risk assessment
play

Risk Assessment Reduce the workers and Biosafety is an inexact - PDF document

Risk Analysis Biosafety Risk assessment, Risk Risk analysis encom passes Management & risk risk assessm ent, risk communication m anagem ent, and risk com m unication. Ephy Khaemba International Livestock Research Institute


  1. Risk Analysis Biosafety Risk assessment, Risk � Risk analysis encom passes Management & risk risk assessm ent, risk communication m anagem ent, and risk com m unication. Ephy Khaemba International Livestock Research Institute Utilizing the Risk Assessment What is Risk Assessment? as a Deciding Factor “ The biosafety level assigned for � � Risk: the probability that harm, injury, or the specific work to be done is disease will occur; the probability of an therefore driven by professional adverse (health) effect judgment based on a risk assessment” - WHO Laboratory � Assessment : The process of gathering Biosafety Manual and judging evidence in order to decide whether a person has achieved a standard or objective Risk Assessment Risk Assessment � Reduce the worker’s and � “Biosafety is an inexact science, and environment’s risk of exposure the interacting system of agents and activities and the people performing them are constantly changing.” � The Risk is never zero • Every etiologic agent is different • Every laboratory is different • Every person is different � Biological Safety:Principles and Practices, 4th Ed. Fleming DO, Hunt DL, eds., p. 81. Washington, DC. American Society for Microbiology, 2006 1

  2. RI SK MANAGEMENT Laboratory Hazards PROCESS Biological organisms Make Risk Decision & Develop � Controls Access Hazards Animals � Chemicals � Radiation � I dentify Hazards I mplement Controls Physical � Supervise and Evaluate Risk Management steps Risk Assessment steps Ways to mitigate RISK What hazard? � Anticipate the issues Biohazard: a biological agent or condition that constitutes a hazard to man or his � Remove or reduce the hazard environment; also a hazard posed by such an agent or condition. � I ncrease familiarity with the hazard � Train to deal with hazard From Webster’s 9th New Collegiate Dictionary, Miriam- Webster Inc. Publishers, Springfield, MA � I ncrease protection from the hazard USA, 1985 � Have a back up plan (in case all of the previous fail) The CDC/ NI H BMBL and the WHO Laboratory Biosafety Manual Qualitative Risk Assessment Outcome-oriented, not prescriptive, but ultimately based on risk Identify all applicable risk factors assessment - Biological agent Laboratory director responsible for assessing risks and setting - Work procedures and practices the biosafety level - Personnel A participatory strategy works best - Facility involve workers, safety professionals • Review guidelines, regulations, publications develop training initiatives • Assess available epidemiological and field data vigilant review for effectiveness Consult subject matter experts • Recognize any available animal data 2

  3. Over-arching Principles Biohazard Risk Assessment • Standard precautions are always advisable A biohazard risk assessment is a process which evaluates the risk posed by the • Be conservative when insufficient information forces subjective judgment agent, the procedure (s), and the worker to: • Everyone is responsible for the risk assessment • work and management process – not just the • staff “management” • environment • community Step 1 Risk Assessment FIVE STEP approach to Risk Assessment: Identify agent hazards 1. Identify laboratory procedure hazards 2. Determine preliminary Biosafety Level 3. � 4. Evaluate staff for proficiency in laboratory and occupational health needs and use of safety equipment. Identify Agent � 5. Review the risk assessment with a Biosafety professional, subject matter expert and the Institutional Biosafety Committee. Risk Assessment: Agent Basis Biological Hazard Recognition ► What is known about the agent (Category, Biological organism Amount of agent, Transmissibility)? Pathogenicity ► What information is in the literature? Mode of transmission Work practices ► Is an LD 50 , ID 50 or TCID 50 given? Animal work ► Is the agent/material known to cause Training infectious or toxigenic disease? Personnel Workplace surveys Publications/research 3

  4. Agent Based Risk Assessment Agent Based Risk Assessment ► Ordinary work procedures and type of � Potential outcome of exposure work to be done (clinical samples, research, large scale, concentration) � Natural route of infection/other routes of ► Is the host range limited or broad? infection (parenteral, airborne, ingestion) ► Is post-exposure treatment, vaccine or � Stability in the environment prophylaxis available? Agent Based Risk Assessment Agent Based Risk Assessment � Information available (animal studies, � Ordinary work procedures and type of work to be done (clinical samples, laboratory-acquired infections, clinical research, large scale, concentration) reports � Worker (host) factors (training, health) � Laboratory activity (sonication, aerosolization, centrifugation, etc.) � Other agent related questions? � Genetic manipulation Risk Assessment: Lab Activity Step 2 Basis � Conduct a protocol based biohazard risk assessment � I nclude laboratory activities that may not be listed in protocols � Evaluate Lab Activities to Identify Potential Hazard 4

  5. Risk Assessment for the Potential routes of transmission Clinical Lab for LAIs: What: Investigate potential routes of transmission Assessment of risk • Spills/ Splashes for Laboratory Acquired Infections focuses Aerosol • primarily on How? Identify activities which could release the exposures the prevention of organism and expose the worker, co-workers Cuts/ Lacerations • and/or the environment laboratory- Needle sticks acquired • Animal bites infections (LAI ) • Factors Necessary for CHAI N OF I NFECTI ON Transmission proper training, use proper PPE Pathogen/ I mproper practices, training or equipment allows organism to escape from vial Infectious organism � Presence of agent x T RAI NI NG A P P R O P R I A T E R I S K A S S E S S M E N T & P R O P E R resistance in environment, improper disinfection Exposure/ � Stability of agent effective disinfection, proper ventilation, PPE, reduce Incident aerosols x � Sufficient virulence of agent Route of transmission route of entry provided: scratch, blood, ingestion, mucous membrane, or respiratory exposure � Mechanism of transmission to host x Infectious dose vaccination � Correct portal of entry x Host available treatment � Susceptible host Susceptibility Compromised immune status x surveillance INFECTION Agent Considerations Aerosol Issues AEROSOL I NFECTI OUS DOSE* • Procedures that impart energy into a Agent Estimated I nfectious Dose � � microbial suspension are a potential source of Ebola virus 1 – – aerosol (Chatigny, 1974) M. tb 1 – 10 – – Tularemia 10 – – Brucella 10 – 100 – – • Laboratory procedures having potential of Anthrax 2,500-55,000 viable spores – – releasing aerosols are ubiquitous Cholera 10^ 8 – – � opening vials, centrifugation, mixing, sonication, Salmonella typhi 10^ 3 – – blending, grinding, shaking, vortexing, spills, pipetting, E. coli 10^ 8 – – etc. E. coli O157:H7 10 – 100 – – Shigella spp. 10 – 100 – – 5

  6. Viable Particles Recovered from Microbiological procedures Air presenting risk of aerosol in lab Procedure # Particles/ft3 of air • streaking plates 6 • spreading material on slides sonic oscillator � � cooling loop in media mixing w/ pipette 7 • � � “sniffing plates” • � overflow from mixer � 9 Catalase tests • � opening lyophilized vial 135 � Pipetting • top removed after blending � 1500 � Inoculating blood tubes • dropping flask of culture � 1551 � • heating loop in bunsen burner flame dropping lyophilized culture � 4839 � Rapid test kits/automated liquid dispensing • (from Chatigny 1974 Pipetting Sharps Hazards Syringes and needles, scalpels and broken glass Auto-inoculation � mishandling � separation from syringe � no mouth pipetting � Inoculating blood tubes and bottles � disposable plastic pipettes � � inappropriate disposal don’t expel last drop � � poor work practices all samples handled in biosafety cabinet � � collect pipettes inside biosafety cabinet Laboratory Considerations Sharps Precautions � Facility Specific locations for sharps in lab � Never fill sharps containers all the way � � Laboratory work practices Use self-retracting needles and other � engineering controls � PPE no recapping, bending, breaking, etc. � � Resources Substitute plastic for glass when possible � Avoid glass Pasteur pipettes and capillary � Procedures � tubes � culture Practice “infectious spill with glass” clean-up � procedures � large volumes immediate collection/disposal � � animals � diagnostics 6

  7. Risk Assessment No Problem Here… Right? Considerations • Pathogen (Agent) • Procedures (Protocol) • Protective Equipment • Place (lab facility) • Personnel (host) � the 5 P’s of Risk Assessment) Step 3 Establishing a “Starting Point” Determining the 1. preliminary biosafety level 2. additional precautions � Preliminary Determination of Biosafety Requires a comprehensive understanding of Level the practices, safety equipment, and laboratory facility safeguards involved in the work to be undertaken Step 4 Worker Assessment � Worker assessment must focus on identifying gaps: 1) Worker experience 2) Occupational health and safety (includes prophylaxis and fit � Worker Assessment testing ) 7

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend