risk from release of biotech trees
play

risk from release of biotech trees James S. Clark Nicholas School - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Our charge: Forest health measures for evaluating risk from release of biotech trees James S. Clark Nicholas School of the Environment Department of Statistical Science Duke University My charge: Climate-change emphasis Biotechnology


  1. Our charge: Forest health measures for evaluating risk from release of biotech trees James S. Clark Nicholas School of the Environment Department of Statistical Science Duke University

  2. My charge: Climate-change emphasis • Biotechnology risks to forest-health • How they differ from non-biotech efforts • Modelling to assess risks

  3. f forest health – why size-species str Ele lements of tructure? • ‘ Human health ’ : concern for • Forests: ’dynamic size -species structure (SSS) ’ the individual • The basis for conservation and management: thinning practice • Species diversity : is it declining? • Mammals: ‘ body condition ’— Individual species at risk we mostly don’t care about • Example services : individuals • Masting system — base of the food chain • Carbon storage • Wood/fiber • Demography: individual scale • Recreation/spiritual renewal • Sustainable : change in size-species performance impacts structure (SSS) populations • Monitored throughout N America and most European countries

  4. Siz ize-species structure (S (SSS): : climate, management, disturbance • Combined effects of demography • Concentrations in large size classes: recruitment failure, succession • Concentration in small size classes: recruitment bottleneck in crowded stands, invasion Clark et al, National Climate Assessment (2016)

  5. Main points • Risks • Exotic invaders suggest • Escape: pollination, seed the possible dispersal • The role of monitoring • Super competitors that beat • How much is enough? the pervasive limitations • Models could do better • Pathogens/insects released • but not much from natural enemies

  6. The pervasive limitations • Escape • Demography • Fecundity: few individuals • Recruitment : • Pollen expensive, dispersal • Understory water, light inefficient, short-term viability, • Important dynamics limited to hybridization open environments • Attribution: noisy data, but • Seed expensive, dispersal compound interest inefficient • Pathogen regulation • Damping off common • Ex : individual produces 10 6 seeds • Poorly understood, hard to in a population with average replacement of 1 tree attribute • Complications: both host and pathogens respond similarly

  7. A novel invader • Novel traits leading to: • Super-competitors — novel traits that beat the pervasive limitations • Release from natural enemies — vulnerable recruitment stages • Introduction and spread : • LDD of pollen ( Quercus, Pinus ) and seed (wind Populus, many by animal vectors) • Hybridize (e.g., Quercus ) • Recruit : not only open environments, but also understory invasion • Summary : abundant pollen and seed, hybridize, withstand fungal attack and understory competition

  8. Super competitor potential Ailanthus beats the limitations in competitive stands: • Early maturation, high fecundity, root suckering • Establishes in the understory • Must withstand pathogen attack • Allelopathy

  9. Monitoring can be critical: Ailanthus invading closed forest 0.06 50 DF_BW 40 Basal area (m^2/ha) 0.04 Seeds per m2 30 20 0.02 10 0.00 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year

  10. Ailanthus invading closed forest 0.06 50 DF_BW ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 40 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Basal area (m^2/ha) ● ● ● ● ● 0.04 ● ● ● ● Seeds per m2 ● ● ● ● 30 ● ● ● ● ● ● 20 0.02 10 10 0.00 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 0 Year

  11. Ailanthus invading closed forest DF_BW 2000 0.06 50 DF_BW ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 40 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Basal area (m^2/ha) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 0.04 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Seeds per m2 ● ● ● ● ● ● 30 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 20 50 m 0.02 ● ● ● ● 10 10 0.00 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 0 Year

  12. Ailanthus invading closed forest DF_BW 2001 0.06 50 DF_BW ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 40 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Basal area (m^2/ha) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 0.04 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Seeds per m2 ● ● ● ● ● ● 30 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 20 50 m 0.02 ● ● ● ● ● ● 10 10 0.00 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 0 Year

  13. Ailanthus invading closed forest DF_BW 2001 0.06 50 DF_BW ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 40 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Basal area (m^2/ha) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 0.04 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Seeds per m2 ● ● ● ● ● ● 30 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 20 50 m 0.02 ● ● ● ● ● ● 10 10 0.00 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 0 Year

  14. Ailanthus invading closed forest DF_BW 2002 0.06 50 DF_BW ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 40 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Basal area (m^2/ha) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 0.04 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Seeds per m2 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 30 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 20 50 m 0.02 ● ● ● ● ● ● 10 10 0.00 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 0 Year

  15. Ailanthus invading closed forest DF_BW 2003 0.06 50 DF_BW ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 40 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Basal area (m^2/ha) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 0.04 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Seeds per m2 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 30 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 20 50 m 0.02 ● ● ● ● ● ● 10 10 0.00 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 0 Year

  16. Ailanthus invading closed forest DF_BW 2004 0.06 50 DF_BW ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 40 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Basal area (m^2/ha) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 0.04 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Seeds per m2 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 30 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 20 50 m 0.02 ● ● ● ● ● ● 10 10 0.00 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 0 Year

  17. Ailanthus invading closed forest DF_BW 2005 0.06 50 DF_BW ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 40 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Basal area (m^2/ha) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 0.04 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Seeds per m2 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 30 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 20 50 m 0.02 ● ● ● ● ● ● 10 10 0.00 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 0 Year

  18. Ailanthus invading closed forest DF_BW 2006 0.06 50 DF_BW ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 40 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Basal area (m^2/ha) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 0.04 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Seeds per m2 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 30 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 20 50 m 0.02 ● ● ● ● ● ● 10 10 0.00 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 0 Year

  19. Ailanthus invading closed forest DF_BW 2007 0.06 50 DF_BW ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 40 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Basal area (m^2/ha) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 0.04 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Seeds per m2 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 30 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 20 50 m 0.02 ● ● ● ● ● ● 10 10 0.00 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 0 Year

  20. Ailanthus invading closed forest DF_BW 2008 0.06 50 DF_BW ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 40 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Basal area (m^2/ha) ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 0.04 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Seeds per m2 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 30 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 20 50 m 0.02 ● ● ● ● ● ● 10 10 0.00 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 0 Year

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend