic K Kne nee Loa Loadi ding D ng Dur uring ng Ga Gait

IS

IS THE THE PRECIS ISION ON A ROB OBOT MA OT MAY OFFE Y OFFER OF OF ANY NY VA VALUE LUE IN IN CLINIC LINICAL L OUTC OUTCOME OME ? ??

Riv iviere, , Parratte tte, e et t al, l, K Knee 2 nee 201 017

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ME MEANINGFU FUL CLI L CLINICA CAL L DA DATA

THER

THERE ISN ISN’T ANY !! ANY !!

  • Minim

imal al S Short

  • rt Term R

rm Repo port rts

  • Small N

l Num umbers bers Of Patien ents

  • Docu

cumen ent t It C Can B an Be D Done

  • ne Safely
  • Most D

t Data ta Pertain tains T To U

  • UKA
  • Similar R

lar Results ults With T ith TKA ? ??

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ROBOT ROBOT COS COST $$$$ $$$$$

Health

lthcar care C e Cris isis is

> $1,000,

000,000 000

Doe

Does It It Fit With Fit With Bundl Bundling ng

How

How Many Many Hos Hospitals Can Can Afford Afford It It ??

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ROBOT ROBOT COS COST $$$$ $$$$$

Requ

Requires A A Preo reop CT CT Sca can

  • Incr

Increased Cos Cost

  • Patien

tient R t Radiation iation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

QUESTIONS I ESTIONS I HAVE

WHAT

AT I IS S THE LEARN E LEARNING C CURV RVE ? ??

Ho

How Ma w Many Ca Cases A Are R Required Befor

  • re T

e The R Roboti tic P c Proc

  • cedur

ure e Beco ecomes es T Time N e Neut utral ? l ??

  • Total OR
  • tal OR R

Room

  • om Occup

Occupatio ion T n Time

  • Sk

Skin in → Ski kin Tim Time

How

  • w A

About

  • ut For

For The Sur he Surgeo eon W n Who ho Ha Has Ne Never Us Used A A Robot B Before ?? ??

slide-20
SLIDE 20

QUESTIONS I ESTIONS I HAVE

Richar

hard D d D. Scot

  • tt.
  • t. M

MD

“Total

  • tal K

Knee A ee Arth throplas plasty ty I Is A Sof Soft Tiss Tissue O Ope peration”

IS

IS THE RO THE ROBO BOT BETT BETTER TH THAN CO CONV NVENTIONAL SO SOFT TISS FT TISSUE E BALA LANC NCING ING T TECHNIQ NIQUES ? ??

slide-21
SLIDE 21

QUESTIONS I ESTIONS I HAVE

A Marketing P

eting Progr gram I am Is Prov

  • vided T

ided To The H Hospital pital

ARE H

HOSPITA ITALS P PURCHASING SING TO IMPR PROVE P VE PATIENT C TIENT CARE & E & CL CLINICAL O OUTC UTCOMES MES OR R TO TO INC NCREA EASE SE P PATIENT TIENT VOLUM LUME ? ??

slide-22
SLIDE 22

SUM SUMMARY: ARY: ROBO ROBOTIC T TKA KA

Ne

New & & Costl

  • stly

y Te Technol nology

  • gy

Can

n Impr Improv

  • ved P

d Precisi sion

  • n Of

Of Alignme gnment nt Bene nefit Long t Long Te Term S m Sur urvi vivor vorshi ship p ??

No

No Clini nical D Data ta To To Show how It It Impr Improve

  • ves

Long Long-Te Term C Clini nical Outc Outcome

  • mes

s

Enc

ncour

  • urage S

Sur urge geon n Use Users To s To Col

  • llect

t & & Ana nalyze yze D Data ta To To Prove

  • ve Clini

nical Superio riorit rity

Not

Not Ye Yet R t Ready y For For Wi Wide despr spread Use Use ! !!

slide-23
SLIDE 23

THAN THANK K YOU YOU