Risk assessment Nemko, 2018-02-06 Geir Hrthe Jon Ivar Tidemann 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

risk assessment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Risk assessment Nemko, 2018-02-06 Geir Hrthe Jon Ivar Tidemann 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Risk assessment Nemko, 2018-02-06 Geir Hrthe Jon Ivar Tidemann 2 13.06.2017 Risk? Probability x Speed? Severity Dark? = Car? Wet? Risk Size? Distance? Speed? Fire Truck? 3 Risk? Probability Severity 4 Risk? Risk analysis


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Risk assessment

Nemko, 2018-02-06

Geir Hørthe Jon Ivar Tidemann

slide-2
SLIDE 2

13.06.2017 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Risk?

Speed? Distance? Wet? Dark?

Probability

Car? Fire Truck? Speed? Size?

Severity x = Risk

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Risk?

Probability Severity

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Risk?

Risk analysis = what are the risks? Risk evaluation = is risk acceptable? Risk assessment

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Risk level – what is ok?

Probability Severity

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Risk standard

  • Inherent Hazard
  • User
  • Location
  • Use / Misuse
  • Faults
  • Statistics
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Risk report

Product’s hazards:

  • Sharp
  • Kinetic energy
  • Fire
  • etc

User:

  • Age, disability , trained ..
  • Intended / non intended user
  • Use / Misue
  • etc

Describe scenario:

  • Child breaks lamp

and gets a burn

  • etc.

Level of Severity:

  • cut
  • burn
  • etc

Probability:

  • e.g. < 1/100 000

Find Risk level:

  • use risk table.

Acceptable risk?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Risk reduction

  • 1. Reduce inherent hazard
  • 2. Safeguarding
  • 3. Information
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Risk reduction – a practical example

  • 1. Reduce inherent hazard
  • 2. Safeguarding
  • 3. Information
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Risk assessment, Part II

Nemko, 2018-02-06

Jon Ivar Tidemann

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

  • LVD Directive 2014/35/EU, Annex III, 2.

The technical documentation shall include an adequate analysis and assessment of the risk(s). The Blue Guide This analysis has to be documented and included in the technical documentation, unless risk assessment is included in the harmonized standard.

Yes it is- mandatory to do risk analysis from April 20th, 2016

slide-13
SLIDE 13

TITLE 13

1. – identify the scope and target users of the product 2. – identify the intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse 3. – identify the hazards during each life cycle, such as during: design, manufacture, installation, maintenance, repair and disposal 4. – estimate the risks caused by each identified hazard 5. – if the results of the risk assessment show that the remaining risk is at a tolerable level, no further action is needed 6. – if not, risk reduction has to be implemented 7. – the loop is repeated until the remaining risk is reduced to a tolerable level.

The Risk Process step by step

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Adviced start: Brainstorming

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TITLE 15

Where to find Cenelec Guide 32

https://www.cenelec.eu/membersandexperts/referencematerial/cenelecguides.html

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Annex A of the guide

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Annex D of the guide

slide-18
SLIDE 18

07.02.2018 19

Example 1- defining hazards with a product and calculate the risk

slide-19
SLIDE 19

07.02.2018 TITLE 20

  • Assumptions:
  • It is a child of age 1-3 in 5% of homes having an iron
  • User of the iron is away for some seconds in 1% of

situations.

  • Child try to raise and catch the iron in 10% of situations
  • Iron need to tilt and fall down-50% probability

What is the risk for this to happen?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

07.02.2018 TITLE 21

  • What happens then?
  • Hit in the head
  • Falls down and brakes so child can get electrical shock
  • Falls down on the body of the child
  • Does not brake and child take it up and get burned.

Scenarios

If child grips cord-then it falls down

slide-21
SLIDE 21

07.02.2018 TITLE 22

Overall probability and severity

Probability: 1/20 x1/100x 1/10 x 1/2 = 1/ 40 000 (5% X 1% X 10% X 50% ) Ref: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32010D0015

slide-22
SLIDE 22

07.02.2018 TITLE 23

Result –Low risk

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Example of risk reduction

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Tolerable level and the 3 step method

Step Reducing hazard

1 2 3

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Tolerable level and the 3 step method

Step Reducing hazard

1

  • LED instead of Incandescent,
  • Plastic enclosure instead of Glass,
  • Avoid child appealing design

2 3

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Tolerable level and the 3 step method

Step Reducing hazard

1

  • LED instead of Incandescent,
  • Plastic enclosure instead of Glass,
  • Avoid child appealing design

2

  • Batteries or below 42 volts ,
  • Fixed instead of movable

3

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Tolerable level and the 3 step method

Step Reducing hazard

1

  • LED instead of Incandescent,
  • Plastic enclosure instead of Glass,
  • Avoid child appealing design

2

  • Batteries or below 42 volts ,
  • Fixed instead of movable

3 Not recommended

slide-28
SLIDE 28

13.06.2017 NEMKO EUROPE 29

  • Cenelec Guide 32, Annex D:

Final documentation to put into technical file

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Injury scenario (include user) Injury type and body part Severity (1-4) Probability of injury Overall possibility Risk (L/M/H/S)

Listing of hazards and calculations

Are all the risks tolerable for your company? Use the 3 step method for reduction of risk

slide-30
SLIDE 30

COMPANY PRESENTATION 15.05.2013 31

nemko.com

Any questions?

For assistance contact: geir.horthe@Nemko.com jonivar.tidemann@Nemko.com